1. When using a new piece of evidence in analyzing a historical event, a historian should

Answer: one of the difficult times for humanity in general and the medical industry in particular.

The medical industry is always the industry that suffers the most when there is an outbreak of a disease. Because no matter what they do, someone will still blame them.

Maybe in the future, someone will jokingly say that if they were there, the situation would have been better.

Explanation:

The second great awakening was a period of religious revival that encourages individuals to pursue the knowledge of God and self. The second great awakening contradicted the assertion of the first great awakening during which the doctrine of predestination was introduced and taught

The second great awakening was a time of religious resurgence that exhorts people to seek knowledge of both God and themselves.

It was the Second Great Awakening, a time of intense religious passion. The Second Great Awakening placed a strong emphasis on the necessity of converting people to Protestant Christianity, much like the First Great Awakening did in the 1730s and 1740s.

The First Great Awakening concentrated on those who were already attending churches, in contrast to the Second Great Awakening, which got underway about 1800 and reached out to the unchurched. Their self-awareness, piety, and rituals were all altered.

The Congregational churches of New England served as the focal point of the second, more conservative phase of the awakening (1810–25), which was led by theologians Timothy Dwight, Lyman Beecher, Nathaniel W. Taylor, and Asahel Nettleton.

Learn more about the Second Great Awakening, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1100097

#SPJ2

The people should support the provisional government's efforts to reform russian politics

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Please rate high if I’m correct

Answer:

Attached you will see the Map of Macedon Empire

Explanation::

The empire of Alexander the Great was so vast that  reached borders with India. That was a complete milestone  comparing the land extension of other Greek emprires such as the Athenian's. It also covered iconic territories such as Egypt and city of Jerusalen. Certainly he did not conquered everything but his military campaings did pay off for him. It is true there has been bigger empires anf  Macedon's, but we can say that the title of Alexander as The Great is well deserved.

Explanation:

Answer:

Alexander the Great was able to conquer many different places. He defeated the Persians after a bitter struggle. He also conquered Egypt and developed a city that he named after himself. ... Alexander the Great's actions definitely allow one to conclude that the title, "The Great" was an appropriate title.

Explanation:

The empire of Alexander the Great was so vast that reached borders with India. That was a complete milestone comparing the land extension of other Greek emprires such as the Athenian's. It also covered iconic territories such as Egypt and city of Jerusalen.

Explanation: His army defeated Texan forces at the Alamo and Goliad before moving eastward to the San Jacinto River. He was overpowered and taken by Gen

try searching for magazines/newspapers/advertisements from the 1950s

Answer:

I know for sure its not "I'd vote for this new constitution, if it had a bill of rights." because remember the anti-federalists fought for the bill of rights. the federalists said the constitution should be ratified imidietely to prevent chaos.(lol excuse my spelling). same goes with " I don't want to give up any more liberties; a strong national government is dangerous!". im pretty sure its not "I know something must change, but I am afraid of this new system" because that seems to go with the others. i think its " The country is falling apart; we must find a way to hold it together."

Explanation:

Answer:

4. create more jobs

Explanation:

Federal spending on public works makes construction jobs which will successfully reduce the unemployment rate

Answer:

The Mexican–American War, also known in the United States as the Mexican War and in Mexico as the Intervención Estadounidense en México, was an armed conflict between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848. It followed the 1845 U.S. annexation of Texas, which Mexico still considered Mexican territory since the government did not recognize the Velasco treaty signed by Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna when he was a prisoner of the Texian Army during the 1836 Texas Revolution. The Republic of Texas was de facto an independent country, but most of its citizens wished to be annexed by the United States. Domestic sectional politics in the U.S. were preventing annexation since Texas would have been a slave state, upsetting the balance of power between northern free states and southern slave states. In the 1844 United States presidential election, Democrat James K. Polk was elected on a platform of expanding U.S. territory in Oregon and Texas. Polk advocated expansion by either peaceful means or by armed force, with the 1845 annexation of Texas furthering that goal by peaceful means. For Mexico, this was a provocation, but Polk went further, sending U.S. Army troops to the area; he also sent a diplomatic mission to Mexico to try to negotiate the sale of territory. U.S. troops' presence was provocative and designed to lure Mexico into starting the conflict, putting the onus on Mexico and allowing Polk to argue to Congress that a declaration of war should be issued. Mexican forces attacked U.S. forces, and the United States Congress declared war.

Explanation:

Here you go, btw you should give more than 8 points ;/

Mexican War (1846–48).After weeks of fruitless diplomacy, the United States and the republic of Mexico declared war on each other in the spring of 1846. By the 1840s, many Americans held the view that the United States should reach from the Atlantic all the way to the Pacific Ocean. In 1844, Democrat James K. Polk of Tennessee ran for the presidency and won on a platform of expansionism, embracing the popular concept of “manifest destiny”—that God approved U.S. expansion throughout the continent. Polk opened diplomacy designed to redeem his campaign pledges to purchase California and other Mexican lands as well as to obtain the Oregon country from Britain. Considered in grand strategic terms, Polk intended to make the United States the undisputed national power on the North American continent and to obtain West Coast ports. The British agreed to an equitable treaty dividing Oregon, but no self‐respecting patriotic Mexican leader would be satisfied with any amount of money for California.

U.S. annexation of Texas sparked the war. The Texas Revolution of 1836 had won independence for the republic of Texas, but Mexico never officially recognized the loss of the province. Polk's predecessor, John Tyler, arranged the annexation of Texas into the United States in 1845 by a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress before Polk was sworn in. According to Mexico, the United States had torn away one of its provinces. The Mexican government rejected Polk's final offer of $35 million for California and other lands and dispatched military forces to the Rio Grande. It also rejected Texas and U.S. claims that the border extended south to the Rio Grande instead of the Nueces River.

On 23 April 1846, President Mariano Paredes announced that a state of “defensive” war existed between Mexico and the United States, in response to the violation of the Texas border by U.S. soldiers under Gen. Zachary Taylor, who marched under Polk's orders from Louisiana through Texas up to the Nueces River. On 25 April, Mexican and U.S. forces fought a skirmish between the Nueces and the Rio Grande. Eleven U.S. dragons were killed, five wounded and forty‐seven captured. It took several days for word of the skirmish to reach President Polk, who had previously decided on war even before Paredes's announcement. On 11 May, he asked Congress to acknowledge the state of war that Mexico had already announced, but did so with a resounding and controversial call: “American blood has been shed on American soil.” On 13 May, Congress strongly endorsed Polk's request, 174–14 in the House of Representatives and 40–2 in the Senate. Critics, mostly northern Whigs, condemned the president's action, asserting that he sought war to acquire more slave territory and denying that the disputed border area belonged to the United States.

Northern Mexico included two commercial centers, Santa Fe, New Mexico, and San Francisco, California. Lightly populated and distant from Mexico City, both provinces were difficult to defend. Polk met with his cabinet and formulated a remarkably ambitious strategy. He ordered U.S. soldiers to invade New Mexico, capture Santa Fe, then proceed to conquer California, where a naval squadron would assist them in securing the province. Meanwhile, General Taylor with less than 3,000 regulars would drive Mexican forces south of the Rio Grande, which the United States claimed as the international boundary. Polk assumed that if U.S. forces occupied the Rio Grande as well as key spots in New Mexico and California, Mexico would have no choice but to concede the fait accompli, and the United States would have won the war.

For their part, however, the Mexicans stood ready to fight, both for the defense of their territory and the future of their fledgling nation, which only twenty‐four years earlier had won its independence from Spain. Mexico possessed a tiny naval coast guard and on paper had a national army of more than 30,000 soldiers, over three times the U.S. Army's size at 8,500 officers and men. Numbers masked contrasts between the two armies, however. The Mexican Army was indifferently trained and unevenly equipped. Some units had enthusiastic officers, good weapons, and adequate supplies; others were deficient in all respects. Many Mexican officers held honorific commissions but knew little about military matters. The army had been involved with intrigues in the national capital, where commanders went in and out of favor with the political winds. Thus, the Mexican Army had more weaknesses than strengths.

Answer:For the Jewish people Syrian rule differed from Persian rule because the Syrians outlawed Judaism and the Persians encouraged free worship for the Jews.

Answer:The Syrians eventually outlawed Judaism, while the Persians encouraged free worship.

Explanation:

Answer:

The struggle for civil rights by minority groups.

Explanation:

America had always been a place for people from Europe, Africa, Asia, and Hispanics. There have been movements for equal rights in society by the minority group, including blacks and Hispanics. African American often faced racial violence and discrimination. The Civil Rights Movement involved many different plans and methods, including legal action and nonviolent civil disobedience. The Latin Americans civil rights struggle did not begin in 1903.

Answer:

C. How the Americans would fight against the British.

Explanation:

The Battle of Bunker Hill in Massachusetts was one of the many battles fought between the colonial power, Britain, and its colony America. This 1775 was a result of Britain's attempts to take control of the city and take over the seaports.

Fought majorly along with Breed's Hill, this battle was fought when the Americans tried to defend their lands from being overly captured by the British. Though this battle ended in the defeat of the Americans by the British, the battle showed how the Americans would fight against the British.

Thus, the correct answer is option C.

Based on historical perspective, the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775 helped to show "how the Americans would fight against the British."

The battle of Bunker Hill in 1775 was one of the earliest battles during the American War of Revolution.

The outcome of the battle of Bunker Hill was won by the British; however, the inexperienced Americans caused the British to have a lot of casualties which totaled 1,054 soldiers out of about 3,000 soldiers.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "How the Americans would fight against the British."

Learn more about the Battle of Bunker Hill here: https://brainly.com/question/11049470

Answer:

G

Explanation:

he bought it from France I'm sure if it but the answer is G

Answer:

1.B

2.G

3.E

4.i

5.J

6.A

7.C

8.F

9.D

10.H

Answer:

George Whitefield

Explanation:

The description of "He was an Anglican minister, known for his work in the First Great Awakening and his assistance to John and Charles Wesley in founding the Methodist Church, " matches that of George Whitefield. He was a Briton by nationality and was born in 1714 in Great Britain.

He was popular for being the founders of Methodism and the evangelical movement. He eventually died at age 55 in Newburyport, Province of Massachusetts Bay, British America

Answer:

Nativism

Explanation:

Nativists feared the large influxes of immigrants to the US in the 1800s, fearing they would take their jobs or hurt the economy.

They favored native people that were born in the US, opposed to immigrants from European countries like Ireland or Germany.

Their policies favoring natives and discriminating immigrants were called nativism.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

Its D. The industrial power of the united states

Explanation:

Ape.x

The industrial power of the United States: played a part in U.S. economic growth in the 1950s. Thus, option D is the correct option.

The baby boom, the conclusion of World War II, and government policies that supported economic expansion all contributed to the 1950s and 1960s economic boom in the United States. Throughout the 1950s, the economy as a whole expanded by 37%, while the unemployment rate stayed low at 4.5%. The median American household had 30% more purchasing power by the decade's end than it had at its start.

Due in part to Eisenhower's attempts to balance the federal budget, there was little inflation. Veterans were able to finance college thanks to the GI Bill, which helped the workforce by producing a pool of highly educated workers. As technological and scientific advancements increased output, low-cost oil from American wells powered industry.

Learn more about US economic growth in the 1950s here:

https://brainly.com/question/1328468

#SPJ7

Answer:

Raise all C's to a B or higher by the end of the semester

Explanation:

Answer:

Raise C's to B's (or higher) by the end of the year.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!!

Answer:

Martin Luther

Explanation:

Martin Luther was a German professor of theology, composer, priest, monk and seminal figure in the Protestant Reformation. Luther strongly disputed the claim that freedom from God's punishment for sin could be purchased with money, called indulgences, which he argued in his Ninety-five Theses of 1517.

HOPE THIS HELPS <333333

-Silver

Answer:

The immense economic inequality we observe in the world today didn’t happen overnight, or even in the past century. It is the path-dependent outcome of a multitude of historical processes, one of the most important of which has been European colonialism. Retracing our steps 500 years, or back to the verge of this colonial project, we see little inequality and small differences between poor and rich countries (perhaps a factor of four). Now the differences are a factor of more than 40, if we compare the richest to the poorest countries in the world

Answer:

1859

Explanation: Petroleum became a major industry following the oil discovery at Oil Creek, Pennsylvania, in 1859. For much of the 19th and 20th centuries, the US was the largest oil producing country in the world.

Answer: Distribution of colonies, arms race, nationalism.

Explanation:

The end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century were characterized by creating two opposing blocs in Europe. On one side were France and Britain, while on the other side were Austro-Hungary and Germany. This situation is colonial policy; Germany and Austro-Hungary wanted an equal division of the colonies, i.e., "part of the cake" for themselves. France and England had no intention of giving up. There is a weave in armaments; countries have accumulated quantities of weapons because hostility has grown from year to year. Nationalism emerged during the nineteenth century and was at its peak before the beginning. In such circumstances, the Sarajevo assassination was only a pretext for the outbreak of war.

Answer:

D. The rise in nativism among Americans.

The issue that enraged the abolitionists the most in the Missouri Compromise was the inability to enter the union as a slave state.

This Compromise was created because Missouri wanted to enter the Union as a slave state but congress did not want to throw off the balance of slave and free in the Union. So, the Compromise provided that Missouri could enter the Union as a slave state and then Maine could enter as a free state, thus keeping the balance of slave states and free states..

Therefore, the issue that enraged the abolitionists the most in the Missouri Compromise was the inability to enter the union as a slave state.

Read more about Missouri Compromise

brainly.com/question/27314624

#SPJ1

Answer:

the first guy tried give him credit

Explanation:

Answer:

Answer is at the bottom!!

Explanation:

All state governments are modeled after the federal government and consist of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The U.S. Constitution mandates that all states uphold a “republican form” of government, although the three-branch structure is not required.Government is an agency of the State. It acts for the state. It is that agency of the State which formulates the will of the state into laws, implements the laws of the state and ensures conformity to the laws of the state. Government exercises power and authority on behalf of the state.

Hope this helps!!

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

Sparta feared Athens prosper so they attacked

In order to keep the Athenians from gaining too much power, Sparta declared war on Athens.  Hence Option D is correct .

Persian planned to attack the areas that belonged to Sparta and Athens, which led to the start of the Peloponnesian War. Both of them were outnumbered at the time by the Persian empire.

As a result, Sparta and Athens decided to work together to repel the Persian army.

Between 431 and 405 B.C., the two most powerful city-states in ancient Greece, Athens and Sparta, engaged in combat. The Peloponnesian War ushered in a period of regional decline that marked the end of what is regarded as the Golden  Age and signified a dramatic power shift in ancient Greece in favor of Sparta.

Between the two, Sparta first assumed the position of leadership. But Leonidas (the individual who oversaw Sparta) Perished as the Persian army besieged them.

After he passed away, the Greeks made the decision to send further support via their naval forces, and they were successful in turning the tide of the conflict.

Learn more about Peloponnesian War here

https://brainly.com/question/18552416

# SPJ 6