a study of revolutions would most likely lead to the conclusion that pre-revolutionary governments
A) armored concerned about human rights than the government that replaced them B) refused to modernize their arms forces with advanced technology
C) attempt to bring about the separation of government from religion
D) failed to meet the political and economic needs of their people

Answer:

Fearing Soviet expansion, the United States committed itself to assisting countries whose governments faced overthrow by Communist forces and gave billions of dollars to war-torn Europe to help it rebuild

Explanation:

Answer:

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) technologies use mirrors to concentrate (focus) the sun's light energy and convert it into heat to create steam to drive a turbine that generates electrical power.

CSP technology utilizes focused sunlight. CSP plants generate electric power by using mirrors to concentrate (focus) the sun's energy and convert it into high-temperature heat. That heat is then channeled through a conventional generator. The plants consist of two parts: one that collects solar energy and converts it to heat, and another that converts the heat energy to electricity. A brief video showing how concentrating solar power works (using a parabolic trough system as an example) is available from the Department of Energy Solar Energy Technologies Web site.

Within the United States, CSP plants have been operating reliably for more than 15 years. All CSP technological approaches require large areas for solar radiation collection when used to produce electricity at commercial

Answer:

Explanation: Algeria fought the algerian war against france from 1954 to 1962. It was known for being very bloody with the french using tactics like neigborhood raids and torture. It was faught between the french army and the algerian liberation force. The french decided to quit due to getting bad reps and a threat to their own way of life aswell as getting very few victories and being very costly. :)

I think the answer is A: involves immigrants from various communities

But I’m not sure tho so sorry if I’m wrong..

Answer:

the answer is A :)

Explanation:

Answer:

112+m=x

Explanation:

The sum means the answer, so I put x where you would fill in the answer for it. "112 and m" means "112+m" because it is the value of the two variables together.

Answer:

Therefore, 6328 is the sum of positive integers up to 112.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Hessians were hired to fight against the American army. Therefore, the answer is True

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Colonization, or colonization alludes to huge scope populace developments where the transients keep up solid connections with their or their predecessors' previous nation, acquiring critical advantages over different occupants of the domain by such connections

Brainliest?? pls

Answer:

US v Nixon

Bush v Gore

Brown v Board of Education

etc.

Explanation:

Answer:

Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After seizing political power in France in a 1799 coup d'état, he crowned himself emperor in 1804.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Napoleon first seized political power in a coup d'etat in 1799. The coup resulted in the replacement of the extent governing body--a five-member Directory---by a three--person Consulate.Napoleon eventually abolished the Consulate and declared himself Emperor Napoleon I of France.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The annexation question became one of the most controversial issues in American politics in the late 1830s and early 1840s. The issue was not Texas but slavery.  

Hope this helped!!!

Answer:

Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land-Goo/gle

Explanation:

Please help me with my question

Have a nice day

The state of Georgia did not have the power to evict the Cherokee from their ancestral lands, the United States Supreme Court held in Worcester v. Georgia in 1832.

However, the United States Supreme Court decided that the Cherokee Nation was sovereign in Worcester v. Georgia one year later. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States, reached the conclusion that Georgia had no authority to impose state laws within its borders.

The Cherokee Nation was "a different political society" within which Georgia law did not apply, the Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the case's appeal, which involved the Cherokee Nation. This made the Georgia statute unconstitutional.

Learn more about Worcester v. Georgia here:

https://brainly.com/question/20593764

#SPJ5

Answer:

National, provincial and local government addressing the interest of civil society:

• National Government: Every nation needs an authorised administration, which would serve the people of the nation. The role of the National Government is to ensure protection, to give proper education, to protect civil rights and to offer all the necessary commodities (including foods, clothes, materials, etc.) nationwide. National Government works on foreign policies to bring various economical or scientific services to its people.

• Provincial Government: A Provincial Government has administrative power over a province within the nation, under the structural institution of National Government. It works to serve the civil society with education, health and social development. It also takes care of agriculture and roads. Moreover Provincial Government connects National Government with Local Government constitutionally.

• Local Government: A local government is the lowest part of governance. It is a form of public administration locally. The power to local government is delegated to them by provincial legislature.

Ralated question:

• How the levels of national, provincial and local government address the interests of civil society? - brainly.in/question/15636849

• Define local government, state government and national government of India. - brainly.in/question/5839404

• Role of government. - brainly.in/question/11888995

The best explanation to how the levels of National, Provincial and Local government address the interests of civil society is:

This refers to the social communities which work independently of the government to solve social issues.

With this in mind, we can see that from the three levels of government namely the national government, provincial government and local government, there have been efforts to address the interests of civil societies through the use of dialogue.

Read more about civil society here:
https://brainly.com/question/520026

Answer:

2. The North Vietnamese attacked American ships in the Gulf of Tonkin

Explanation:

In early August 1964, two U.S. destroyers stationed in the Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnam radioed that they had been fired upon by North Vietnamese forces. In response to these reported incidents, President Lyndon B. Johnson requested permission from the U.S. Congress to increase the U.S. military presence in Indochina

Hope this helped you!!

Answer:

Number 2.

Explanation:

Just found online.

Answer:

that woud be expansionism

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

This would be the title of the article:

"Indeed we are different. They vs. Us."

It is not easy to understand the fact that if we are all called Americans, why are we so different?

The country is the United States. But we are not United, and the states are confrontational.

Without a doubt, the North is so different than the South, and this is hurting and dividing the nation.

I am arriving from the South. What an interesting trip to that region. It opened my eyes. We are one nation, clearly divided into two. We, the northerners. They, the southerners.

Sectionalism is one factor that has influenced this separation. I realized there are some reasons that have caused this sectionalism. Of course, slavery, economic differences, culture, and legislation.

The cultural differences are remarkable and you can see them reflected in society.

Here, in the North, we are more urbanized. There is a lot of industry and urbanization is the result of better infrastructure. Although low-paid jobs are offered in industries, at least there are jobs for everyone. That is not the case in the South. They depend totally on slaves. Most people live from agriculture, growing cash crops. For them to be successful, they need slaves.

Religion is not a major issue in the North. We have faith in God and try to be good citizens. In the South, religious fervor is notorious.

Education is another factor that separates us from the South. The school system is different and there are more schools here in the North.

Finally, politics and legislation. The North is not segregationist. On the contrary, we oppose slavery. We think the new states should be "free states." The southerners think the opposite, new states should be "slave states."

Is there any short-term solution to decently resolve our disputes and differences?

I don't see any coming.

Maybe, it is just a matter of time.

Answer:

Possible Reasons:

Political - Concerns governments, rights, and power.

POLITICAL REASONS: ENCOURAGEMENT FROM RULERS

British monarchs encouraged the development of colonies as new sources of wealth and power. They

granted charters to groups of businessmen, like the Virginia Company, who offered to help colonists

settle in the “New World.”

Economic - Concerns money and wealth.

ECONOMIC REASONS: HUNGER FOR GOLD AND SILVER

Based on the success of Spain, the first colonists believed that gold and silver existed in great

abundance in the Americas. These early adventurers came to the Americas in search of precious metals.

ECONOMIC REASONS: LAND HUNGER

Colonial settlements presented new business opportunities for merchants. The“Proprietors” who

owned the Carolinas encouraged people to come. Many came to own their own land. Most people in

Britain, Ireland, and the rest of Europe were peasants or tenant farmers with small, over-worked lands

and high rents. In America, land still seemed plentiful. The settlers did not recognize the rights of

Native American Indians or understand their use of the land. Many of the first settlers were given free

land by the colony. Later, they were able to purchase land.

Later many colonists came as “indentured servants.” A colonial landowner paid for their passage across

the Atlantic, and the indentured servant promised to work on the landowner’s plantation or farm,

usually for a period of seven years. Once the debt was paid off, indentured servants obtained freedom

and began saving to buy their own land.

Religious - Deals with beliefs and practices in the worship of God.

RELIGIOUS REASONS

Protestant groups, like the Pilgrims and Puritans, came to the Americas to establish their own

communities, where they could worship God in their own way. Catholics, Quakers, and Jews later

came to the colonies seeking freedom of worship.

Social - Involves how people organize themselves or live together.

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REASONS: A BETTER LIFE

Most colonists had faced difficult lives in Britain, Ireland, Scotland, or Germany. They came to the

Americas to escape poverty, warfare, political turmoil, famine and disease. They believed colonial life

offered new opportunities

Answer:

B Aztec sorry if it's wrong

Answer:

The answer is "Option A".

Explanation:

Spain's colonization aims were for the extraction of silver and gold from its Americas, for both the promotion of its Spanish economy so for a stronger Spain. In Spain, even, American Indians were to become Christians. The excerpts more directly parallel to these patterns to creation, in Spanish communities, of hierarchical ethnic established standards by grades of connection with both the Spanish people.

Answer:

The answer is b. U.S manufacturer hiring a company in India to provide customer service.

U.S. manufacturer hiring a company in India to provide customer service is the situations is an example of outsourcing. Hence, option B is correct.

The practice of employing a third party from outside a business to carry out tasks or produce commodities that were previously completed in-house by the business's own employees and personnel is known as outsourcing. Companies typically engage in outsourcing as a cost-cutting strategy.

Contracting out business operations and processes to outside vendors is known as outsourcing. The advantages of outsourcing can be significant, ranging from cost reductions and increased efficiency to a stronger competitive advantage.

When a company buys a good or service from a third party rather than managing it itself, that practice is known as outsourcing. As a small business, outsourcing enables you to accomplish more by delegating crucial jobs.

Thus, option B is correct.

For more information about outsourcing, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28915776

#SPJ6

Answer:

forsest fires and dust storms

Explanation:

Answer:

John Quincy Adams defeated Andrew Jackson in 1824 by garnering more electoral votes through the House of Representatives, even though Jackson originally received more popular and electoral votes. The presidential election of 1824 represents a watershed in American politics.

Explanation:

this might be what your looking for

Even though Andrew Jackson had initially received more popular and electoral votes, John Quincy Adams was able to overcome him in 1824 by accumulating more electoral votes in the House of Representatives.

From 1825 until 1829, John Quincy Adams, the son of John and Abigail Adams presided as the sixth President of the United States. He held positions as a senator, a member of the house of representatives, and a member of several political parties over the years.

Adams appointed Clay to be Secretary of State after taking office. In 1828, Jackson and his enraged supporters launched a campaign to depose Adams as president after alleging that a "corrupt agreement" had been struck.

Adams did not take kindly to the Jacksonian campaign of 1828, in which they accused him of corruption and public theft. He left Massachusetts after losing, intending to live out the rest of his days on his farm and writing books.

To learn more about John Quincy Adams follow the link.

https://brainly.com/question/12416301

#SPJ5

Answer: Yes, I think he does

Explanation: You can see by the tone of the speech that he thinks that democracy is under attack.

The quote "Neutrality is no longer feasible or desirable where the peace of the world is involved" clearly implies that he is saying that they cannot be neutral anymore.

Answer:

In the US that would be California.

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The civil war tested the foundation of a country that uses democracy in that the civil war confronts people from the same country on the battlefield for political and economic reasons.

It is hard to believe that people from the same nationality -brothers we could say in a metaphorical way- confront each other to the extreme of seceding from the Union and fight using weapons. A civil war is an internal battle that hurts democracy and the legitimacy of the government that the founding fathers so carefully planned for the United States since colonial American times.

A civil war separates, divides. As President Abraham Lincoln said in his famous speech "A House divided," if a country is divided from within, this not only hurts democracy and freedom but also impacts all aspects and foundations of a nation.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The Roman Empire was so large that it covered Europe, North Africa, and parts of Asia. The large empire was hard to rule. What did the emperor do to solve this problem?

The Roman Emperor decided to split the empire into two large portions: the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire. The eastern Roman Empire ended up being the Byzantine Empire a survived approximately 1000 years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire.

The ruler that divided Rome in order to bring stability to the empire was Diocletian.

He split the Roman Empire in two, naming his son-in-law, ruler of the West. His name was Maximilian and later changed his mane to Marcus Aurelius Valerio.

Answer:

Does the mining-driven scarcity of women affect gender norms? Do gender norms persist over time? We explore the Gold Rush in Western United States in the late19th-century as a natural experiment to answer these questions. We use a geographic difference-in-difference methodology, exploiting the location and discovery of the gold deposits and its influence on sex ratios, to understand short term and persistent changes in women’s labor market participation and marriage market opportunities. Gold mining, through the oversupply of marriageable men with income, increased (decreased) marriage rates among women (men). Women married older men with higher prestige occupations. In parallel, the Gold Rush created a market based service sector economy, potentially catering to men with money but poor marriage prospects. Using all subsequent censuses up until 1940, we show that the effects persist over time.

Explanation:

Answer:

In essence it only means we want one thing. We declare our right on this earth to be a man, to be a human being, to be respected as a human being, to be given the rights of a human being in this society, on this earth, in this day, which we intend to bring into existence by any means necessary.

Explanation:

crown me

Answer:

Terence Smith, a correspondent in the Washington bureau of The Times, was the paper's chief White House correspondent during the Iranian crisis. By Terence Smith hen the evening packet of documents from the White House arrived at Camp David that Indian summer weekend, it included a memorandum from Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance that required an immediate Presidential decision. Jimmy Carter could not know it at the time, but that decision would set in train an extraordinary series of events that would preoccupy the nation for the next 15 months and profoundly affect his own future.

The issue posed by the memo on Oct. 21, 1979, had been nagging the Administration for months: Should Mohammed Riza Pahlevi, the exiled Shah of Iran, be allowed to enter the United States? Despite the risks such a move would entail, especially for the skeleton crew of Americans manning the embassy in revolutionary Teheran, most of Carter's advisers were for it. The President himself had been adamantly opposed and had lost his temper more than once on the subject. But now a new and urgent development had changed the situation and Vance was on the telephone from Washington asking for a