adjacent leg - hypotenuse = 0.139
a. 14°
opposite leg - adjacent leg = 0.249
b. 28°
opposite leg - hypotenuse = 0.469
C. 47°
adjacent leg - hypotenuse = 0.682
d 58°
opposite leg - hypotenuse 0.848
e. 82°

Answer:

impossible

Step-by-step explanation:

the formula for triangle sides is a^2 + b^2 = c^2

and these numbers dont equal that

Answer:

-6

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  D)  (0, -5)

Step-by-step explanation:

A graphing calculator is helpful. It shows that the point (0, -5) is in the solution spaces of both inequalities.

__

If we consider only the case of x=0, then the solution space reduces to ...

  -8 < y ≤ 4 . . . . . the constants of the two inequalities

Here, it is easy to see that y=-5 is in the solution space.

  (0, -5) is a solution

Answer: 4.3

Step-by-step explanation:

11x2=22

22/3= 7.3

7.3-3= 4.3

Answer:

the answer is 72 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

a²+b²=c²

a²+900=6084

a²=5184

a=72

Answer: 3 1/3

Step-by-step explanation: You change 8 1/6 to improper fraction which is 49/6 and change 4 5/6 to improper fraction which is 29/6. Next you take 49/6 and subtract 29/6 which is 20/6.After that you simplify 20/6 by divide both sides by 2 which gives you 10/3.Lastly change 10/3 to a mixed number which is 3 1/3.

Hope it helps :) and look at pic below.

Answer:

D. 3 points purchased

Step-by-step explanation:

Took the bullet

Option D is correct, based on the information Gordon purchased 3 point

A fraction represents a part of a whole.

Given that Gordon decided on purchasing a $141,000 home.

At closing he brought a check for $7570.

One point is equal to 3% of the total loan amount, so the cost of one point would be:

Cost of one point = 3% of $130,090

Cost of one point = $3,902.70

To find out how many points Gordon purchased

we need to divide the total cost of points by the cost of one point:

Number of points = Total cost of points / Cost of one point

Number of points = $10,910 / $3,902.70

Number of points = 2.8

=3

Therefore, based on the information Gordon purchased 3 points, Option D is correct.

To learn more on Fractions click:

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ2

Answer:

According to me it should be -6 [tex]\leq[/tex] y [tex]\leq[/tex] 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

it is C

Step-by-step explanation:

i did the test

Answer:

The answer is actually B.

Step-by-step explanation:

I have an actual explanation to this! But I don't like dealing with pdfs, also typing it out will be a lot. Ik I am late, but to whomever else needs help that's the answer! Glad to help:)

Answer:

2.5cm

Step-by-step explanation:

area of trapezium = 4 * area of parallelogram

1/2(a+b)*h=4* bh

1/2(5+11)*4= 4* 3.2x

8*4=4*3.2x

8/3.2=x

2.5cm=x

The frequency data table is missing, so i have attached it.

Answer:

0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to find conditional relative frequency and conditional relative frequency is used to compare the frequency count to the marginal total that represents the particular condition we are dealing with.

In this case, the condition is the popular vote of the state being won by the Democrat in 2012, given that the same popular vote was won by the Democrat in 1976.

In the frequency data table attached, we see that the joint frequency count for Democrat winning in 1976 and 2012 is given as 12.

While the corresponding marginal frequency total is given as 24.

Thus;

Conditional relative frequency = joint frequency count/marginal frequency total = 12/24 = 0.5

The conditional relative frequency of a state's popular vote being won by the Democrat in 2012, given that it was won by the Democrat in 1976:

Thus;

Conditional relative frequency = joint frequency count/marginal frequency total = 12/24 = 0.5

The conditional relative frequency of a state's popular vote being won by the Democrat in 2012, given that it was won by the Democrat in 1976 is 0.5.

Learn more :

https://brainly.com/question/19845631?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

yessssssssss.........

Answer:

Area = [tex]x^{2} +2x+2[/tex]

Perimeter = [tex]4x+1[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

So the shape is made up of one [tex]x^{2}[/tex], two xs and two 1s

add that together you get [tex]x^{2} +2x+2[/tex]

Starting at the top left you have a side length of 1. Then it goes down 1 before an x. Then you have up 1 and over 1, which is 2. Going down the right side you have a 1 and an x. Then the bottom is 1, x, and 1. You go up another x and then 1 to meet back where you started.

In total that is [tex]4x+1[/tex]

Answer:

second one

Step-by-step explanation:

Because when you try to remove the brackets then you should multiply coefficient of x and coefficient of y by 2

So it will be 2x+18y

2*9=18

Answer:

[tex](a)\ g(x) = \frac{2}{3}(x+1)[/tex]

[tex](b)\ h(y) = \frac{1}{3}[1 + 4y][/tex]

[tex](c)[/tex] [tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{5}{12}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]f(x,y) = \left \{ {{\frac{2}{3}(x+2y)\ \ 0\le x \le 1,\ 0\le y\le 1} \right.[/tex]

Solving (a): The marginal density of X

This is calculated as:

[tex]g(x) = \int\limits^{\infty}_{-\infty} {f(x,y)} \, dy[/tex]

[tex]g(x) = \int\limits^{1}_{0} {\frac{2}{3}(x + 2y)} \, dy[/tex]

[tex]g(x) = \frac{2}{3}\int\limits^{1}_{0} {(x + 2y)} \, dy[/tex]

Integrate

[tex]g(x) = \frac{2}{3}(xy+y^2)|\limits^{1}_{0}[/tex]

Substitute 1 and 0 for y

[tex]g(x) = \frac{2}{3}[(x*1+1^2) - (x*0 + 0^2)}[/tex]

[tex]g(x) = \frac{2}{3}[(x+1)}[/tex]

Solving (b): The marginal density of Y

This is calculated as:

[tex]h(y) = \int\limits^{\infty}_{-\infty} {f(x,y)} \, dx[/tex]

[tex]h(y) = \int\limits^{1}_{0} {\frac{2}{3}(x + 2y)} \, dx[/tex]

[tex]h(y) = \frac{2}{3}\int\limits^{1}_{0} {(x + 2y)} \, dx[/tex]

Integrate

[tex]h(y) = \frac{2}{3}(\frac{x^2}{2} + 2xy)|\limits^{1}_{0}[/tex]

Substitute 1 and 0 for x

[tex]h(y) = \frac{2}{3}[(\frac{1^2}{2} + 2y*1) - (\frac{0^2}{2} + 2y*0) ][/tex]

[tex]h(y) = \frac{2}{3}[(\frac{1}{2} + 2y)][/tex]

[tex]h(y) = \frac{1}{3}[1 + 4y][/tex]

Solving (c): The probability that the drive-through facility is busy less than one-half of the time.

This is represented as:

[tex]P(x>0.5)[/tex]

The solution is as follows:

[tex]P(x>0.5) = P(0\le x\le 0.5,0\le y\le 1)[/tex]

Represent as an integral

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\int\limits^1_0 \int\limits^{0.5}_0 {\frac{2}{3}(x + 2y)} \, dx dy[/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2}{3}\int\limits^1_0 \int\limits^{0.5}_0 {(x + 2y)} \, dx dy[/tex]

Integrate w.r.t. x

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2}{3}\int\limits^1_0 (\frac{x^2}{2} + 2xy) |^{0.5}_0\, dy[/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2}{3}\int\limits^1_0 [(\frac{0.5^2}{2} + 2*0.5y) -(\frac{0^2}{2} + 2*0y)], dy[/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2}{3}\int\limits^1_0 (0.125 + y), dy[/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2}{3}(0.125y + \frac{y^2}{2})|^{1}_{0}[/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2}{3}[(0.125*1 + \frac{1^2}{2}) - (0.125*0 + \frac{0^2}{2})][/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2}{3}[(0.125 + \frac{1}{2})][/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2}{3}[(0.125 + 0.5][/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2}{3} * 0.625[/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{2 * 0.625}{3}[/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{1.25}{3}[/tex]

Express as a fraction, properly

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{1.25*4}{3*4}[/tex]

[tex]P(x>0.5) =\frac{5}{12}[/tex]

Answer:

....

Step-by-step explanation:

mean: 16

median: 16

there is no mode

range: 8

The best estimate is 11/24.

To solve, find a common denominator between both 8 and 12. They can both multiply into 24.

To turn 8 into 24, you multiply by 3, so you must do the same with its numerator. To turn 12 into 24, you multiply by 2, so again, you must do the same with its numerator:

3/8 ---> 9/24

1/12 ---> 2/24

Then, you can add the numerators together and keep the denominator 24:

9/24 + 2/24 = 11/24.

Answer:

The graph shows the solution set of the equality √x < -1

(No Solutions)

Answer:

40

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:-5,-2, 0, .7,1.5,7

Step-by-step explanation:

AS shown above

Answer:

I think it's 4.5

Step-by-step explanation:

I divided the servings by the packages and I got 4.5 for each of them.

Answer:60$

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

This explanation mostly depends on what you're learning right now. The first way would be to convert this matrix to a system of equations like this.

g + t + k = 90

g + 2t - k = 55

-g - t + 3k = 30

Then you solve using normal methods of substitution or elimination. It seems to me that elimination is the quickest method.

g + t + k = 90

-g - t + 3k = 30

____________

0 + 0 + 4k = 120

4k = 120

k = 30

No you can plug this into the first two equations

g + t + (30) = 90

g + t = 60

and

g + 2t - (30) = 55

g + 2t = 85

now use elimination again by multiplying the first equation by -1

g + 2t = 85

-g - t = -60

_________

0 + t = 25

t = 25

Now plug those both back into one of the equations. I'll just do the first one.

g + (25) + (30) = 90

g = 35

Therefore, we know that Ted spent the least amount of time on the computer.

The second method is using matrix reduction and getting the matrix in the row echelon form, therefore solving using the gauss jordan method. If you would like me to go through this instead, please leave a comment.

Answer: 60

Step-by-step explanation: Plug in 8 for x and either use the linear supplements theorem to solve or the vertical angles congruence theorem.

Answer:

Write in Slope-Intercept Form

Graph

Find the x and y Intercepts

Find the Slope

Find the Slope and y-intercept

Write in y=mx+b Form

Write in Standard Form

Answer:

t=40

Step-by-step explanation:

first, add 21 to -21=0

to keep it balanced add 21 to 19=40

so t=40

hope this helps

Answer:

This is possible and the answer is (-1,0,1)

Step-by-step explanation:

It’s difficult to write out matrices here.

I apologize!