Answer:
the cash paid for goods to be sold is $226,500
Explanation:
The computation of the cash paid for goods to be sold is shown below:
= Cost of goods sold + Opening trade account payable - closing trade account payable + closing inventory - beginning inventory
= $250,000 + $17,500 - $25,000 + $31,000 - $47,000
= $226,500
Hence, the cash paid for goods to be sold is $226,500
The adjusted trial balance of Tahoe Company at the end of the accounting year, December 31, 2016, showed the following: Account Titles Adjusted Trial Balance Debits Credits Cash $20,000 Machinery 90,000 Accumulated depreciation $16,000 Accounts payable 7,000 Capital stock 20,000 Retained earnings 59,000 Service revenue 40,000 Interest expense 4,000 Operating expenses 17,000 Depreciation expense 11,000 Total $142,000 $142,000 Required: B. Calculate the 2016 ending balance in retained earnings.
Answer:
$67,000
Explanation:
Retained Earnings = Opening Balance + Profit for the Year - Dividends
where,
Profit for the Year = Sales - Expenses
= $40,000 - (4,000 + 17,000 + 11,000)
= $8,000
therefore,
Retained Earnings = $59,000 + $8,000 = $67,000
A company’s stock currently sells for $87 per share. Last week the firm issued rights to raise new equity. To purchase a new share, a stockholder must remit $20 and three rights. a. What is the ex-rights stock price? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) b. What is the price of one right? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)
Answer:
Explanation
a.
Value = 3($87)= $261
New value = $261 + 20 =$281
Ex-rights stock price= $281/(3+1) = $70.25
b.
Price of one right= $87 − 70.25 = $16.75
The ex-rights stock price is Value = 3($87)= $261
Value at new = $261 + 20 = $281
Price of Ex-rights Stock: $281/(3+1) = $70.25
What is the stock price?A share price is the price of a single share of a company's salable equity shares. In layman's terms, the stock price is the largest amount of money someone is willing to pay for the stock or the lowest amount for which it can be purchased.
a.
Value = 3($87)= $261
Value at new = $261 + 20 = $281
Price of Ex-rights Stock: $281/(3+1) = $70.25
b.
One right costs $16.75 ($87 x $70.25).
Therefore, The ex-rights stock price is Value = 3($87)= $261
Learn more about stock prices here:
https://brainly.com/question/15021152
#SPJ5
At the second week in March, job 710 has an accumulated beginning cost of $37,800. A) $9000 of direct materials were used. B) 300 hours of direct labor were charged to the job at $40 per hour C) Manufacturing Overhead was charged to the job at the rate of $40 per machine hour 160 machine hours were used. The entire Finished Goods Inventory was sold . Transfer the appropriate number to the Costs of Goods sold.
Answer:
Costs of Goods sold = $65,200
Explanation:
Since the entire Finished Goods Inventory was sold, thhis implies that there is no accumulated ending cost.
The Costs of Goods sold can be calculated as follows:
Accumulated beginning cost = $37,800
Direct materials were used = $9,000
Direct labor = Number of direct labor hours * Labor cost per hour = 300 * $40 = $12,000
Manufacturing Overhead = Number of machine hours * Cost per machine hour = 160 * $40 = $6,400
Therefore, we have:
Costs of Goods sold = Accumulated beginning cost + Direct materials were used + Direct labor + Manufacturing Overhead = $37,800 + $9,000 + $12,000 + $6,400 = $65,200
A company's inventory records indicate the following data for the month of January: Jan. 1 Beginning 180 units at $9 each Jan. 5 Purchased 170 units at $10 each Jan. 9 Sold 300 units at $35 each Jan. 14 Purchased 200 units at $11 each Jan. 20 Sold 150 units at $35 each Jan. 30 Purchased 230 units at $12 each What is the amount of cost of goods sold for January, if the company uses the LIFO, FIFO and weighted average perpetual inventory system?
Answer:
The amount of cost of goods sold for January:
LIFO FIFO Weighted Average
Cost of goods sold $4,520 $4,420 $4,452
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Date Description Units Unit Cost/Price Total Cost Total Revenue
Jan. 1 Beginning 180 units at $9 each $1,620
Jan. 5 Purchased 170 units at $10 each 1,700
Jan. 9 Sold (300) units at $35 each $10,500
Jan. 14 Purchased 200 units at $11 each 2,200
Jan. 20 Sold (150) units at $35 each 5,250
Jan. 30 Purchased 230 units at $12 each 2,760
Total 780 / 450 $8,280 $15,750
b) Cost of goods sold:
LIFO:
Jan. 9 Sold (300) 170 units at $10 = $1,700
130 units at $9 = 1,170
Jan. 20 Sold (150) 150 units at $11 = 1,650
Cost of goods sold = $4,520
c) FIFO:
Jan. 9 Sold (300) 180 units at $9 = $1,620
120 units at $10 = 1,200
Jan. 20 Sold (150) 50 units at $10 = 500
100 units at $11 = 1,100
Cost of goods sold = $4,420
d) Weighted-Average:
Jan. 9 Sold (300) 300 units at $9.49 = $2,847
Jan. 20 Sold (150) 150 units at $10.70 = 1,605
Cost of goods sold = $4,452
Weighted Average Cost at each point of sale:
$9.49 = ($1,620 + $1,700)/350 units
$10.70 = (($9.49*50) + $2,200)/250 units
e) LIFO = Last In, First Out is based on the assumption that the items sold are from the last inventory purchased instead of the first.
FIFO = First In, First Out is based on the assumption that the items sold are from the first inventory instead of the last.
Weighted-Average: This method averages the cost of inventory to determine the unit cost.
Under the perpetual inventory system, the inventory costs are recorded immediately after an inventory transaction and not at the end of a period.
If XYZ invested $5,800 today in an account that is expected to earn 3.2 percent per year, and she expects to make another investment in the same account in 3 years from today, then how much money does XYZ expect to invest in 3 years if she expects to have $15,000 in her account in 4 years from today
Answer:
The answer is "$8,160.08".
Explanation:
[tex]A= \text{future value} = \$ 15,000 \\\\P= \text{present value}= \$ 5,800 \\\\r=\tex{rate} =3.2 \%\\\\n= \text{time in years} = 4[/tex]
Using formula:
[tex]A=P(1+ \frac{r}{100})^n + \text{Investment in 3 years} \times (1.032)\\\\15,000=5,800 (1+ \frac{3.2}{100})^4 + \text{Investment in 3 years} \times (1.032)\\\\15,000=5,800 (1+ 0.032)^4 + \text{Investment in 3 years} \times (1.032)\\\\15,000=5,800 (1.032)^4 + \text{Investment in 3 years} \times (1.032)\\\\[/tex]
[tex]15,000 = 5,800 \times 1.13427612 +\text{Investment in 3 years} \times (1.032)\\\\15,000=6,578.8015 + \text{Investment in 3 years} \times (1.032)\\\\\text{Investment in 3 years} = \frac{(15000-6578.8015)}{1.032}\\\\\text{Investment in 3 years} = \frac{8,421.1985}{1.032}\\\\\text{Investment in 3 years} = 8,160.07607\\\\ \text{Investment in 3 years} = 8,160. 08[/tex]
On 12/31/2020, Heaton Industries Inc. reported retained earnings of $675,000 on its balance sheet, and it reported that it had $172,500 of net income during the year. On its previous balance sheet, at 12/31/2019, the company had reported $555,000 of retained earnings. No shares were repurchased during 2020. How much in dividends did Heaton pay during 2020?
a. $47,381
b. $49,875
c. $57,881
d. $55,125
e. $52,500
Answer:
e. $52,500
Explanation:
Beginning balance of retained earnings= $555,000
Net earning for the period=$172,500
Closing retained earnings balance for the period: $675,000
Closing retained earning =Beginning balance + net earnings - dividend
$675000 = $555,000 +$172,500- Dividends
$675000 = $727,500 - Dividends
Dividends = $727,500 - $675,000
Dividends =$52,500
Compute the charitable contribution deduction (ignoring the percentage limitation) for each of the following C corporations. a. Amber Corporation donated inventory of clothing (basis of $24,000, fair market value of $30,000) to a qualified charitable organization that operates homeless shelters. $fill in the blank 9a9067069fa000e_1
Answer:
$27,000
Explanation:
Computation for the charitable contribution deduction
Using this formula
Charitable contribution deduction = (Adjusted basis )+[ 50% (Fair Value – Adjusted Basis)]
Let plug in the formula
Charitable contribution deduction= 24,000 + [50% (30,000 – 24,000)]
Charitable contribution deduction= 24,000+ (50%*6,000)
Charitable contribution deduction= 24,000+3,0000
Charitable contribution deduction = 27,000
Therefore the charitable contribution deduction will be $27,000
In January, Dieker Company requisitions raw materials for production as follows: Job 1 $960, Job 2 $1,400, Job 3 $760, and general factory use $620. Prepare a summary journal entry to record raw materials used. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered.
Answer:
Dr Work in Process Inventory $3,120
Dr Manufacturing Overhead $620
Cr Raw materials Inventory $3,740
Explanation:
Preparation of the summary of journal entry to record raw materials used.
Based on the information given the summary of journal entry to record raw materials used will be:
Dr Work in Process Inventory $3,120
(Job 1 $960+Job 2 $1,400+Job 3 $760)
Dr Manufacturing Overhead $620
Cr Raw materials Inventory $3,740
($3,120+$620)
(Being to record the record raw materials used)
Following is the income statement information from Apollo Medical Devices.
($ in thousands) 2020
Net sales $4,163,770
Cost of sales before special charges 1,382,235
Special inventory obsolescence charge 27,876
Total cost of sales 1,410,111
Gross profit 2,753,659
Selling, general and admin expense 1,570,667
Research and development expense 531,086
Merger and acquisition costs 46,914
In-process research and development charges 12,244
Litigation settlement 16,500
Operating profit 576,248
Interest expense (57,372)
Interest income 2,076
Gain on disposal of fixed assets 4,929
Impairment of marketable securities (5,222)
Other income (expense), net (2,857)
Earnings before income taxes 517,802
Income tax expense 191,587
Net earnings $326,215
Required: Identify the components that we would consider operating.
Answer:
$ in thousands) 2020
Net sales $4,163,770
Cost of sales before special charges 1,382,235
Special inventory obsolescence charge 27,876
Total cost of sales 1,410,111
Gross profit 2,753,659
Selling, general and admin expense 1,570,667
Research and development expense 531,086
Explanation:
Make-or-Buy Decision
Fremont Computer Company has been purchasing carrying cases for its portable computers at a purchase price of $40 per unit. The company, which is currently operating below full capacity, charges factory overhead to production at the rate of 25% of direct labor cost. The unit costs to produce comparable carrying cases are expected to be as follows:
Direct materials $16
Direct labor 20
Factory overhead (25% of direct labor) 5
Total cost per unit $41
If Fremont Computer Company manufactures the carrying cases, fixed factory overhead costs will not increase and variable factory overhead costs associated with the cases are expected to be 5% of the direct labor costs.
a. Prepare a differential analysis dated September 30 to determine whether the company should make (Alternative 1) or buy (Alternative 2) the carrying case. If an amount is zero, enter "0". If required, round your answers to two decimal places. Use a minus sign to indicate a loss.
Differential Analysis
Make Carrying Case (Alt. 1) or Buy Carrying Case (Alt. 2)
September 30
Make Carrying Case (Alternative 1) Buy Carrying Case (Alternative 2) Differential Effect on Income (Alternative 2)
Sales price $ $ $
Unit costs:
Purchase price
Direct materials
Direct labor
Variable factory overhead
Fixed factory overhead
Income (loss) $ $ $
b. Assuming there were no better alternative uses for the spare capacity, it would (Be advisable, Not be advisable) to manufacture the carrying cases. Fixed factory overhead is(Relevant, Irrelevant) to this decision.
Answer:
A. Make carrying case(Alternative 1) $41.00
Buy carrying case (Alternative 2)$44.00
Differential effect on net income (Alternative 2)($3.00)
B. Assuming there were no better alternative uses for the spare capacity, it would BE ADVISABLE to manufacture the CARRYING CASES. Fixed overhead is IRRELEVANT to this decision.
Explanation:
A. Preparation of a Differential Analysis
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Make carrying case Buy carrying case
(Alternative 1) (Alternative 2)
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Differential effect on net income (Alternative 2)
Sales price
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Purchase Price
$0.00 $40.00 ($40.00)
Direct materials
$16.00 $0.00 $16.00
Direct labor
$20.00 $0.00 $20.00
Variable manufacture overhead (20*5%=$1.00)
$1.00 $0.00 $1.00
Fixed manufacture overhead($5.00-$1.00) $4.00 $4.00 $0.00
Income(Loss)
$41.00 $44.00 ($3.00)
Based on the above calculation Alternative 1 which is carrying case should be Choose by the Company .
B. Therefore Assuming there were no better alternative uses for the spare capacity, it would BE ADVISABLE to manufacture the CARRYING CASES. Fixed overhead is IRRELEVANT to this decision.
At the end of 2016, burger food truck The Patty Wagon’s preliminary trial balance indicated a current ratio of 1.20. Management is contemplating paying some of its accounts payable balance before the end of the fiscal year. Explain the effect this transaction would have on the current ratio. Would your answer be the same if the preliminary trial balance indicated a current ratio of 0.8?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Lets assume that for current ratio to be 1.2, the current assets were $120000 and Current liabilities were $100000. [120000 / 100000 = 1.2]
Now, if say $20000 of accounts payable were paid, the new current ratio would be:
= ($120000 - $20000) / ($100000 - $20000)
= $100000 / $80000
= 1.25.
Hence, the current ratio would Increase and this should be encouraged.
If current ratio were 0.8, (Current Assets $ 80000 and Current Liabilities $ 100000, 80000 / 100000 = 0.8] and $ 20000 were paid, the new current ratio would be:
= ($80000 - $20000) / ($100000 - $20000)
= $60000 / $80000
= 0.75
Hence, the current ratio would Decrease. This should be discouraged.
Conclusion: No, the answer would not be the same if current ratio were 0.8 instead of 1.2.
Please answer !!! For a lot of points
Answer:
thanks for points
Explanation:
You've collected the following information about a company: Assets Liabilities and Equity Cash 13,000 Accounts payable 16,000 Marketable securities 2,000 Notes payable 6,000 Accounts receivable 4,000 Current liabilities Inventory 32,000 Long-term debt 95,000 Current assets Total liabilities Machines 34,000 Paid-in capital 20,000 Real estate 80,000 Retained earnings Fixed assets Equity Total assets Total liab. & equity Attempt 1/10 for 10 pts. Part 1 What are total assets? 165000 Correct ✓ Total assets are the sum of current and fixed assets. Assets Liabilities and Equity Cash 13,000 Accounts payable 16,000 Marketable securities 2,000 Notes payable 6,000 Accounts receivable 4,000 Current liabilities Inventory 32,000 Long-term debt 95,000 Current assets 51,000 Total liabilities Machines 34,000 Paid-in capital 20,000 Real estate 80,000 Retained earnings Fixed assets 114,000 Equity Total assets 165,000 Total liab. & equity Total assets = Current assets + Fixed assets = 51,000 + 114,000 = 165,000
Answer:
The answer is "$228,000"
Explanation:
Formula:
[tex]\text{Total Assets = Current Assets + Fixed Assets}[/tex]
[tex]= [\$ 13,000 + \$ 2,000 + \$ 4,000 + \$ 95,000] + [\$ 34,000 + \$ 80,000]\\\\= [\$ 114,000] + [\$ 114,000]\\\\= \$ 228,000[/tex]
What is the value of a building that is expected to generate fixed annual cash flows of $13,800 every year for a certain amount of time if the first annual cash flow is expected in 3 years from today and the last annual cash flow is expected in 8 years from today and the appropriate discount rate is 6.8 percent
Answer:
the present value is $58,026
Explanation:
The computation of the value of the building is shown below
Present value = Cash flows × Present value of discounting factor( interest rate%,time period)
= $13,800 ÷ 1.068^3 + $13,800 ÷ 1.068^4 + $13,800 ÷ 1.068^5 + $13,800 ÷ 1.068^6 + $13,800 ÷ 1.068^7 + $13,800 ÷ 1.068^8
= $58,026
Hence, the present value is $58,026
you are the accounts receivable clerk for fast and friendly shipping . the friendly shipping the balance of the accounts receivable account is $25,000 for six months you have been trying to collect the amount owned by three companies: ABC company, $450; XYZ company, $500; and nice try company, $350. these accounts are still unpaid. your supervisor asked you to write off these accounts using the direct write off method. what is the balance of accounts receivable after you write off these accounts as uncollective?
Answer:
Thats a lot of money
Explanation:
can I have some
How start a digital platform?
Answer:
Building an effective platform starts with building a single source of truth about an individual. If a company wants to able to treat people as individuals with their unique identity, it needs to build a single repository or database about that individual.
Explanation:
You bought an old car a couple of years ago for $1,000 and put about $5,000 of parts and labor into improving it. You sold it yesterday for $3,000. a. How does this sale affect GDP? GDP will increase by $3,000 as a result of this transaction. increase by $4,000 as a result of this transaction. not change as a result of this transaction. increase by $5,000 as a result of this transaction. b. Which option below explains why this transaction does or does not affect GDP? Selling a used car was already counted in a previous year's GDP. is counted as a final good in GDP. "added value" to the economy. is an economic transaction.
Answer:
I dont know i need help with this to
Selling a used car was already counted in a previous year's GDP.
GDP:A monetary indicator of the market worth of all the finished goods and services produced in a nation over a given time period is called the gross domestic product (GDP). To compare living standards between countries, using a basis of GDP per capita at purchasing power parity (PPP) may be more useful, whereas nominal GDP is more useful for comparing national economies on the global market. GDP (nominal) per capita does not, however, reflect differences in the cost of living and the inflation rates of the countries. The contribution of each industry or sector to the overall GDP can also be quantified.Therefore, the correct answer is that Selling a used car was already counted in a previous year's GDP.
Know more about GDP here:
https://brainly.com/question/1383956
#SPJ2
Bravo Industries intends to retire $950,000 in short-term debt using proceeds from the sale of 30,000 shares of common stock. The stock sells for $25 per share. How much of its short-term debt can Bravo exclude from current liabilities if the sale occurs after the balance sheet date but before the balance sheet issue
Answer:
the amount that should be excluded from the current liabilities is $750,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that should be excluded from the current liabilities is shown below;
= Number of shares in the common stock × selling price per share
= 30,000 shares × $25
= $750,000
Hence, the amount that should be excluded from the current liabilities is $750,000
Are marketing and sales the same in marketing
Answer:
marketing is building awareness of your organization and brand to potential customers. Sales is turning that viewership into a profit, by converting those potential customers into actual ones.
Explanation:
Johnson Company uses the allowance method to account for uncollectible accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is established as a percentage of credit sales. During the year, net credit sales totaled $600,000, and the estimated bad debt percentage is 2%. The allowance for uncollectible accounts had a credit balance of $5,600 at the beginning of the year and $4,700, after adjusting entries, at the end of the year. What is the amount of accounts receivable written off during the year
Answer:
$12,900
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount of accounts receivable written off during the year
Beginning Balance $5,600
Add Bad debt expense $12,000
(2% x $600,000)
Less End-of-year balance ($4,700)
Accounts receivable written off $12,900
($5,600+$12,000+$4,700)
Therefore the amount of accounts receivable written off during the year will be $12,900
Calculate the interest and total amount due at the end of the loan for both simple and compound interest. Loan YearsRate(a)$1,00025%(b)$1,50056%(c)$10,0001010%(d)$25,0001515%(e)$47,7502020%You should have 4 values for your final answer:1. Simple interest total amount duei. Simple interest total interest 2. Compound interest total amount due 3. Compound interest total interest
Solution :
a). Interest for the simple interest [tex]$= 1000 \times 5 \times 2$[/tex]
= $ 100
Amount due for the simple interest = $ 1000 + $ 100
= $ 1100
Amount due for the compound interest [tex]$= 1000 \times (1.05)^2$[/tex]
= $ 1102.50
Interest for the compound interest = $ 1102.50 - $ 1000
= $ 102.50
b). Interest for the simple interest [tex]$= 1500 \times 6 \times 5$[/tex]
= $ 450
Amount due for the simple interest = $ 1500 + $ 450
= $ 1950
Amount due for the compound interest [tex]$= 1500 \times (1.06)^5 $[/tex]
= $ 2007.34
Interest for the compound interest = $ 2007.34 - $ 1500
= $ 507.34
c). Interest for the simple interest [tex]$= 1000 \times 10 \times 10$[/tex]
= $ 100000
Amount due for the simple interest = $ 10000 + $ 10000
= $ 20000
Amount due for the compound interest [tex]$= 10000 \times (1.10)^{10}$[/tex]
= $ 25937.42
Interest for the compound interest = $ 25937.42 - $ 10000
= $ 15937.42
d). Interest for the simple interest [tex]$= 25000 \times 15 \times 15$[/tex]
= $ 56,2500
Amount due for the simple interest = $ 25000 + $ 56,250
= $ 81,250
Amount due for the compound interest [tex]$= 25000 \times (1.15)^{15} $[/tex]
= $ 203,426.54
Interest for the compound interest = $ 203,426.54 - $ 25,000
= $ 178,426.54
e). Interest for the simple interest [tex]$= 47,750 \times 20 \times 20$[/tex]
= $ 191,000
Amount due for the simple interest = $ 47,750 + $ 191,000
= $ 238,750
Amount due for the compound interest [tex]$= 47,750 \times (1.20)^{20} $[/tex]
= $ 1,830,620.40
Interest for the compound interest = $ 1,830,620.40 - $ 47,750
= $ 1,782,870.40
A company has $14,500,000 in taxable income. Consider the following corporate marginal tax rates: Taxable income ($) Tax rate 0- 50,000 15% 50,001- 75,000 25% 75,001- 100,000 34% 100,001- 335,000 39% 335,001- 10,000,000 34% 10,000,001- 15,000,000 35% 15,000,001- 18,333,333 38% 18,333,334+ 35% Attempt 1/10 for 10 pts. Part 1 What is the marginal tax rate for the company?
Answer: 35%
Explanation:
The marginal corporate tax rate is the added tax amount that a company pays for every additional dollar that it makes as income.
It is given in ranges which show the rate to be paid for the amount of income earned by the company.
This company earned $14,500,000 in taxable income and so will fall under the 10,000,001- 15,000,000 bracket which means that their marginal tax rate is 35%.
MECCS Inc. has net income of $3,492, interest expense of $172, sales of $7,290, addition to retained earnings of $1,596, selling and general expenses of $1,820, and depreciation of $990. What is the amount of dividends paid if the tax rate is 21 percent
Answer: $1,896
Explanation:
The amount of net income that is retained is determined by the amount of dividends paid in the formula:
= Net income - Retained earnings
= 3,492 - 1,596
= $1,896
Taxes and expenses would have already been catered for in the Net income.
On January 1, 2020, Scottsdale Company issued its 11% bonds in the face amount of $3,000,000, which mature on January 1, 2030. The bonds were issued for $$3,385,058 to yield 9%. Scottsdale uses the effective-interest method of amortizing bond premium. Interest is payable annually on December 31. The 12/31/23 Premium on Bond Payable balance is:
Answer:
$269,153
Explanation:
Dr Cash 3,385,058
Cr Bonds payable 3,000,000
Cr Premium on bonds payable 385,058
premium amortization year 1 = ($3,385,058 x 9%) - $330,000 = $304,655 - $330,000 = -$25,345
premium amortization year 2 = ($3,359,713 x 9%) - $330,000 = -$27,626
premium amortization year 3 = ($3,332,087 x 9%) - $330,000 = -$30,112
premium amortization year 4 = ($3,301,975 x 9%) - $330,000 = -$32,822
premium's balance = $269,153
Consider the following company balance sheet and income statement.Balance Sheet:Assets Liabilities and EquityCash $4,000 Accounts payable $30,000Accounts receivable 52,000 Notes payable 12,000Inventory 40,000 Total current liabilities 42,000Total current assets 96,000 Long-term debt 36,000Fixed assets 44,000 Equity 62,000Total assets $140,000 Total liabilities and equity $140,000 Income StatementSales (all on credit) $200,000Cost of goods sold 130,000Gross margin 70,000Selling and administrative expenses 20,000Depreciation 8,000EBIT 42,000Interest expense 4,800Earning before tax 37,200Taxes 11,160Net income $26,040 For this company, calculate the following: Current Ratio Cash flow to Debt services ratio Debt to Assets ratio What additional information would you need to determine whether or not to make a loan to this company
Answer:
Current Ratio = Current assets/Current liabilities
= 96,000/42,000
= 2.29
Cash flow to Debt services ratio = Ending Cash/Interest Expense
= $4,000/$4,800 = 0.833
Debt to Assets ratio = Total liabilities/Total assets
=$58,000/$140,000
= 0.41
The previous year's financial statements would enable one to properly calculate the cash flow to debt service ratio. The figures used in this situation were approximations of the correct figures.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Balance Sheet:
Assets Liabilities and Equity
Cash $4,000 Accounts payable $30,000
Accounts receivable 52,000 Notes payable 12,000
Inventory 40,000 Total current liabilities 42,000
Total current assets 96,000 Long-term debt 36,000
Fixed assets 44,000 Equity 62,000
Total assets $140,000 Total liabilities and equity $140,000
Income Statement
Sales (all on credit) $200,000
Cost of goods sold 130,000
Gross margin 70,000
Selling and administrative expenses 20,000
Depreciation 8,000
EBIT 42,000
Interest expense 4,800
Earning before tax 37,200
Taxes 11,160
Net income $26,040
Current Ratio = Current assets/Current liabilities
= 96,000/42,000
= 2.29
Cash flow to Debt services ratio = Ending Cash/Interest Expense
= $4,000/$4,800 = 0.833
Debt to Assets ratio = Total liabilities/Total assets
=$58,000/$140,000
= 0.41
Reeves Co. filed suit against Higgins, Inc., seeking damages for copyright violations. Higgins' legal counsel believes it is probable that Higgins will settle the lawsuit for an estimated amount in the range of $170,000 to $270,000, with all amounts in the range considered equally likely. How should Higgins report this litigation
Answer:
As a liability for the minimum amount of $170,000 along with disclosure of the range
Explanation:
Based on the information given Higgins should report this litigation as a LIABILITY for the amount of $170,000 along with disclosure of the range reason been that we were told he will settle the lawsuit with an amount in the range of $170,000 to $270,000 in which all the amounts in the range are considered to be both equally likely which therefore means that he will have to record the LIABILITY at the amount of $170,000 which is appear to be the minimum amount in the range.
Therefore Higgins should report this litigation As a liability for the minimum amount of $170,000 along with disclosure of the range.
A general partner Group of answer choices cannot lose more than the amount of his/her equity investment. has more management responsibility than a limited partner. is the term applied only to corporations that invest in partnerships. faces double taxation whereas a limited partner does not.
Answer:
has more management responsibility than a limited partner
Explanation:
General partner can be regarded as a
person who joins with another individual of one or more to form a business. The action of the business is the responsibility of a general partner, he/she can bind the business legally. Debts as well as obligations in the business is liable to him/her. It should be noted that A general partner has more management responsibility than a limited partner.
What would you do if you got conflicting answers for the same procedure from two different people you interviewed? What would you do if one was a clerical person and the other was the department manager?
Answer:
The best solution will be to get the two individuals together to try and get a solution that is agreeable between two of them.
Explanation:
The role of a system analyst is not to make a decision about the best procedure to use, rather it is the responsibility of the users to do so.
The analyst is to facilitate a common ground that takes into consideration all views.
In the given scenario the department manager may be privy to information that the clerical person does not have. This will give a better view of processes that will be in line with business goals and objectives.
However the clerical staff pays more attention to details of business procedures. He is most likely more updated on business procedure that the department head.
The best way forward is the get the two of them together to trash out the differences of their procedures and come up with one that takes the managerial view of the department head and the detail oriented view of the clerical staff into consideration
The role of the system analyst is not to decide on the best method to use, rather it is the responsibility to come up with a common viewpoint where both their opinions can be considered.
What are the responsibilities of a System Analyst?A systems analyst is a person who uses analytical and design techniques to solve business problems using information technology.
System analysts can act as agents of change who identify organizational improvements needed, design systems to implement those changes, and train and motivate others to use the systems.
The analyst is to facilitate a consensus that takes into account all the ideas.
In this case, the department head may be aware of information that the pastor does not have. This will give you a better idea of the processes that will align with the goals and objectives of the business.
However, clerical staff pays close attention to details of business processes. The clerk may know more about the business processes head of a department.
The best way forward is to bring the two together to eliminate the differences in their procedures, it is the system analyst's responsibility to come up with a common viewpoint where both their opinions can be considered.
To learn more about role of system analyst, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/25488537
A merger of two firms may increase economic efficiency by A decreasing average total cost through an increase in economies of scale B decreasing output to reduce marginal cost and equalize price C increasing economic profits but decreasing consumer surplus D increasing consumer surplus by decreasing economic profits E increasing consumer surplus by shifting the demand curve for the product to the right
Answer:
A decreasing average total cost through an increase in economies of scale
Explanation:
In the case when two firms would be merged so this would rise in economic efficiency this would result in reduction in the average total cost via rise in the economies of scale
So according to the given situation, the option A is correct
And the remaining options are incorrect
The same would be relevant
A merger of two firms may increase economic efficiency by decreasing average total cost through an increase in economies of scale. Thus, option (a) is correct.
When a bigger company with more output can lower average costs, economies of scale happen. Prices for customers can be reduced thanks to decreased average costs.
A merger can help a business grow in size and benefit from a variety of reasons, including financial economies, organizational economies, technological economies, and economies of scale when purchasing goods.
A merger can result in increased earnings for the company by lowering expenses, which can then be put toward R&D expenditures, enhancing product quality, and commercial expansion.
As a result, the significance of the merger of two firms may increase economic efficiency are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on economic efficiency, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30053857
#SPJ6
New Hampshire adopted a tax law that in effect taxed the income of nonresidents working in New Hampshire only. Austin, a nonresident who worked in New Hampshire, claimed that the tax law was invalid. Was he correct
Answer:
He was correct. It violates equal protection, as this only applies to non-residents.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about New Hampshire which adopted a tax law that in effect taxed the income of nonresidents working in New Hampshire only. Austin, a nonresident who worked in New Hampshire, claimed that the tax law was invalid. In this case, He was correct since It violates equal protection, as this only applies to non-residents. Income Tax Act can be regarded as an act that governs tax charged which applies to income of individuals, body of individuals as well as famies. The Section 1 of this Act state that tax is an obligation that needed to be fulfilled to State Inland Revenue Service in as much the the individual resides there.