helppppp please I will give brainliest​

Answer:

9 hours or less. with a $3 off coupon she could spend up to $54. divide that by $6 per hour and that gives you a possibility of nine hours of boat rental.

Answer:

140

Explanation:

an=-12+4(n-2)

an=-12+4([40]-2)

an=-12+4(38)

an=-152-12

an=140

The 40th term in the sequence defined by aₙ= -12+4(n-2) is 140

using AP formula,

aₙ = a + (n - 1)d

where

a = first term

d = common difference

n = number of terms

Therefore,

aₙ = -12 + 4(n-2)

n = 40

a₄₀ = -12 + 4(40 - 2)

a₄₀ = -12 + 4(38)

a₄₀ = -12 + 152

a₄₀ = 140

The 40th term of the sequence is 140.

learn more about arithmetic progression here: https://brainly.com/question/22069667?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

27

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes, by 27 times

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope it helps you

Answer is : A .. Hope it helped

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

==================

Let the parts be x, y and z

As per given we get below system of equations:

Substitute 0.1x + 0.2y in the second equation:

Now we have:

and

Multiply the second equation and then subtract the first one:

Then

So the parts are:

Answer:

It’s 40 I’m pretty sure because of the square. That’s how I was taught.

Answer:

(a) What percent of all field goal attempts did Seth Fitzgerald make? (Enter your answers rounded to two decimal places.)

Seth Fitzgerald's overall field goal percentage:__59.69%_____

What percent of all field goal attempts did Roberto Mantovani make? (Enter your answers rounded to two decimal places.)

Roberto Mantovani's overall field goal percentage: ______40.31%________.

(b) Find the percent of all two-point field goals and all three-point field goals that both Seth and Roberto made. (Enter your answers rounded to two decimal places.)

Seth Fitzgerald's two-pointers: _____58.57%_________%

Roberto Mantovani's two-pointers:_____41.43%______ %

Seth Fitzgerald's three-pointers:_____64.58%_______

Roberto Mantovani's three-pointers:_____35.42%_____

(c) Roberto had a lower percent than Seth for both types of field goals, but had a better overall percent. That sounds impossible, select the correct statement concerning the situation.

i) This is an example of Simpson's paradox. The comparison that holds for both field goal groups is reversed when the groups are combined into one group

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Benedict College 2014-2020 men's basketball team:

                               Seth Fitzgerald   Roberto Mantovani        Total

                               Made  Missed        Made   Missed       Made    Missed

Two-pointers          123         118              87           84           210        205

Three-pointers         31            6              17              2            48             8

Total                       154         124           104            86          258        210

a) All field goal attempts = 258 (154 + 104)

Field goal attempts by Seth Fitzgerald = 154/258 * 100 = 59.69%

Goal 154 - 124 = 30/258 * 100 = 11.63%

Roberto Mantovani = 104/258*100 = 40.31%

Goal 104 - 86 = 18/258 *100 = 6.98%

Percent of all two-point field goals and all three-point field goals that both Seth and Roberto made:

Goals by both = 48 (30 + 18) = 48/258*100 = 18.61 (11.63 + 6.98)

Seth Fitzgerald's two-pointers = 123/210*100 = 58.57%

Roberto Mantovani's two-pointers = 87/210*100 = 41.43%

Seth Fitzgerald's three-pointers = 31/48*100 = 64.58%

Roberto Mantovani's three-pointers = 17/48*100 = 35.42%

b) Simpson's paradox, also called Yule-Simpson effect, says that when we combine all of the groups together (e.g. two-pointer and three-pointer games played by Seth and Roberto respectively) and look at the data in total form, the correlation that we noticed before may reverse itself.  The cause of this reversion is lurking variables or numerical values of the data.

Answer:

105

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = = -5 ; y = -1 ; z = 4      [tex]\bigg | = 3 \bigg |[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of the plane through (1,-4,0) is,

a(x-1) + b(y+4) + c(z+0) = 0 ....... (1)

Again the plane is perpendicular to the vector (5,1,-4)

So, the direction ratios of the normal to the plane is proportional to the direction ratios of the vector (5,1,-4)

So, a/(5) = b/(1) = c/(-4 )

Let,a/(5) = b/(1) = c/(-4 ) = k

So, a = 5k, b = k and c = -4k

So, from (1) we have,

(5k)(x-1) + (k)(y+4) + (-4k)(z+0) = 0

Thus;

-5(x-1) -(y+4) +4(z+0) = 0

So,

-5x +1 -y-4+4z+0 =0

-5x - y +4z -3 = 0

-5x - y +4z = 3

x = = -5 ; y = -1 ; z = 4      [tex]\bigg | = 3 \bigg |[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2 3/4 ÷ 4 1/8

23/4×8/41

23×8/4×41

46/41

=1.122

So the answer is 1.122

The solution after divide 2 3/4 by 4 1/8 in fraction form is,

⇒ 2/3

We have to given that,

To divide 2 3/4 by 4 1/8.

Simplify it as,

2 3/4 ÷ 4 1/8

11/4 ÷ 33/8

11/4 x 8/33

(11 x 8) / (4x33)

2/3

Therefore, The solution after divide 2 3/4 by 4 1/8 in fraction form is,

⇒ 2/3

Learn more about the divide visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28119824

#SPJ6

The equation of the line of best fit that Brianna drew is: c. y = 2x + 5

Recall:

Thus:

Slope of a line (m) = change in y/change in x

Change in y = 2 units

Change in x = 1 unit

Slope = 2/1 = 2

The y-intercept is the point where the line of best fit intercepts the y-axis which is at y = 5.

y-intercept (b) = 5

Substitute b = 5 and m = 2 into y = mx + b

y = 2x + 5

Learn more about line of best fit on:

https://brainly.com/question/17143626

Answer:

c    ..)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.35

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$13.92

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

Sorry to lazy to type

Calculation is up

Answer:

The answer to your question will be 9, sorry that im late!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It does!

Step-by-step explanation:

A linear function has one independent variable and one dependent variable. The independent variable is x and the dependent variable is y.

Source: Columbia.edu

(I'm greedy and want points )

Answer:

sbsjsjsvshwjbqvsjanavshsjsnsbsvsbsbsbssv d sms and avjaaush e as his new s snwqlpasn s w

Answer:

the answer is 68

Answer:

(red shirt people) r - 4[tex]\sqrt[3]{b}[/tex] (blue shirt people)

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't know if you want an equation or an exact answer. I have an equation though.

I got this answer like this:

4 less is minus 4

triple is multiplication and/or times

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  $98.11

Step-by-step explanation:

If your calculator doesn't work with mixed numbers, you must first convert 6 5/8% to a decimal fraction.

  6 5/8 = (6·8+5)/8 = 53/8 = 6.625

  6 5/8% = 0.01×6.625 = 0.06625

Then the desired amount is ...

  0.06625 × $1480.90 = $98.109625 ≈ $98.11

6 5/8% of $1,480.90 is $98.11.

Answer:

<

Step-by-step explanation:

7 2/5 = 37/5

7 3/5 = 52/7

~~~~~~~~~~~

37/5 times 7 = 259/35

52/7 times 5 = 260/35

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Subtract then you difference is one, therefor 7 3/5 is greater.

Answer:

1.11.83

2. 20.12

3. 28.28

4. 33.91

5.80.62

6.24.08

7.17.32

8. 15.81

9. 16.85

10. 28.18

Step-by-step explanation:

pls make me brainliest

Answer: Hmm this question was very hard.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

9x is equal to 9 multiplied by x.

x=4 so it is 9 x 4

9 x 4=36

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Option A. 0.296 and 0.9888 is correct because rational no are terminating and repeating ..

417

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps :)

Answer:

Jim walked 17/28 for miles than Russel

Step-by-step explanation:

First you turn 6/7 and 1/4 to have the same denominators. In that case you find the least common multiple which is 28.

7: 7, 14, 21, 28

4: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28

Next you multiply the top and the bottom of your fraction my the factor you used to get 28 for your denominator

6/7 x 4/4 = 24/28

1/4 x 7/7 = 7/28

Lastly, you subtract the products you got.

24/28 - 7/28 = 17/28

Answer:

I think the time taken will be 1/3 of what the time is now since the time of the car is tripled.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

divide time by 3 since time&speed are directly proprtional

Step-by-step explanation:

so there.

Answer:

Test statistic Z= 1.713

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

A researcher wants to test if the mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is

different from $110,000

Mean of the Population  μ = $110,000

Sample size 'n' = 53

Mean of the sample x⁻ = $114,000.

standard deviation of the Population = $17,000,

Level of significance = 0.01

Null hypothesis :

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

H₀:  x⁻ =  μ

Alternative Hypothesis :  x⁻ ≠  μ

Step(ii):-

Test statistic

                 [tex]Z = \frac{x^{-}-mean }{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

                 [tex]Z = \frac{114000-110000}{\frac{17000}{\sqrt{53} } }[/tex]

                Z =  1.7130

Tabulated value Z = 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000