in the 1800s some politicians wanted american indians to adopt white culture. this idea was called​

Answer:

Why does conflict develop? in The Final Years

Explanation:

The world has transformed rapidly in the decade since the end of the Cold War. An old system is gone and, although it is easy to identify what has changed, it is not yet clear that a new system has taken its place. Old patterns have come unstuck, and if new patterns are emerging, it is still too soon to define them clearly. The list of potentially epoch-making changes is familiar by now: the end of an era of bipolarity, a new wave of democratization, increasing globalization of information and economic power, more frequent efforts at international coordination of security policy, a rash of sometimes-violent expressions of claims to rights based on cultural identity, and a redefinition of sovereignty that imposes on states new responsibilities to their citizens and the world community.1

These transformations are changing much in the world, including, it seems, the shape of organized violence and the ways in which governments and others try to set its limits. One indication of change is the noteworthy decrease in the frequency and death toll of international wars in the 1990s. Subnational ethnic and religious conflicts, however, have been so intense that the first post-Cold War decade was marked by enough deadly lower-intensity conflicts to make it the bloodiest since the advent of nuclear weapons (Wallensteen and Sollenberg, 1996). It is still too soon to tell whether this shift in the most lethal type of warfare is a lasting change: the continued presence of contested borders between militarily potent states—in Korea, Kashmir, Taiwan, and the Middle East—gives reason to postpone judgment. It seems likely, though, that efforts to pre-

Page 2

Suggested Citation:"Conflict Resolution in a Changing World." National Research Council. 2000. International Conflict Resolution After the Cold War. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9897.×

Add a note to your bookmark

vent outbreaks in such hot spots will take different forms in the changed international situation.

A potentially revolutionary change in world politics has been a de facto redefinition of “international conflict.” International conflict still includes the old-fashioned war, a violent confrontation between nation states acting through their own armed forces or proxies with at least one state fighting outside its borders. But now some conflicts are treated as threats to international peace and security even if two states are not fighting. Particularly when internal conflicts involve violations of universal norms such as self-determination, human rights, or democratic governance, concerted international actions—including the threat or use of force—are being taken to prevent, conclude, or resolve them just as they sometimes have been for old-fashioned wars. In this sense some conflicts within a country’s borders are being treated as international.

There are various prominent recent examples. They include the delayed international military responses to genocide in Rwanda, ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, and repression in East Timor; the unprecedented military response of NATO to repression in Kosovo; the establishment and enforcement of no-fly zones in Iraq; and the use of economic sanctions against South Africa and Yugoslavia. Threatened or enacted coups d’état against democratically established governments have also sometimes been treated as international conflicts, as in Haiti. Similarly, threats of the violent dissolution of states or of their dissolution into violence have triggered international concern, as in Bosnia, Albania, and Somalia.

How important are such recent developments? In particular, do they make any important difference in how the actors on the world scene should deal with international conflicts? Do the tools developed for managing international conflicts under the old world system still apply? Are they best applied in new ways or by new entities? Are there new tools that are more appropriate for the new conditions? How do the old and new tools relate to each other?

This book is devoted to examining these questions. This chapter begins the examination by identifying the major strategies of conflict resolution, old and new, that are relevant in the emerging world system. We use the term conflict resolution broadly to refer to efforts to prevent or mitigate violence resulting from intergroup or interstate conflict, as well as efforts to reduce the underlying disagreements. We presume that conflict between social groups is an inevitably recurring fact of life and that the goal of conflict resolution is to keep conflicts channeled within a set of agreed norms that foster peaceful discussion of differences, proscribe violence as a means of settling disputes, and establish rules for the limited kinds of violence that are condoned (e.g., as punishment for violations of codes of criminal conduct)

Answer:

Buddhism is a non-theistic religion (no belief in a creator god), also considered a philosophy and a moral discipline, originating in India in the 6th and 5th centuries BCE. It was founded by the sage Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha l. c. 563 - c

Explanation:

Answer:

The white settlers kept taking the Native's land, and they did not accept it. In Florida, the Seminols fought a guerilla war against the Americans, although they were forced to surrender and move to lands west of the Missisippi.

Answer:

yes? that's correct, but what's the question?

Answer:

1)I wonder if there are and how many other universes are out the in space

2) I wonder if other planets are livable but scientist just haven’t discovered them yet

3) I wonder how many astronauts have been to space in total

Explanation:

Answer:

this term refers to incidents when native africans killed white people who were seen as the white devil

Answer:

Answer:

This term refers to the dangers Europeans faced in Africa's interior due to disease, wild animals, and hostile tribes.

Explanation:

i took the test and i said this, and i got it correct

Answer:

c.Constituents

Explanation:

The people the Congressperson actually represent are known as constituents.

These constituents are those that are being directly represented in Congress by a Congressperson and who is expected to bring up issues that affect them and how to improve their standard of living.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

i wach mr beast

Answer:

It protected citizen ship of anyone born in america

Answer:

Everyone born in America had equal protection of law.

Explanation:

Answer:

Suny: That is the central question of my forthcoming book. There is a tendency on the part of some scholars - particularly Armenians - not to try to explain the genocide because – “why do you need to explain it? These are Turks, this is what they do, and this is the kind of regime it was.” Or, slightly more sophisticated – “oh, it's Christians and Muslims – they are inevitably in conflict.” Or — “it's clashes of nationalism.” Now for me, religion, nationalism, the nature of Turkish culture, Ottoman society, the state - all of these are the questionsto be asked, not the answers. That is, they need to be investigated. The way I would explain this genocide, and I think it has relevance for other kinds of ethnic cleansings and mass killings, is that the regime developed what I call an “affective disposition” - that is, an emotional understanding of who the enemy was. They constructed the Armenians as an existential threat to the Ottoman Empire and to the Turkish nation, what they conceived as the Turkish nation at that time. I try to explain the origins of this affective disposition - this mental universe - in which emotion, fear, anger, and resentment combined to create an image of Armenians. Armenians originally had been thought of as a loyal millet, but after 1878 the Armenians became an instrument of certain foreign powers to intervene in the Ottoman regime and internal policy — the Ottomans began to see them as a threat.

Remind us what happened in 1878.

This was the Russian-Turkish War of 1877-1878. The Russians beat the Turks, and they were going to impose reforms on the Ottoman Empire, and that was the beginning of the new “Armenian question” that continued right up to the war. Now, some people would say "well, you don't need to go into emotions - it was a perfectly strategic, rational choice. The Armenians were actually a threat in World War I, and the Turks decided to get rid of them for national security reasons.” My view is that's an insufficient explanation. Why did they see them as a threat? A threat is always a perception. It's about emotion, it's about understanding, feeling, sentiment, and construction - both cognitive and emotional construction. I'm taking a step backwards to see how they got into the position that they could imagine people this way and then carry out the worst possible kinds of things. I’m bringing emotion into it.

By some accounts, Armenians sided with Russia at the beginning of World War I —was that something the Ottomans could point to that the Armenians were a threat?

This is the problem. You can't say the Armenians sided with Russia. That is what the Ottomans would say, and they perceived that. So there are people who try to justify what the Ottomans did to the Armenians by saying they were with the enemy. What I try to show in the book is that the overwhelming majority of Ottoman Armenians wanted to stay in the Empire, but they also wanted reforms to protect them and allow them to prosper. They wanted Kurdish predations against Armenians to be contained, for example. The Ottoman government was opposed to these reforms, but ultimately had to agree to them in February 1914. When the war came, though, they used the first opportunity to get rid of them. I’ll give you an example. As the Ottomans are going to war, they mobilize the population. Hundreds and thousands of young Armenian men are drafted and join the Ottoman army. A few desert and go over to the Russian side. Some prominent leaders go over to the Russian side. The Russians form Armenian voluntary units on the Caucasian side against the Ottomans, but the Turks see this as treachery and demobilize hundreds of thousands of Armenian soldiers, take their weapons and uniforms away, turn them into labor battalions, and eventually murder them. So it's a very different thing. It's not that there wasn't sympathy among some for Russia, but there was also no particular love for Russia. Russians didn't like the Armenian nationalist revolutionaries any more than the Turks did so they were persecuting them as well. The Armenians were in an unfortunate position - in Persia, in Russia, and in Turkey. They were like the Kurds today.

Answer: if talking about a map, the answer should be compass

Explanation:

Answer:

Slave owners did not pay slaves for their work

Explanation:

I took the test and this is the correct answer!

Answer:

B

Explanation:

It was D on my version... So technically B from the answers given.

Answer:

Over a thousand years after Abraham, the Jews were living as slaves in Egypt. Their leader was a prophet called Moses. Moses led the Jews out of slavery in Egypt and led them to the Holy Land that God had promised them. The escape of the Jews from Egypt is remembered by Jews every year in the festival of Passov

Answer:

The contributions of Moses to the ancient Israelites is that the Hebrews were living as slaves in Egypt. Moses was their leader. Moses led the Hebrews or the ancient Israelites out of slavery in Egypt. Moses then led his people through the desert for forty years, so the younger generation reaches the promised land of Canaan. The escape of the Israelites is remembered by Jews otherwise known as the Hebrews every year in the festival of Passover. As Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt, he was called by God to the top of Mount Sinai, where he received the Ten Commandments. Moses receives the commandments and also receives instructions for the ark of the covenant and tabernacle which will house God's presence among the people.

Hope this helps!! Have a great rest of your day ...

Answer:

Had to have like 3000 people in it or something

Explanation:

Answer:

congress setting up a government for the territory

Ex planation:

It's right I'm taking the test and It is right.

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

You didn't give the options and I couldn't find a particular question relating to your question but let me help out.

Some of the challenges that migrants face include:

• Housing challenges: Finding a home can be tough for migrants. Based on the fact that they are new and don't know much about the housing market, thus may tend to be a problem.

• Language barriers: One of the most important thing when one moves to a new environment is the language which will be used in communication.

Migrants move to another country so as to better their life and language can be a barrier when they eventually get to such countries.

• Employment opportunities: Another issue is with regards to employment. Migrants may realise that it hard to get suitable jobs.

• Access to local services: Immigrants also face difficulties in accessing the local service such as social services, health care, and legal advice.

• Cultural differences: This can also be a problem as immigrants face cultural difference especially when they are moving to a place where their culture is totally different from theirs.

Answer:

In the USA government, it's the executive branch of the USA government.

Answer:

citizens and specialized businesses

Explanation:

Answer:

-women

Explanation:

"During WWII women worked in factories producing munitions, building ships, aeroplanes, in the auxiliary services as air-raid wardens, fire officers and evacuation officers, as drivers of fire engines, trains and trams, as conductors and as nurses."

hope it helps:)

Answer:

Its A.

Explanation:

Answer:

A is correct

Explanation:

Cattaracts are normally made in war's to hide under and use guns to shoot. normall people dont just go on the field and start shooting randomaly, so they made cattracts to provide ,poretection and distance from enemies. Not only that but they proivded A LOT of farmland and space to help vegetaion grow

Hope this helps and pls mark brainlest!

Answer:

They were both great presidents, but I'm going to side with James Monroe. President James Monroe had the best foreign policy for the United States in the early 1800s. A policy called the Monroe Doctrine was issued by President James Monroe in favor of the new Latin American states, which warned European nations to honor the independence of the former colonies of Spain. The Monroe Doctrine created a strong nation in the United States, able to stand up for its own rights and that of its neighbors. Monroe’s policy showed how strong and independent the U.S was, but it also supported others who were seeking independence. The Era of Good Feelings was a name for President Monroe's two terms, a period of strong nationalism, economic growth, and territorial expansion. Since the Federalist party dissolved after the War of 1812, there was only one political party and no partisan conflicts.

Answer:

D.analyze the cost and benefits of an economic choice

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

Some of the core principles in the United States of America include separation of power, limited government, checks and balances, sovereignty, and federalism.

According to the separation of powers, the government in an economy is divides into three main sectors which are the executive who carries out laws, legislative who makes the laws. and the judicial branch, who interprets the law.

It's been crucial in the shaping of the government as everyone has a role

Answer:

D. Rule of law​

Explanation:

States that all people in a country, regardless of rank or status, should be held to the same legal standards.

Answer:India is often called a subcontinent because it is a distinct landmass, not just a country. ... Due to continental drift, India moved north and became part of Asia. India is now joined with the continent of Asia, but is a distinct area separated by the Himalayas.

Explanation:dia has a monsoon type of climate as its climate is influenced by the monsoon winds. The monsoon type of climate is based on distinct season and season of reversal of monsoon winds. This happens due to the differential heating of land and water bodies and pressure situations

Answer:

The Columbian exchange

Explanation:

The exchanging of goods, plants and animals from New World to Old is called Columbian Exchange.

With the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus in 1492, led the beginning of the Columbian Exchange. The European not only traded goods but brought diseases in the New World. Native Americans were affected the most by the exchange. The spread of diseases surprised because it finished almost all the early civilization in America. The Native American died with chickenpox, smallpox, malaria, cholera, measles, and scarlet fever.

Answer:

Explanation:

Genghis Khan was one of the greatest conquerors to ever exist and under him, the Mongols became a fearsome empire that brought terror to Asia and Europe but at the same time facilitated trade and security.

Genghis was able to unite the different Mongol tribes in two ways: first he promoted people based on merit instead of family ties and rank and this led to a more efficient running of the empire.

Second, when he conquered clans, he would remove their leaders and take in the lower classes into his clan thereby making them feel loved and earning him their loyalty.

Answer:

Listing:

1- promoting based on merit rather than family position.

2- brought lower classes of conquered people into own tribe.

Full Sentence:

The two innovations he used to win the civil war were the promotion of people based on merit rather than family position and he brought lower classes of conquered people into his own tribe while dispossessing the leaders of the conquered clans.

- JK Mitsu

#SpreadTheLove

PS.

I would love if you marked me brainliest!