Answer:
The new Japanese constitution change the role of the emperor as he was forced to declare he did not have divine power. The sovereign of the country became famous and symbolic as a representation of the culture and society of the country. The emperor was obligatory to announce he did not have a higher power.
Explanation:
Answer:
its B
Explanation:
Use the internet to look
up the following Genocides and tell me the dates
of the genocide, which group was targeted and
the number of people killed:
- Athenian Genocide
-Namibian Genocide
-Rwandan Genocide
Answer:
Athenian Genocide : 1913-1922
Target : Greek Population
Deaths : 300,000 to 900,000
Namibian Genocide : 1904-1907
Deaths : 24,000 to 100, 000
Target : Herero and Namaqua people
Rwandan Genocide : 7 April – 15 July 1994
Target : Tutsi population, Twa, and moderate Hutus
Deaths : 500,000 to 600,000
Answer: Athenian Genocide- In the summer of 416 BCE, Deaths- 300,000–900,000, and the Greek population, particularly from Pontus, Cappadocia, Ionia and Eastern Thrace was there target.
Namibian Genocide- 1904-1908, Tens of thousands of Namibians (the first genocide of the 20th Century) were killed. There target was German.
Rwandan Genocide- April 7, 1994 - 15 July 1994, Deaths: 206,000–800,000, target: Tutsi population, Twa, and moderate Hutus
Explanation:
Describe several ways that personal and government budgeting are similar. In addition, explain one important way they
are different.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The several ways that personal and government budgeting are similar in the following way.
Both budgets are necessary to project the series of expenses needed to make in the short, medium, and long-term. Both, the government and the personal government clearly establish how much money you have to spend when you need to spend it, the limit of money to be spent in a certain period of time, and the concept of the expenditure.
One important way they are different is the large numbers of each budget. A personal budget is about our income and how to spend it correctly so we do don create personal financial problems. On the other hand, the budget of the government is about trillions of dollars. Large sums of money have to be destined to all the important departments of the federal government, the states, and social programs.
If the federal government does not follow strict rules and parameters to respect the budget, in the end, it has to loan money which will generate more debt.
Question 2
Now, fill the gaps in your knowledge of the US and UK health care systems. Think of something you would like to know about the two systems. Compose a research question about the topic, and then answer the questions below.
Part A
What is your first research question?
The research question I would asked is why is the US health care systems run by private sector and the UK health care systems run by the Government.
How is the US healthcare system different from the UK healthcare system?The United States is known to be run by private sector and they often spend a lot of money on health care than any other countries of the world.
The UK is known to be at the bottom among industrial countries in terms of Healthcare. Healthcare in the U.S. is said to be delivered in almost all percentage by private sector providers. Hospitals are said to be owned by profit firms and also by non-profit and charitable organizations.
Learn more about research question from
https://brainly.com/question/25257437
What is the name for an order a higher court issues to a lower court to obtain the records of a lower court in a particular case
Answer An order issued by the Supreme Court directing the lower court to transmit records for a case for which it will hear on appeal.
hope this helps
what was the pros and cons of herbet hoover's presidency
Answer:
QUESTION:
What were the pros and cons of Herbet Hoover's presidency?
ANSWER:
I read what's in this article. And I think that it will help you out. Here's the link: https://epikfails.com/2017/07/07/presidential-pros-cons-part-eight/
Explanation:
I hope that this helps you out! :)
Have a great rest of your day/night!
Please thank me on my profile if this answer has helped you out.
The voting rights act of 196 5 band which of the following examples of voting restrictions
Answer:Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Definition, Summary & Significance - HISTORY band
Explanation:
look at the picture. please help me! :(
Answer:
the US millitary
Explanation:
The U.S military was first
Help it’s for a test!!
The fill in the blank is above in the picture! ^
Will give Brainly if correct!!
Word Back:
Consuls
veto
Patricians
tribunes
dictator
life
Plebeians
6 months
2
1 year
3
100 Points PLEASE HURRY
Was the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson fair? Should he have been removed from office?
Your post should list at least 3 reasons that support your argument.
Brainliest will go to the person who actually answers the question.
Answer:
Explanation:
On January 15, 1868, George Templeton Strong, a New York attorney, read the report from the country's capital and wrote in his journal, "Undertakings at Washington look blustery. A sad blast or something to that affect is entirely conceivable." It "makes up," he stated, "a compromising possibility."
It very well may be said that Strong was thinking little of the circumstance. The House of Representatives was going to arraign a leader of the United States, Andrew Johnson, for "egregious acts of misconduct." Everywhere, one spectator grumbled, "the air is weighty with dangers and misgivings."
Prosecution would be protected yet stunningly untidy—and remarkable. No president in U.S. history had at this point been arraigned.
It at last occurred on February 24, somewhat more than a month after Strong composed the proclamation in his journal. By an edge of 126 to 47, the House casted a ballot to denounce Johnson and the following day informed the U.S. Senate, where the president would be put being investigated as the Constitution required. The Senate would cast a ballot to either clear Johnson or convict him and eliminate him from office.
Andrew Johnson was brought into the world in Raleigh, North Carolina, to a poor mudsill father who kicked the bucket when his child was three years of age. Johnson had no proper instruction; all things considered, his mom apprenticed him to a tailor when he was ten years of age. At age 18 years, he was an ignorant town tailor in his recently received territory of Tennessee. There he met and wedded 16-year-old Eliza McCardle, the girl of a shoemaker, who instructed him to peruse and compose. Johnson turned into an unquenchable peruser who found he had an adoration for and talent for legislative issues. What's more, governmental issues seemed to cherish him. A familiar, amazing speaker, he rose quick. During the 1840s, while still just in his thirties, he turned into a U.S. Delegate from Tennessee. During the 1850s he was lead representative, and by the 1860s he was a U.S. Representative who, in contrast to each other Southern congressperson, stayed faithful to the Union during the conflict.
In 1864, Johnson was named the bad habit official running mate in Lincoln's effective re-appointment crusade. Despite the fact that he was a Union Democrat—a Southern man with Union slants—not a Republican like Lincoln, he was put on the pass to widen its allure. He had liberated his slaves and upheld Lincoln's liberation strategy. At the point when Lincoln passed on April 15, 1865, just three months into his subsequent term, Johnson became president, arriving at the top of U.S. legislative issues. Johnson was a man of genuine disposition, whom one guest saw as "limited and one sided" with "a willful, dubious temper." One of his most clear characteristics was his hardheadedness. An onlooker said he was consistently "certain he was correct, even in his blunders." This quality served him sick in his associations with Congress and carried him to reprimand.
The reprimand was the last blowup among Johnson and Congress over how to deal with Reconstruction of the Union after the Civil War—and who planned to do it. Johnson accepted he planned to do it as he would prefer. Revolutionaries in the Republican Congress considered it to be their work and their work alone.
In question was the destiny of 4,000,000 previous slaves liberated during the conflict or by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Is it accurate to say that they were to be given each benefit of opportunity, as Congress wanted? Or then again left to get by admirably well, unprotected in a wrathful, brutal, bigoted South? Johnson, a racial oppressor, was very little worried about their destiny and was especially against giving individuals of color the option to cast a ballot. Likewise being referred to was the post bellum job of southern pioneers who had taken an interest in severance. Is it safe to say that they were to be seriously rebuffed, as Radicals running Congress wished or set back in the driver's seat, as Johnson needed?
At the point when Johnson became president after Lincoln's death in April 1865, the Radicals were enchanted, accepting he would be more amiable to their program and simpler to manage than Lincoln. During the conflict and before Johnson became president, an ex-Confederate had said of him that he "inhaled fire and hemp against the South, broadcasted he would make conspiracy accursed by hanging backstabbers." This satisfied the Congressional Radicals. However, in the wake of turning out to be president at war's end, Johnson changed his view as his confidence in racial oppression and his bigotry reemerged. He trusted African Americans were a substandard race unsuitable to oversee themselves as well as other people, and he anticipated that the Southern states should be readmitted into the Union and white Southerners to continue their strength over blacks.
What was the name of the Emperor who resisted military government of the Kamakura Shogunate?
Answer:
The Emperors name was Go-Daigo.
HURRY AND ANSWER GIVING BRAINLY
How did the Vietnam War end? Check all that apply.
Answer:
North Vietnam attack Saigon, Communism gained control
Explanation:
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/ending-vietnam
North Vietnam troops invaded and took down the presidential place in Saigon, effectively ending the war. After that, the Communist party took over and currently leads the one-party government.
Answer:
Having rebuilt their forces and upgraded their logistics system, North Vietnamese forces triggered a major offensive in the Central Highlands in March 1975. On April 30, 1975, NVA tanks rolled through the gate of the Presidential Palace in Saigon, effectively ending the war.
Explanation:
list the events that lead to the rise of yellow journalism
Pls helpp and thankssss
Answer:
the Answer .....A
Explanation:
hope its helpful
Which of the following best defines federalism? A. all power is held by the states B. a king governs according to a constitution C. power is shared between the National government and the states Dall powers are held by the central government antitet
PLEASE HELP!! I’ll MAKE BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP!!!!
Category:
Which of category does this poster fit in and why? ARGUMENT OR PERSUASIVE
Audience:
Who is the intended audience of the poster?
Message:
What is the poster’s message?
Images:
How does the artist use symbols, images, shapes, space, and color?
Text:
How does the artist use words?
Facts:
What facts and details do the poster images and text present?
Argument or Persuasion
Do you think is using argumentation or persuasion? Why?
Answer:
no sabo
Explanation:
no sabo
What is a major similarity between the World Trade Organization (WTO) and
the World Bank?
A. Both promote free trade policies among their member states.
B. Both support developing countries at the expense of developed
countries.
C. Both encourage their member states to strengthen their tariffs.
D. Both operate primarily as microfinance institutions.
Answer:b
Explanation:
Answer: Both require members to remove barriers to trade
Explanation: I took the test !
True or false? President Franklin Roosevelt was sworn in after President Kennedy's assassination
Answer: true
Explanation:
What happened in the Suez Canal on Thursday March 25th and how did it affect the rest of the
world?
(On your own words please)
Answer:
On March 25th, the Suez Canal was blocked. This occurred due to a ship, the Ever Given, being stuck inside the canal. Strong winds caused the ship to lose control and steer into the side of the canal. While this may seem like a normal occurrence, what isn't is remaining stuck. While the ship was stuck for 6 days it caused a detrimental amount of damage. Reports state that this one incident could cost the world from 6 to 10 billion dollars worth of trade, just lost. Egypt wants to be compensated, and honestly, it turned into a huge mess.
In what way was the capture of Atlanta an important victory for president Lincoln
Answer: It showed that progress was being made in defeating the South, and it helped persuade Union voters to re-elect Lincoln as President.
What resulted from the closing of the Bank of the United States?
Answer:
When its charter expired in 1836, the Second Bank ended its operations as a national institution. It was reestablished as a commercial bank under the laws of Pennsylvania, where it continued to operate until its failure in 1841.
the events that occurred as a result of the closing of the Second National Bank. After the Second National Bank closed, smaller state and private banks failed, land values decreased, people lost their jobs, and an economic depression began.
n order to be considered a citizen in ancient Greece a man had to _______.
a.
be a member of the noble class
c.
be literate and speak Greek
b.
be able to pay the annual tax
d.
be native-born and own land
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Who were the primary workers at the Lowell system of mills?
Answer:
By 1840, the factories in Lowell employed at some estimates more than 8,000 textile workers, commonly known as mill girls or factory girls.
Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.
Answer:
One short-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims is the mutual defense alliance against their common enemies which only lasted until more Englishmen including both Puritans and non-religious settlers had arrived in New England, tipping the balance of power in favor of the English.
Explanation:
Hope that this helps you out! :)
Have a good rest of your day/night!
The long and short term consequence of the alliance (respectively) between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims includes:
number of natives were killed, taken captive and sold into slavery.its assist white settlers survive by providing them with the resources for food.What is the alliance between Wampanoag & Pilgrims?This alliance involves a peace treaty that states that they will not harm each other, will come to aid if attacked by third parties and have equal jurisdiction over offenders.
However, the long term consequence was that number of natives were killed, taken captive and sold into slavery while short term consequence was that its assist white settlers survive by providing them with the resources for food.
Read more about alliance
brainly.com/question/384845
3) The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a
or a system of law or justice.
the answer would be b on scholar
tell me three contries we discussed who had faciasts dictators after WW1 and going into WW11 (sure to inculde names)
Answer:
Explanation:
===================================================================
ITALY- Benito Mussolini
===================================================================
GERMANY- Adolf Hitler
===================================================================
JAPAN- Hirohito
===================================================================
Can you help me with history?
Answer:
I think that it's A and D
Explanation:
what happens when you add the suffix-ible to digest
Answer:
It appears as "digestible" which means you are able to digest it.
Explanation:
Compared to china did imperialism look same or different in Africa?
Answer:
Economic imperialism in China led to war and political collapse, while formal colonialism in Africa led to oppression of native peoples. ... As they were also behind in military technology and modern warfare, they were defeated and were forced to give concessions to theimperialists
Explanation:
True or False: The Union did little to help the South rebuild during
Reconstruction
Answer:
true. the answer is TRUE
Answer:
false
Explanation:
What best describes a result of the Voting Rights Act?
Presidents Johnson’s approval rating declined among black voters in the North.
The number of registered black voters in the South significantly increased.
Blacks refused to vote in national elections, but voted increasingly in local elections.
Registered black voters in the South switched to the Republican Party.
Answer:
the first one im pretty sure
Explanation:
Answer:
The number of black voters in the South significantly increased.
Explanation:
The effects of the Act were almost immediately felt in the South. From 1966 to 1968 the number of southern states who had at least 50% of African-Americans registered to vote increased from only 9 to all 13.