Odysseus should/should not be prosecuted for the
crime of murder.

Answer:

The answer is number 3.

Explanation:

none

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

Martin Luther King Jr. wrote the Letter from Birmingham Jail to defend the use of nonviolent resistance.

Explanation:

The Letter from Birmingham Jail is an open letter written by Martin Luther King Jr. in 1963. It's considered to be the most important document of the civil rights era. It invites people to fight for justice in a peaceful, nonviolent, manner, calling that their moral responsibility. According to King, people shouldn't wait for justice to come through the courts, but take things into their own hands. Otherwise, they may never defeat injustice.

Answer:

defend the use of nonviolent resistance

Explanation:

Answer:

First person point of view.

Explanation:

Point of view is the perspective from which the story or poem is narrated. It is through this "voice" that the readers are able to learn or "see" or "hear" about the story or poem.

The poem "The Song of the Storm-Spirits" by Cale Young Rice is narrated in the first person point of view. This is evident from the line "Not dance as we", where the speaker uses the first narrative voice/ point of view "we".

Thus, the point of view of this poem is first person point of view.

The resolution of Endgame different from a typical resolution in drama in that the conflict is not resolved. Therefore, option D is correct.

Through the utter despair that consists Endgame, Beckett paradoxically promotes an acceptance of our fate and guides us to value life in all its imperfections.

Characters in Samuel Beckett's Endgame, which is assumed to be antagonistic to story-telling, attempt to create or retell stories despite their obvious failures, difficulties, and objections.

Beckett can be considered a prominent absurdist playwright because his plays reflect these issues, and his play Endgame is a typical absurdist play that depicts the characteristics of this type of drama.

Thus, option D is correct.

To learn more about the endgame, follow the link;

https://brainly.com/question/14939063

#SPJ5

Answer:

52

Explanation:

65% of 80

=0.65 * 80

= 52

Answer:

52!

Explanation:

You can take 65% into a fraction, since it's a percentage. I made it into just 65/100. After you do that, simply multiply that by 80! The answer you end of with is 52.

I hope this helped!!

Answer:

Your answer for this question might be D. I think. Please please get more help using quizzes.com. Take care.

The phrase which best describes someone who is resolute in the story a Christmas Carol is firm and unwavering. Thus the correct option is C.

The central idea of the story Christmas carol is the Struggle Between Happiness and Money. Increasing concern about capitalism's and the industrial era's financial incentives is reflected in the story.

The narrator uses time as a significant incentive for Scrooge's growth and transformation on purpose in the story Christmas carol. Scrooge is physically led through each memory, not just recalling it as he usually does.

The words resolute, unwavering, and unyielding are all synonyms for this one. A "resolute refusal" is a declaration that you don't like something and never will. It demonstrates unwavering loyalty.

Therefore, option C is appropriate.

Learn more about Central idea, here:

https://brainly.com/question/10881113

#SPJ6

Answer:

Kate is allergic to chocolate but she ate a bit.

The news arrived to our homes and we are well informed.

Peter went to the doctor and he wasn’t feeling well.

Anne cried a lot as her dog died.

They received the test and the pupils answered the test right away.

Dau coroana

Hope this helps!

This question is incomplete. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:

Rewrite the sentences in the negative form  

1. Harsh helps in the kitchen.

2. It is raining.

3. Nidhi has a pet dog.

4. Susie and Shyama are working in the garden.

5. We are scared of spiders.

6. I am tired.

7. Ravi and his friends play football every evening.

8. I am in a meeting now.

9. Larry has a blue bicycle.

10. The student is punctual.

Answer:

1. Harsh helps in the kitchen.  - Harsh doesn't help in the kitchen.

2. It is raining.  - It isn't raining.

3. Nidhi has a pet dog.  - Nidhi doesn't have a pet dog.

4. Susie and Shyama are working in the garden.  - Susie and Shyama aren't working in the garden.

5. We are scared of spiders. - We aren't scared of spiders.

6. I am tired.  - I am not tired.

7. Ravi and his friends play football every evening.  - Ravi and his friends don't play football every evening.

8. I am in a meeting now.  - I am not in a meeting right now.

9. Larry has a blue bicycle.  - Larry doesn't have a blue bicycle.

10. The student is punctual. - The student isn't punctual.

Explanation:

The sentences above are either in the Simple Present Tense or in the Present Continuous Tense.

For those in the Simple Present which do not have the verb to be, we need to use the auxiliary verb "do". When the subject is in the third person singular (he, she, it), the auxiliary is conjugated, becoming "does". Since we are writing negative sentences, we can contract the auxiliary with the word "not", forming "don't" and "doesn't". That is what we did in the sentences below:

1. Harsh helps in the kitchen.  - Harsh doesn't help in the kitchen.

3. Nidhi has a pet dog.  - Nidhi doesn't have a pet dog.

7. Ravi and his friends play football every evening.  - Ravi and his friends don't play football every evening.

9. Larry has a blue bicycle.  - Larry doesn't have a blue bicycle.

Now, if the sentence has the verb to be - be it in the Simple Present or in the Present Continuous - we can contract the verb to be with "not". That is what we did in:

2. It is raining.  - It isn't raining.

4. Susie and Shyama are working in the garden.  - Susie and Shyama aren't working in the garden.

5. We are scared of spiders. - We aren't scared of spiders.

6. I am tired.  - I am not tired.

8. I am in a meeting now.  - I am not in a meeting right now.

10. The student is punctual. - The student isn't punctual.

Answer:

At the beginning of the story he preferred to spend his time browsing social media, but at the end of the story he was more than ready for the next adventure.

Explanation:

Answer:

He was mad about leaving at first because he was leaving his home town and best friend. But once he got to his new home he slowly started opening up and going place with some new friends he met. He soon learns that it is not all that bad to see new place and meet new people. When it comes time to move again, his attitude had obviously changed because he said that he is ready for the next adventure.

Explanation:

Heres an intro I used for a essay a few weeks ago :)) lets just hope we go to school together haha  

The process of learning requires many failures, steps, and obstacles, but you can't accomplish any of it without having a positive mindset throughout the process.

Explanation:

Describe failure . Start off with something to grab the reader's attention , eg; we've all failed a test at school or something that the reader can relate to . elaborate on your statement and then shift into an explanation of what failure is . hopefully this makes sense djjddjjd

Answer:

A C and E

Explanation:

i just did the test

Answer:

A C E that is the anwser plzzz give me brinlist

Explanation:

Explanation:

1.The children will criticize his cowardice, who shrinks back at a time when a little might have saved the whole, and made them happy.

2.Say not that thousands are gone ,turn out your tense of thousands

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Answer:

two young men, a mysterious disease, and what happens when they go out to explore after the disease hits

Explanation:

Answer:

Ok i wont :)

Explanation:

Answer:

B This reminds me of our town’s pollution problems.

Explanation:

Answer:the answer is bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb your welcome i got it right on edge 2020 my birthday is on dec 17 im turning 14

Explanation:

Answer:

The function of the dandelion in the poem is to:

C.  provide an opportunity to reflect on the feelings of lost love.

Explanation:

The poem we are analyzing here is "A January Dandelion" by author George Marion McClellan.

The dandelion mentioned in the poem is a symbol of lost love. According to the speaker, this dandelion was fooled by the weather and ended up blooming too soon. In the end, it was blasted by harsh winds and froze "on [its] slender stem." The flower represents what happens to us when we hastily fall in love only to lose it. "[T]here is death and blast," even if we can love again. The heart may still beat, but nothing will change the pain of having been broken:

When once the heart-blooms by love's fervid breath Is left, and chilling snow is sifted in, It still may beat, but there is blast and death

Answer:

A person who attacks someone's beliefs or traditions.

Explanation:

Answer:

A person who attacks someone believe or culture

Answer:yesterday usually not gratefully

Explanation:

Answer:

C. Otto Frank had business connections in Amsterdam, in the Netherlands.

Explanation:

Otto Frank was Anne Frank's father, so obviously he would do everything in his power to protect his family, not put them in harm's way. Not to mention, his connections helped him and his family have contact with the outside world while they were living in the annex.

This question is incomplete. I've found the rest of the question online. Since the excerpt has been posted, I will omit it.

1. What can be concluded about Rainsford from his dialogue?

A. He knows a lot about hunting

B. He feels sympathy for the animal

C. He wishes he had been with the hunter

2. What does Rainsford say that indicates he admires the hunter?

A. "that's odd"

B ."had his nerve"

C. "last shot"

3. What can be concluded about Rainsford from the narration?

A. He thinks he will be safe with the hunter

B. He is afraid of the hunter

C. He is worries that the hunter will send him away

4. What word does the narrator use that helps the reader draw this conclusion?

A. "examined"

B. "found"

C. "eagerly"

Answer:

1. A. He knows a lot about hunting

2. B ."had his nerve"

3. A. He thinks he will be safe with the hunter

4. C. "eagerly"

Explanation:

The excerpt we are studying here was taken from Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game". Rainsford, the main character, is a famous experienced hunter who accidentally falls off a yatch, ending up on General Zaroff's island.

Even if we did not know Rainsford is a hunter, we would be able to tell he knows a lot about hunting after reading the passage. From the signs and tracks he sees and the sounds he hears, he knows what kind of weapon was used, how large the animal was, if there was a struggle on the animal's part and so on. That is why number 1 should be answered with A. He knows a lot about hunting.

Also, when Rainsford says "[t]he hunter had his nerve with him," he is complimenting the unknown hunter's courage to follow the animal. That is why number 2 should be answered with B ."had his nerve".

Numbers 3 and 4 are based on the same line: "Eagerly he hurried along." Why is Rainsford eager to meet the hunter? Because he will feel safer. So far, he does not know that Zaroff is hunting other men; Rainsford still thinks there are large animals on the loose on the island. He would rather find the hunter than the animals. So, numbers 3 and 4 should be answered with A. He thinks he will be safe with the hunter  and C. "eagerly", respectively.

Answer:

1. A. He knows a lot about hunting

2. B ."had his nerve"

3. A. He thinks he will be safe with the hunter

4. C. "eagerly"

Explanation:

Answer:

In a dispute, it's often easier to describe how others respond than to evaluate how we respond. Each of us has a predominant conflict style. With a better understanding of the impact our personal conflict style has on other people, we can consciously choose how to respond to others in a conflict situation.

Competing

Value of own issue/goal: High

Value of relationship: Low

Result: I win, you lose

Competitors come across as aggressive, autocratic, confrontational and intimidating. A competitive style is an attempt to gain power and pressure a change. A competitive style can be appropriate when you have to implement an unpopular decision, make a quick decision, the decision is vital in a crisis or it is important to let others know how important an issue is to you – "standing up for your right." However, relationships can be harmed beyond repair or others may feel they have to use covert methods to get their needs met.

Accommodating

Value of own issue/goal: Low

Value relationship: High

Result: I lose, you win

Accommodators set aside their own needs because they want to please others in order to keep the peace. Smoothing or harmonizing can result in a false solution to a problem and can result in feelings ranging from anger to pleasure. Accommodators are unassertive and cooperative and may play the role of a martyr, complainer or saboteur. Accommodation is useful when admitting you are wrong or when you want to minimize losses to preserve relationships. However, it can become competitive – "I am nicer than you are" – and may result in reduced creativity and increased power imbalances.

Avoiding

Value of own issue/goal: Low

Value of relationship: Low

Result: I lose, you lose

Avoiders deliberately ignore or withdraw from a conflict rather than face it. Avoiders do not seem to care about their issue or the issues of others. People who avoid the situation hope the problem will go away, resolve itself without their involvement or rely on others to take the responsibility. Avoidance can be appropriate when you need more time to think and process, time constraints demand a delay, or the risk of confrontation is not worth what might be gained. However, avoidance is destructive if the other person perceives that you don’t care enough to engage. By not dealing with the conflict, this style allows the conflict to simmer, potentially resulting in angry or negative outbursts.

Compromising

Value of own issue/goal: Medium

Value of relationship: Medium

Result: I win some, you win some

Compromisers are willing to sacrifice some of their goals and persuade others to give up theirs, too–give a little, get a little. Compromise maintains the relationship and can take less time than other methods but resolutions may focus on demands rather than needs or goals. The compromise is not necessarily intended to make all parties happy or result in a decision that makes the most business sense, but rather ensures the decision is just and equitable, even if it causes a loss for both parties. Power is defined by what one party can coerce or get the other to give up. To split the difference, game-playing can result in an outcome that is less creative and ideal.

Collaborating

Value of own issue/goal: High

Value of relationship: High

Result: I win, you win

Collaboration generates creative solutions that satisfy all the parties’ concerns and needs. Collaborators identify the underlying concerns, test assumptions and understand the views of others. Collaboration fosters respect, trust and builds relationships. Collaborators address the conflict directly and in a way that expresses willingness for all parties to get what they need. However, collaboration takes time so if the relationship is not important it may not be worth the time and energy to create a win-win solution.

In any conflict ask, "Is my preferred conflict handling style the very best I can use to resolve this conflict or solve this problem?"

Explanation:

The line that is an example of direct characterization is A most extraordinary man, a Mr. Nuttel,” said Mrs. Sappleton; “could only talk about his illnesses, and dashed off without a word of good-bye or apology when you arrived

Direct characterization is the way an author or write use to describe or tell more about the characters involved in a direct or straight forward form without any form of bias.

Therefore, The line that is an example of direct characterization is A most extraordinary man, a Mr. Nuttel,” said Mrs. Sappleton; “could only talk about his illnesses, and dashed off without a word of good-bye or apology when you arrived

Learn more about direct characterization below.

https://brainly.com/question/1956203

#SPJ1

Answer:

Tolerance in the workplace is crucial for everything to function properly.

Explanation:

The first thing is to be clear that we are all different and that there will be ways of acting with which we can agree and others with which we cannot. Tolerance does not mean agreeing with everyone or everything, in work teams, it does not even mean reluctantly accepting what does not seem right to us.

Tolerance as part of teamwork implies respecting and trying to reach agreements being as objective as possible in terms of team objectives.  

And it is that human beings are naturally diverse, but this does not mean that we are incapable of listening and communicating, with the clear objective of entering into agreements without ceasing to be who we are. It is a reality that in any company different people converge, owners of traits and qualities that distinguish them, but that within the organization they need to establish harmonious links to form successful work teams.

But, on the contrary,when being tolerant, the other is listened to, they are respected, it does not mean fully sharing their way of seeing, thinking or acting, not even that we have to like the person or that we have to spend time with them, but simply that we allow it to be, see, think, feel or act in its own way.  

Although this can be very enriching for a company, it also implies the coexistence between different points of view; The fact that these differences exist is not the negative, what clouds the work environment is the fact of thinking that only one point of view is valid or that that of another member of the work team contributes less than the rest.

A tolerant work environment can lead to more fluid, honest, and open communication. This implies greater cooperation, loyalty, and of course greater productivity.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

because he is smart