Answer:
Persons who choose to carry their cultural traditions into life in another country are most likely nationalists
Explanation:
The nationalists are people that have strong feelings towards their nation, the life style, the culture, the food, pretty much everything that is part of it and makes it unique. People that are nationalists tend to keep their cultural traditions wherever they go. They can move in another country that is on the other side of the ocean where the culture is totally different, but they will stay strong to their cultural heritage, respect it, and if possible spread it out.
Answer:c) nationalists
Explanation:hope this helps :)
Who know the answer pls
Answer:
i think its A
Explanation:
1. Which best summarizes the effectiveness of the Freedmen’s Bureau?
A.It successfully redistributed land to all former slaves, but it did not teach them how to farm the land.
B. It built schools and hospitals for former slaves, but a lack of funding prevented it from doing more.
C. It gave cholera vaccines to former slaves, but it failed to provide basic medical needs beyond that.
D. It distributed clothing to former slaves, but it left them illiterate and without an education.
2. Why did Congress impeach President Andrew Johnson in 1868?
A. Congress and Johnson disagreed on the powers of the Supreme Court.
B. Congress and Johnson disagreed about Reconstruction legislation.
C. Congress and Johnson disagreed over America's purchase of Alaska.
D. Congress and Johnson disagreed on whether slavery should be legal.
3. Why did many white Southerners oppose the Fourteenth Amendment?
A. The amendment placed the blame for starting the Civil War on the South.
B. The amendment granted equal rights as citizens to African Americans.
C. The amendment forced Southern states to extend voting rights to women.
D. The amendment abolished the practice of slavery in the South forever.
4. Why did Congress divide the South into military districts?
A. Republicans in Congress wanted to redraw state borders to prevent future attempts at secession.
B. Republicans in Congress did not trust white southerners to adopt reforms giving rights to freed slaves.
C. Both parties in Congress wanted a reason to increase the federal military budget.
D. Both parties in Congress believed districts would make it easier to return escaped slaves to their owners.
5. Which statement is true about African Americans in government during early Reconstruction?
A. Many African Americans in the South were elected to Congress and state legislatures.
B. African Americans were not allowed to vote in the former Confederate states.
C. Congress banned African Americans from serving in state legislatures.
D. An African American became governor in every one of the former Confederate states.
Answer:
B for the first question
A for the 2nd question
C for the 3rd question
A for the 4th question
B for the 5th question
Explanation:
i think
The Holocaust resulted in the murder of more than six million people, most of whom were
A. criminals
B. American
C. Jewish
D. Russian
Answer:
c
Explanation: i took the test
The United States and The soviet Union
Answer:
The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. ... The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race.
Explanation:
YOO I NEED HELPP!!
In the past several years, cellular phones have become more widely available in rural Africa. What prediction can best be made from this fact?
A. Technological production will begin to shift to Africa.
B. Africa will become more interconnected.
C. African nations’ debt will increase.
D. Cellular phones will become an outdated technology.
Answer:
the answer is B
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
What describes the social structure of the south in the antebellum era
Answer:
The Antebellum Era is defined as after the War of 1812 and before the Civil war (1861)
Explanation:
1. Southern Plantation owners formed the "Elites"- Upper South (old money) & Deep South (new money)
2. Yeaman Farmers or small landowners
3. Poor Whites- who has no land and would also work on plantations as slave "managers"
4. Slaves
Male dominated social structures. Poor whites didn't mind being below the Elites because they all believed in white supremacy, having slaves present would defuse class tension because there was always a lower status.
In the nineteenth century, the popular European view of sub-Saharan Africa was that the area had been uncivilized and was only beginning to become a civilized continent after Europeans had "discovered" the region and brought civilization to these "backward" people. Do you agree with this popular nineteenth century view? Write a minimum 500-word essay in which you defend your position.
Answer:
I do not agree.
Explanation:
The arrival of the British in sub-Saharan Africa is part of European Colonialism, widespread in various parts of the world, with the aim of exploring and dominating a region and all the resources available in it.
It is common to hear that colonization was a blessing for the life of the colonies because it took culture, religion and modenity to a region considered "wild" and "inadequate". However, we can say that colonization was not a blessing anywhere, since in these regions the adoption of European culture and religion was imposed in very violent and authoritarian ways.
All colonies, including sub-Saharan Africa, already had a population established and organized according to their customs and religion. This population was different from what Europeans considered "civilized", but we cannot deny, that the natives had their own type of civilization that functioned efficiently between their citizens and their territory.
However, Europeans considered themselves the owners of the truth, and the only ones endowed with knowledge and education. They totally ignored native civilizations and their cultures, considering them wild and impure, which needed European society to put them in what was right. They used this concept to justify all the violent exploitation and acculturation that the natives went through, because they believed that God had given them the mission to "fix" the peoples and end the civilization that was established in the place, without any consideration.
What long term consequences did the Colombian exchange have on native peoples in the Americas
A. It forced native kingdoms to form joint stock companies that weakened their economies
B. It helped native empires to expand their territories using gunpowder weapons
C. It resulted in disease outbreaks that devastated native populations
D. It brought farming techniques to the americas for the first time
Answer:
C. It resulted in disease outbreaks that devastated native populations
Explanation:
The Europeans brought many diseases like small pox and measles that eradicated many native populations.
Hernando Cortez was able to Aztecs because they were devastated by the small pox disease, so he was able to attack the weakened natives and take over.
Discuss how that person exemplified at least three characteristics of great leadership or heroism.
Answer:
Have you ever heard the phrase, "Great leaders are born, not made"? This quote sums up the basic tenant of the great man theory of leadership, which suggests that the capacity for leadership is inborn. According to this theory, you're either a natural born leader or you're not.
The term "Great Man" was used because, at the time, leadership was thought of primarily as a male quality, especially in terms of military leadership.
History
The great man theory of leadership became popular during the 19th-century. The mythology behind some of the world's most famous leaders such as Abraham Lincoln, Julius Caesar, Mahatma Gandhi and Alexander the Great helped contribute to the notion that great leaders are born and not made. In many examples, it seems as if the right man for the job seems to emerge almost magically to take control of a situation and lead a group of people into safety or success.
Historian Thomas Carlyle also had a major influence on this theory of leadership, at one point stating that, "The history of the world is but the biography of great men." According to Carlyle, effective leaders are those gifted with divine inspiration and the right characteristics.1
Some of the earliest research on leadership looked at people who were already successful leaders. These individuals often included aristocratic rulers who achieved their position through birthright. Because people of a lesser social status had fewer opportunities to practice and achieve leadership roles, it contributed to the idea that leadership is an inherent ability.1
Even today, people often describe prominent leaders as having the right qualities or personality for the position, implying that inherent characteristics are what make these people effective leaders.
Arguments Against the Great Man Theory of Leadership
Sociologist Herbert Spencer suggested that the leaders were products of the society in which they lived. In The Study of Sociology, Spencer wrote, "you must admit that the genesis of a great man depends on the long series of complex influences which has produced the race in which he appears, and the social state into which that race has slowly grown...Before he can remake his society, his society must make him."
One of the key problems with the great man theory of leadership is that not all people who possess the so-called natural leadership qualities actually become great leaders. If leadership was simply an inborn quality, then all people who possess the necessary traits would eventually find themselves in leadership roles. Research has instead found that leadership is a surprisingly complex subject and that numerous factors influence how successful a particular leader may or may not be. Characteristics of the group, the leader in power and the situation all interact to determine what type of leadership is needed and the effectiveness of this leadership.
Explanation:
What does an enduring issue mean?
Explanation:
An enduring issue is a challenge or problem that has been debated or discussed across time. An enduring issue is one that many societies have attempted to address with varying degrees of success. Task: • Identify and define an enduring issue raised by this set of documents.
What role did the Muslim league play in the movement for independence in India
Answer:
The League played an important role during the 1940s in the Indian independence movement. It was a driving force behind the creation of Pakistan as a Muslim state on the Indian subcontinent. After the independence of India and Pakistan, the Muslim League was split.
If equal and opposite charges Q were placed on the Earth and the Moon, what should be the value of Q to maintain the present orbit? Use these data: mass of Earth = 5.98×1024kgmass of Moon = 7.35×1022kgradius of orbit = 3.84×108m.
Answer:
5.71 x 10^13 C.
Explanation:
We are given the following parameters or data or information and these data are going to help us in solving this particular Question or problem effectively and efficiently;
=> mass of Earth = 5.98 × 10^ 24kg, mass of Moon = 7.35 × 10^22 kg and the radius of orbit = 3.84 × 10^8m.
Recall that H =( G × m1 × m2) / r^2. where m1 and m2 are the masses of the two bodies amd r is the radius.
We will be making use of the formula below:
the value of Q to maintain the present orbit = √ { ( 7.35 × 10^22 ) × (5.98 × 10^24) × 4 × π × V.
the value of Q to maintain the present orbit = 5.71 x 10^13 C.
What did president johnson announce to the American people during his televised address on March 31, 1968 select all that apply
Answer:
President Johnson announces at the end of a speech that he will not run for reelection nor accept the nomination of the Democratic Party if offered.
I hoped this helped what were the options?
B.)
C.)
D.)
F.)
Explanation:
Got it right. :)
Locke’s belief in a person
Key privileges included in both the English Bill of Rights and the US Bill of Rights include
protection against unusual punishment and the right to trial by jury.
the rights to bear arms and to enact legislation after debate.
the rights to equal taxation and to trial by jury.
protection against unusual punishment and the right to suspend laws.
The correct answer is A. Protection against unusual punishment and the right to trial by jury.
Explanation:
Both the US Bill of Rights and the English Bills of Rights guaranteed basic rights. The English Bill of Rights was approved in 1689, limited the power of monarchs, and provided citizens some protection; this included the right against unusual punishment, the right to be judged according to law, and the right to be represented.
On the other hand, the US Bill of Rights approved in 1789 defined government, and guaranteed rights to the citizens. This also included protection against unusual or cruel punishment and the right of a fair trial. Also, this document included other rights such as the right to bear arms and the protection against unfair seizures. Thus, the common rights in both documents are "Protection against unusual punishment and the right to trial by jury".
Answer:
a
Explanation:
What is a "red state"?
A. A state where there are more than two presidential candidates
B. A state where there is a Democratic majority
C. A state where there is no clear majority
D. A state where there is a Republican majority
SUBITO
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Blue represents the Democrats red represents the Republicans gray represents independent
Before the French Revolution, which group paid taxes to the government?
Answer:
The third estate
Who was Mary Elizabeth Lease?
Answer:
Mary Elizabeth Lease was an american lecturer,writer, and was a political activist in 1888
in Athens women were excluded from participating in government??
The journey across the atlantic ocean to transport Africa slaves to the Americas was called. The
Answer:
Transatlantic Slave Trade, could also be known as the Middle Passage
Explanation:
ques
on 17 of 20
2 Points
Why was the American victory at the Battle of Saratoga significant?
O A. Britain decided to surrender and end the war.
OB. Spain decided to become a British ally.
O C. France decided to help the Americans.
O D. Canada decided to join the American rebels.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
How do historical narratives help readers better understand information about the past?
A. They make historical information more appealing and help hold readers attention.
B. They convert information from written histories into oral histories.
C. They present a variety of conclusions about history drawn from contradictory sources.
D. They make historical information more accurate by including a lot of dates and proper names.
The correct answer is A. They make historical information more appealing and help hold readers attention.
Explanation:
Historical narratives use information about past events, people, societies, etc. to create narrative texts or stories that have narrative features such as the use of descriptions, dialogues, characters, complex plots, suspense, among others. These features make historical information to be more appealing to the readers because it is easier to understand events of the past if these are presented through a narrator or through specific important characters. Also, this type of narrative catches the attention of most readers who consider it is more interesting learning history through stories than by reading an encyclopedia or similar source.
1. Mohandas Gandhi led India to independence from Britain and is one of the world’s great historical figures. Describe his development during the three major stages of his life in three different countries.
2. According to Gandhi, “nonviolence [is] a weapon.” Who could use this weapon? What did Gandhi believe nonviolence could achieve.
3. Imagine you were born in 1830. Throughout your life, you witness one momentous change after another. By the first decade of the twentieth century, the world around you has been transformed thoroughly. Now comes an important event in your life. It may not make it into the history books or the newspapers, but it’s all your family members can talk about…the birth of your first great granddaughter in 1914! You’ve lived through a lot of changes, and you begin to wonder about how the world might be transformed during her lifetime. After all, your granddaughter might well live until the year 2000! You sit down to write a letter to your newborn granddaughter—something she can read in the years and decades ahead. Reflecting on the types of changes that have taken place in your lifetime, you decide to write about what you think will happen in the century ahead. Your letter will address possible changes in the four categories you looked at in the previous activity: political/military, cultural, science/technology, and social/economic. In addition, you’ll want to write about these key points:
(a) Ways in which life might improve in the future.
(b) Good things from the previous century that might be lost as times change.
(c) How your granddaughter should view change, what she should resist and what she should embrace.
Type your answer here.
Answer:
1. Countries in his lifetime are India, England, and South Africa.
2. Everyone; archive peace
3. See explanation below
what did james madison argue in federalist 10?
The correct answer is C. That a national government would guard against factions and special interests better than state government would
Explanation:
The Federalist 10 was an essay published in 1787 by James Madison, who was a recognized Founding Father. In this essay, Madison focuses on the concept of "faction" that refers to groups that naturally form due to interest, and that might harm politics. About this, Madison states factions cannot be avoided but they can be guarded and the general interests can be preserved through the national government.
Indeed, for Madison, the best way to counteract against factions and particular interest is the national government, which is more efficient at this than state governments, which are likely to focus on the communities' interests. Thus, in this document, Madison argues "that a national government would guard against factions and special interests better than state government would."
Which lines from this stanza suggest that many
Europeans believed that the native cultures of their
colonies were inferior?
Take up the White Marls burder-
Send for the best ye breed
O'Go bind your sons to ente
To serve your captives need
O To wait in heary hemess,
Onfuttered fokk and wilo
O Your new caught, sulien peoples,
Halt der and half child
Answer:
D). "Your new-caught, sullen peoples, half-devil and half-child."
Explanation:
Kipling's poem 'The White Men's Burden' is often considered as a general acclamation of imperialism.
As per the question, the lines 'your new-caught...half-child' advocate the idea that a number of Europeans possessed an internal belief that their native colonies' cultures were inferior. The key idea behind the use of words like 'half-devil' or 'half-child' is to reinforce the racial attitudes of imperialism. The poet believed that they were 'uncivilized' and 'ignorant' and therefore, inferior. Thereby, he recognized imperialism equivalent to humanitarianism as the imperialists civilize and educate them. Hence, option D is the correct answer.
The Kingdom of Mali was replaced by the Kingdom of Ghana.
Answer:
The kingdom of Mali was not replaced by the kingdom of Ghana. So it is FALSE
Explanation:
The Kingdom of Ghana was born in 750 and finished in 1068, taking the zone of Mauritania and Mali, while the Kingdom of Mali was born in 1235, 167 years after the fallen of Ghana, and finished in 1546, had under its power the current countries of Mali and Guinea, by this reason Ghana couldn't replace the Mali kingdom, because the first one mention rising many years before the second.
Answer:
The answer is false
Explanation:
Your welcome.
What is a name for cars
Answer:
vehicles, automobiles, heavy machinery
Explanation:
NEED ANSWER NOW!!!!
Which is a long term effect of Reconstruction?
African Americans faced no difficulties voting in local or national elections.
The economy in the South returned to what it was before the Civil War.
Its laws laid the groundwork for future civil rights lawsuits and legislation.
The federal government used military occupation to protect the rights of all citizens.
Answer:After the American Civil War, the South was in ruins and there was doubt about how the Southern states would treat newly freed slaves. So the US government instituted a 15-year policy known as Reconstruction, in which the military was stationed in the South in order to maintain law and order now that the Confederate government was gone, help rebuild the infrastructure after the devastation of the war, and ensure the equal treatment of whites and blacks, for instance concerning the ability to vote. Reconstruction is widely viewed as a failure; the South suffered from a lot of exploitative Northern entrepreneurs known as "carpetbaggers", and in the end the South reverted to unequal treatment of blacks through Jim Crow laws.
Explanation:
Answer:It took years for many farms to recover after the destruction of the war.
Explanation:
Why were President Wilson’s Fourteen Points not incorporated in the Treaty of Versailles?
President Wilson's Fourteen Points were not incorporated in the Treaty of Versailles because the Allied delegates wanted Germany to pay reparations for the war. Georges Clemenceau, the French prime minister, was especially concerned with giving Germany big reparations for the damage caused in France during World War I. Wilson's points were seen as peaceful and since he became physically ill during the Treaty of Versailles, Clemenceau was able to push his ideas and disregard the Fourteen Points.
Answer: The Fourteen Points was a statement of principles for peace that was to be used for peace negotiations in order to end World War I. The principles were outlined in a January 8, 1918, speech on war aims and peace terms to the United States Congress by President Woodrow Wilson.
Explanation: ive done an essay on this before hope this helped
Is being an imperial power good for America
Answer:
Indeed, being a global imperialist power is a positive factor for the United States of America. This situation, by means of which America exercises political and economic power over the rest of the countries of the world, implies for the United States an advantageous situation because it can determine through said power the directions of world politics according to its convenience, favoring the interests of the government and citizens over those of the other countries of the world.