Please help ASAP!!!​

Answer:  The king was determined to be subject to the law.

Explanation:

The English king was forced to sign the Great Charter of Liberties. He did it under circumstances that did not suit him. In such circumstances, the king had limited arbitrariness. The great charter limited freedom and the power of the king. The king put his seal on the charter but never signed it because it did not suit him. In such circumstances, the English Civil War broke out.

Answer:

Nellie Cashman

Explanation:

Answer:

Evolution is a gradual change in the inherited traits of a population over many generations. Natural selection is a mechanism where the members of a population best suited to their environment have the best chance of surviving to pass on their genes.

Explanation:

sorry if i copied but i didn't

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Answer:

you need help with what?

Explanation:

Answer:

Mansa Musa’s Hajj had a significant impact on the development of Islam in Mali and on the perception of Mali throughout Africa and Europe. He was later accompanied back to Mali by an Andalusian architect, who is said to have designed the mosque at Timbuktu.

Explanation:

Answer: the answer is 71%

Answer: that punani si mntio sencia retiad sieda

Explanation:

Answer:

C. W.E.B. DuBois

Explanation:

DuBois felt that renouncing the goal of complete integration and social equality, even in the short run, was counterproductive and exactly the opposite strategy from what best suited African Americans. His group was denounced as radical by most whites at the time. Educated African Americans, however, supported the resolutions.

Answer:

parliament interfered in colonial affairs by taxing the colonies directly in passing the stamp act without consulting the colonial legislatures and it taxed the colonists without their consent .

Explanation:

Answer:

Engineer Gustave Eiffel

Answer: Government signed a treaty of alliance with France in 1778. Government successfully waged a war for independence against the British. Government negotiated an end to the American Revolution in the Treaty of Paris, signed in 1783.

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is B.

The Mexican government had no real political need to take the Alamo, but Santa Anna wanted to get revenge for the defeat of General Cós and teach the Texas rebels a lesson.

hope this helps

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

 Emperor Qianlong

Explanation:

I'm not really  sure if this is right because I don't know what the text says, but I read about it a little.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I took the quiz

Answer:

Look downnn Ur welcome :)

Explanation:

Answer:

The 1920s was a decade of profound social changes. The most obvious signs of change were the rise of a consumer-oriented economy and of mass entertainment, which helped to bring about a "revolution in morals and manners." Sexual mores, gender roles, hair styles, and dress all changed profoundly during the 1920s.

Explanation:

The 1920s was a decade of change, when many Americans owned cars, radios, and telephones for the first time. The cars brought the need for good roads. The radio brought the world closer to home

Answer:

Explanation:

1532

November 16

Francisco Pizarro traps Incan emperor Atahualpa

On November 16, 1532, Francisco Pizarro, the Spanish explorer and conquistador, springs a trap on the Incan emperor, Atahualpa. With fewer than 200 men against several thousand, Pizarro lures Atahualpa to a feast in the emperor’s honor and then opens fire on the unarmed Incans. Pizarro’s men massacre the Incans and capture Atahualpa, forcing him to convert to Christianity before eventually killing him.

Pizarro’s timing for conquest was perfect. By 1532, the Inca Empire was embroiled in a civil war that had decimated the population and divided the people’s loyalties. Atahualpa, the younger son of former Incan ruler Huayna Capac, had just deposed his half-brother Huascar and was in the midst of reuniting his kingdom when Pizarro arrived in 1531, with the endorsement of Spain’s King Charles V. On his way to the Incan capital, Pizarro learned of the war and began recruiting soldiers still loyal to Huascar.

Pizarro met Atahualpa just outside Cajamarca, a small Incan town tucked into a valley of the Andes. Sending his brother Hernan as an envoy, Pizarro invited Atahualpa back to Cajamarca for a feast in honor of Atahualpa’s ascendance to the throne. Though he had nearly 80,000 soldiers with him in the mountains, Atahualpa consented to attend the feast with only 5,000 unarmed men. He was met by Vicente de Valverde, a friar traveling with Pizarro. While Pizarro’s men lay in wait, Valverde urged Atahualpa to convert and accept Charles V as sovereign. Atahualpa angrily refused, prompting Valverde to give the signal for Pizarro to open fire. Trapped in tight quarters, the panicking Incan soldiers made easy prey for the Spanish. Pizarro’s men slaughtered the 5,000 Incans in just an hour. Pizarro himself suffered the only Spanish injury: a cut on his hand sustained as he saved Atahualpa from death.

Realizing Atahualpa was initially more valuable alive than dead, Pizarro kept the emperor in captivity while he made plans to take over his empire.In response, Atahualpa appealed to his captors’ greed, offering them a room full of gold and silver in exchange for his liberation. Pizarro consented, but after receiving the ransom, Pizarro brought Atahualpa up on charges of stirring up rebellion. By that time, Atahualpa had played his part in pacifying the Incans while Pizarro secured his power, and Pizarro considered him disposable. Atahualpa was to be burned at the stake—the Spanish believed this to be a fitting death for a heathen—but at the last moment, Valverde offered the emperor clemency if he would convert. Atahualpa submitted, only to be executed by strangulation. The day was August 29, 1533.

Fighting between the Spanish and the Incas would continue well after Atahualpa’s death as Spain consolidated its conquests. Pizarro’s bold victory at Cajamarca, however, effectively marked the end of the Inca Empire and the beginning of the European colonization of South America

Answer:

it means to invalidate or cancel/get rid of the federal law

Explanation:

Answer: Our estimates suggest that immigration, measured as the average share of migrants in the population between 1860 and 1920, generated significant economic benefits for today's population, including significantly higher incomes, less poverty, less unemployment, more urbanization, and higher educational attainment

Explanation: In situations where immigrants greatly outnumber the original inhabitants, nativist movements seek to prevent cultural change. Employment: Immigrants acquire jobs that would have otherwise been available to native citizens, limiting native employment; they also create a surplus of labor that lowers wages.

Because there is insufficient evidence to support women's suffrage, America needs greater voting quality rather than more votes.

Anti-suffragists said that the majority of women did not want the right to vote. They claimed that because women had to take care of the home and the children, they did not have time to vote or follow politics.. Some claimed that women lacked the knowledge or the capacity to think critically about political matters.

Anti-suffragism was, to some extent, a Classical Conservative movement that rejected the idea of granting women equal suffrage rights and aimed to maintain the status quo for women. The idea that women should have total freedom in the home was known as "domestic feminism," and it was strongly related to that idea.

To know more about anti-women's suffrage visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/9302314

#SPJ1

Answer:

B- Coronado traveled around the Southwest and down through Mexico.

Explanation:

The letter that indicates the route taken by the Spanish explorer Francisco Vasquez de Coronado on the map which shows Northern America and different routes of exploration is letter B

Answer:

It claimed that kings were answerable only to God, and only God could punish the king. - King James I of England (James VI of Scotland) embraced the concept and he agreed with Bodin that the divine right of absolute monarchy was the only way to preserve law and order.

BRAINLIEST PLEASE

Answer:

true

Explanation:

true

yeah I checked it it's true

A later Muslim invasion in 1398 devastated the city of Delhi. The Mughal Empire grew out of descendants of the Mongol Empire who were living in Turkestan in the 15th century. They had become Muslims and assimilated the culture of the Middle East, while keeping elements of their Far Eastern roots.

Answer:

Explain:

I don’t think any self respecting monarch would’ve accepted the ultimatum. The demands were made to be rejected. This war was waiting to happen. If it had not happened in 1914, it might have started in 1915 or 1916. Earlier the respective powers avoided the 1909 Bosnian crisis but the conflict kept coming back again.

If the Serbian King had accepted the Austrian demands, he might have faced violent repression at home. The next ruler might have done something against Austro-Hungarian empire and that crisis might have started the war.

Answer:

Rome was able to gain its empire in large part by extending some form of citizenship to many of the people it conquered. Military expansion drove economic development, bringing enslaved people and loot back to Rome, which in turn transformed the city of Rome and Roman culture.

Explanation:

Reasons of falling of Rome empire.

Invasions by Barbarian tribes. ...

Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor.

The rise of the Eastern Empire.

Overexpansion and military overspending.

Government corruption and political instability.

Answer:

Yes legalism is still around.  It is seen today in China in many different aspects.  An example of how it is still seen today is that when my parents were living in China they witnessed executions and other harsh punishments being placed on individuals.  Legalism today is not the same as it once was as it has changed over the years.

Legalism is seen, to a lesser extent to what it once was, however in China the philosophy  of legalism still exists in their governmental structure, political system and judicial systems.  The government still inflicts judgement and punishment as it was in previous years however they do not hold as harsh of consequences as they once did.

For us living in the western world it is easy for us to look in and identify legalism within Chinese systems however for people living in China it is harder for them to see it at the same extent because this is what they have grown to know and they do not know other ways.  Most Chinese citizens have limited access to outside information to compare their systems to other countries.

In China, you can still see the effects of legalism by the way we see how they respond to crimes.  For example some of the punishment is stricter than we see in North America.   Also, you can see the effects of legalism in China by the way the people respond to the government.  Generally citizens in China fear the government because of the consequences that would be initiated if they disobey.  For example when the students stood up against the government in Tianamen Square in 1989, the students were seen as rebels and attacked by the military, killed, thrown in prison and several had to flee the country.

Legalism is still prevalent today as seen through these examples that we have shared although it is not to the same extent as it was when it was first created in the warring states period.

Explanation:

Answer:

Globalization

Explanation: It is the expanse of goods, services and ideas from around the world

Answer:

The Missouri Compromise created a temporary bandage to keep the Union together. The issue of slavery first became a major issue during these disputes. Slavery will continue to be an issue in the Union for years to come. During this time, the sectionalism between the North and South was increasing, and the issue of expansion of slavery is tearing apart the country. The expansion of slavery angered the North, and the abolitionists were more radical. The South viewed slavery as not morally wrong, they would do whatever it took to continue slavery, even if it meant seccession.

Explanation:

Answer:

Because The British Army successfully moved against the American Continental Army led by George Washington. The battlewas part of aBritish campaign to seize control of New York and thereby isolate New England from the rest of the colonies.