Please hurry
On each bounce, a ball dropped from 100 feet rises to the height
from which it has fallen. How high does the ball rise, in feet, on the 10th bounce?

Answer: $264.54

Hope this helped! God bless!

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

First multiply 9 by 2.5

Then divide 225 by 22.5

Answer:

-15

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution of expression for x = - 4 is,

⇒ - 15

We have to given that,

An expression is,

⇒ 2x - 7

Now, We can simplify the expression for x = - 4 as,

An expression is,

⇒ 2x - 7

Plug x = - 4;

⇒ 2 × - 4 - 7

⇒ - 8 - 7

⇒ - 15

Thus, The solution of expression for x = - 4 is,

⇒ - 15

Learn more about the equation visit:

brainly.com/question/28871326

#SPJ6

Answer:

D.) Converges; 256

Step-by-step explanation:

x0= 192

x1 = 48 = 192/4

x2 = 12 = 192/(4 x 4)

Therefore, this series can be written as:

[tex]x_n = \frac{192}{4^n}[/tex]

Applying limits at infinity:

[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n= \lim_{n \to \infty} (\frac{192}{4^n}) = \frac{192}{\infty}=0[/tex]

Since the terms of the series tend to zero, we can affirm that the series converges.

The sum of an infinite converging series is:

[tex]S=\frac{x_0}{1-r} \\S=\frac{192}{1-\frac{1}{4} }\\S=256[/tex]

Thus, the answer is D.) Converges; 256

Answer:

63

Step-by-step explanation:

Make a ratio:

5 : 7 = 45 : x

x = 63

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Given the variables

X: daily hotel room rate

Y: amount spent on the entertainment

See second attachment for scatter plot.

The population regression equation is E(Yi)= α + βXi

To estimate the y-intercept and the slope of the regression equation you have to apply the following formulas:

[tex]b= \frac{sum XY-\frac{(sumX)(sumY)}{n} }{sumX^2-\frac{(sumX)^2}{n} }[/tex]

a= Y[bar]-bX[bar]

n= 9; ∑X= 945; ∑X²= 103325; ∑Y= 1134 ∑Y²= 148804; ∑XY= 123307

X[bar]= ∑X/n= 945/9= 105

Y[bar]= ∑Y/n= 1134/9= 126

[tex]b= \frac{123307-\frac{945*1134}{9} }{103325-\frac{(945)^2}{9} }= 1.03[/tex]

a= 126 - 1.03*105= 17.49

^Y= 17.49 + 1.03Xi

Slope interpretation: The estimated average amount spent on entertainment increases 1.03 every time the daily hotel room rate increases one unit.

If the room rate for Chicago is $128 (X), to predict the mount spent in entertainment (Y) you have replace it in the estimated regression line:

^Y= 17.49 + 1.03Xi= 17.49 + 1.03*128= 149.33

The expected amount spent on entertainment for Chicago is $149.33

I hope this helps!

Answer:

24.99

Step-by-step explanation:

If the area of the quarter circle is 38.465, then the equation to find this would be

3.14*r^2 / 4 = 38.465. we solve for r, the radius, and get two solutions. 7 and -7. Obviously the length of the radius can't be -7, so we know the radius is 7.

Now we must solve for the perimeter. The perimeter is equal to 2r + (2*3.14*r)/4

Plugging 7 in as the radius, r, we get 24.99 as our final answer.

First number = [tex]x[/tex]

Second number = [tex]x-11[/tex]

[tex]x+x-11+8=71[/tex]

[tex]2x-3=71[/tex]

[tex]2x=71+3[/tex]

[tex]2x=74[/tex]

[tex]x=37[/tex]

First number = [tex]x=37[/tex]

Second number =  [tex]x-11=37-11=26[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]y-4p[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Add/subtract like terms.

[tex]5y+2p-4y-6p\\5y-4y+2p-6p\\y-4p[/tex]

Answer:

Number line A.

Step-by-step explanation:

|-5x| - 11 = -1

Add 11 to both sides.

|-5x| = 10

-5x = 10 or -5x = -10

x = -2 or x = 2

Answer: Number line A.

Answer:

Age difference between oldest the  youngest = 48 years

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: Ratio of ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5, ratios of ages of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5 and sum of the ages of all 3 is 147 years

To find: age difference between oldest the  youngest

Solution:

Let age of Lariba be x years

As ratios of ages of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5,

Age of Esinam = [tex]\frac{3}{5}x[/tex]  years

As ratio of ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5,

Age of Kissi = [tex](\frac{3}{5}) (\frac{3}{5}x)=\frac{9}{25}x[/tex] years

Sum of the ages of all 3 = 147 years

[tex]x+\frac{3}{5}x+\frac{9}{25}x=147\\ \frac{25x+15x+9x}{25}=147\\ x=\frac{147(25)}{49}=75[/tex]

Age of Lariba = x = 75 years

Age of Esinam = [tex]\frac{3}{5}(75)=45\,\,years[/tex]

Age of Kissi = [tex]\frac{9}{25}(75)=27\,\,years[/tex]

So,

Age difference between oldest the  youngest = 75 - 27 = 48 years

Answer: B. although none are exactly 0.3 B is closest

Step-by-step explanation:

a. 35/999 = .0350

b. 31/99 = .3153

c. 105/7333 = .0143

d. 35/111 = .3135

Answer:

6^5

Step-by-step explanation:

6 multiplied with itself 5 times is equal to 6^5

Answer:

The slope of two parallel lines will always be the same. If the slope was slightly different, then the lines would intersect at some point, which breaks the definition of parallel lines.

The y-intercepts of two parallel lines have to be different, or else the two lines would be the same line. If the y-intercept and the slope are the same, then the lines will essentially equal each other.

Answer:

Sample Response: Two parallel lines will have the same slope. The slopes of parallel lines have to be equal. The y-intercepts of those two lines have to be different, otherwise they would be the same line. The x-intercepts of the parallel lines would also be different.

Step-by-step explanation:

edge 2020

So I try to help

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't no sorrry

Answer:

the first one!!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex] y = \frac{ 2}{ 3} x - 2[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]2x - 3y = 6 \\ - 3y = - 2x + 6 \\ \\ y = \frac{ - 2}{ - 3} x + \frac{6}{ - 3} \\ \\ \huge \purple{ \boxed{ y = \frac{ 2}{ 3} x - 2}} \\ this \: is \: in \: the \: slope - intercept \: form.[/tex]

Answer:

y = 2/ 3 x − 2

Step-by-step explanation:

slope intercept is y=mx+b

Answer:

See Explanation

This question is answered using Microsoft Office Excel 2013

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Browser A - 64%

Browser B - 24%

Browser C - 6%

Browser D - 3%

Browser E - 3%

Total Frequency = 50

a.

To tabulate the frequency of the choice of browser, the total frequency is multiplied by each individual percentage as follows;

Browser A - 64% * 50 = 32

Browser B - 24% * 50 = 12

Browser C - 6% * 50 = 3

Browser D - 3%* 50 = 1.5

Browser E - 3% * 50 = 1.5

See Attachment for frequency table (using software)

b. See Attachment for pie chart and bar chart.

Both charts are useful for data presentation but in this case, the pie chart is a better option to use because it shows how the distribution of each browser and how they make up as a whole.

The main circle of the pie chart shows how individual browser are distributed through segments; This is not so for the bars of the bar chart which.

c. Yes, there are changes in the choice of browser.

Aside from Browser D and E that has the same frequency, other browsers (A-C) have different frequency.

Also, the distribution shows that more users make use of browser A than other browsers and the least frequent used browser are browser D and E.

Answer:

The length of the second line is [tex]9\frac{1}{15}[/tex] inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Length of first line = [tex]6\frac{4}{10}[/tex] inches

Length of second line = [tex]2\frac{2}{3}[/tex] inches longer

Required

Length of second line.

Let the length of the second line be represented by x.

From the question, x is [tex]2\frac{2}{3}[/tex] inches longer than the first line;

This implies that:

[tex]x = 2\frac{2}{3} + 6\frac{4}{10}[/tex]

Convert both fractions to improper fractions

[tex]x = \frac{8}{3} + \frac{64}{10}[/tex]

Take LCM

[tex]x = \frac{80 + 192}{30}[/tex]

[tex]x = \frac{272}{30}[/tex]

Convert to mixed fraction

[tex]x = 9\frac{2}{30}[/tex]

Reduce fraction to lowest term

[tex]x = 9\frac{1}{15}[/tex]

Hence, the length of the second line is [tex]9\frac{1}{15}[/tex] inches

Answer:

No, because the​ z-score of Z = 1.06 is not unusual since it does not lie within the range of a usual​ event, namely within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the sample means.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal probability distribution

When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem estabilishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

Unusual

If X is more than two standard deviations from the mean, x is considered unusual.

In this question:

[tex]\mu = 511, \sigma = 119, n = 55, s = \frac{119}{\sqrt{55}} = 16.046[/tex]

A random sample of 55 students from this school was​ selected, and the mean math SAT score was 528. Is the high school justified in its​ claim?

If Z is equal or greater than 2, the claim is justified.

Lets find Z.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{528 - 511}{16.046}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.06[/tex]

1.06 < 2, so 528 is not unusually high.

The answer is:

No, because the​ z-score of Z = 1.06 is not unusual since it does not lie within the range of a usual​ event, namely within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the sample means.

The statement that could be made regarding the high school about the justification of its claim would be:

- No, because the​ z-score of Z = 1.06 is not unusual since it does not lie within the range of a usual​ event, namely within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the sample means.

Given that,

μ = 511

σ = 119

Sample(n) = 55

and

s = [tex]119/\sqrt{55}[/tex]

[tex]= 16.046[/tex]

As we know,

The claim of the high school could be valid and justified only when

[tex]Z > 2[/tex]

To find,

The value of Z

So,

[tex]Z = (X -[/tex] μ )/σ

by putting the values using Central Limit Theorem,

[tex]Z = (528 - 511)/16.046[/tex]

∵ [tex]Z = 1.06[/tex]

Since [tex]Z < 2[/tex], the claim is not justified.

Learn more about "Standard Deviation" here:

brainly.com/question/12402189

Answer:

0.96 radians

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula

1° = [tex]\frac{\pi }{180}[/tex] radians

Multiplying both sides by 55, It becomes

55° = [tex](\frac{\pi }{180} )*55[/tex]

55° = [tex]\frac{55\pi }{180}[/tex]

= 172.8/180

= 0.96 radians

Answer:

The answer is C.

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to divide it by 2 :

∠XYZ = 148° ÷ 2

= 74°

Answer:

Yes additive inverse is two complete opposite numbers if added = 0

Answer:

additive

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the point is not past the postive live or below the negative.

Answer:

The answer is C because DC = BA and DA = CB (given) and AC = CA (reflexive property).

[tex]answers \\ area = 153.86 \: {cm}^{2} \\ circumference = 43.96 \: cm \\ \\ solution \\ radius = 7cm \\ area \: of \: circle = \pi {r}^{2} \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = \: 3.14 \times {7}^{2} \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 3.14 \times 49 \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 153.86 \: {cm}^{2} \\ circumference \: of \: circle = 2\pi \: r \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 2 \times 3.14 \times 7 \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 43.96 \: cm \\ hope \: it \: helps \\ good \: luck \: on \: you r \: assignment[/tex]

Answer:

[tex] Area \: of \: circle = 153.86 \: {cm}^{2} \\ \\ Perimeter \: of \: circle = 43.96 \: cm [/tex]

Given:

Radius of circle (r) = 7 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]Area \: of \: circle = \pi {r}^{2} \\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = \pi \times ({7}^{2} ) \\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = \pi \times 49 \\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 3.14 \times 49 \\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 153.86 \: {cm}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]Circumference \: of \: circle = 2\pi r \\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 2 \times \pi \times 7\\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 14 \times \pi\\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 14 \times 3.14\\ \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 43.96 \: cm[/tex]

Answer:

Brainleist to me!

Step-by-step explanation:

(4p – 6)(4p + 6) =

B)  16 p^2  - 36

just use a online calculator

Answer:

16p²-36

Step-by-step explanation:

1(4p-6)(4p+6)

as we know that (a+b)(a-b)=a²-b²

=(4p)²-(6)²

=16p²-36

The required  exponential function will be F(x)= [tex]4(0.5)^{x}[/tex]

Hence, Option A is the correct.

A relation between a collection of inputs and outputs is known as a function. A function is, to put it simply, a relationship between inputs in which each input is connected to precisely one output.

From the assumption graph as shown in attached figure, we can determine that when x = 0  then y = 4.

Also, we can closely observe that the graph represents decay  

exponential function.

The reason is that when the value of x   increases, the graph of the particular function decreases.

But, the rate of decay must be less than 1 for decay exponential function because if it is greater than 1, then it would represent  the exponential growth function.  

Hence, the option B and D should be completely ruled out as these values represent the exponential growth.  

And from graph, it is clear that when  x = 0 then y = 4

The exponential function will be F(x)= [tex]4(0.5)^{x}[/tex]

To learn more about function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8892191

#SPJ7

Answer:

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

The table above

Required

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result)

This is calculated as follows;

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) =

P (subject had a positive test result) + P (subject had a negative test result)

Calculating P (subject had a positive test result)

This can be calculated by number of subjects with positive results divided by 1000

Only data from the column of subjects with positive results will be considered.

Number of Subjects = Subjects that uses drugs + Subjects that do not use drugs

Number of subjects = 76 + 95

Number of Subjects = 171

P (Subject had a positive test Result) = 171/1000

Calculating P (subject had a negative test result)

This can be calculated by number of subjects with negative results divided by 1000

Only data from the column of subjects with negative results will be considered.

Number of Subjects = Subjects that uses drugs + Subjects that do not use drugs

Number of subjects = 6 + 823

Number of Subjects = 829

P (Subject had a negative test Result) = 829/1000

Hence, P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) =

P (subject had a positive test result) + P (subject had a negative test result) = 171/1000 + 829/1000

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = (171 + 829)/1000

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = 1000/1000

P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = 1

Complete Question

From the mid-1960's to the early 1990's, there was a slow but steady decline in SAT scores. For example, take the Verbal SAT. The average in 1967 was about 543; by 1994, the average was down to about 499. However, the SD stayed close to 110. The drop in average has a large effect on the tails of the distribution.

Estimate the percentage of students scoring over 700 on 1967.

A 0.7%

B  7%

C 7.67%

D 7.6%

Answer:

The correct option is D

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The average  SAT score in 1967 is  [tex]\= x_1 =543[/tex]

     The  standard deviation of score in 1967 is  [tex]\sigma_ 1= 110[/tex]

     The average  SAT score in 1994 is  [tex]\= x_2 = 499[/tex]

      The  standard deviation of score in 1967 is  [tex]\sigma_ 2 = 110[/tex]

The percentage of students scoring over 700 on 1967 is mathematically represented as

   [tex]P(X > 700)[/tex]

Where X is the random variable representing score of student above 700

Now  normalizing the above probability we have

     [tex]P(X > 700) = P(Z > \frac{700 - \= x_1 }{\sigma } )[/tex]

substituting values

      [tex]= P(Z > \frac{700 - \= 543}{110 } )[/tex]

      [tex]= P(Z > 1.83 )[/tex]

Form the normalized z table  

      =  0.076

     =  7.6 %

Answer:

b. 4.9 × 1011

Step-by-step explanation:

Using scientific notation is similar to expressing in standard form. Given that (7 × 105)2

We open the parenthesis. This may first be expressed as

7² × 10⁽⁵⁾²

Then expand,

= 49 × 10¹⁰

To put in scientific notation, 49 = 4.9 × 10

Hence the expression becomes

= 4.9 × 10 × 10¹⁰

Using the laws of indices

= 4.9 ×  10¹¹ in scientific notation

Answer:

4.9 × 1011

Step-by-step explanation:

I did it in grandpoint