pls help i cant find​

Answer:

option A.

Step-by-step explanation:

The regular polygons that can be used to form a regular tessellation are an equilateral triangle, a square, and a regular hexagon.

HOPE THIS HELPS.

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$ 11

Step-by-step explanation:

A game costs $ x.

Two games costs 2x.

50 + 2x = 72

2x = 72 - 50

2x = 22

x = 11

Answer:

Friend 1: $11.53 Frind 2: $5.21 Friend 3: $5.21

Step-by-step explanation:

15.63/3=5.21

One friend pays for the rest.

1.29*3=$3.87=drinks

salad=$2.45

5.21+3.87+2.45=11.53

Answer:

1.5 * 4.7

Step-by-step explanation:

The top adds to 4+.7 = 4.7

The side adds to 1+.5 = 1.5

When they multiply it is

1.5 * 4.7

Answer:

5a

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]5\cdot \:a\\\\[/tex]

5 multiply a

5a

Answer:

1.75 rad

Step-by-step explanation:

° × π/180 = rad

100° × π=314.16

314.16/180=1.75 rad

Answer:

f(x)= -10^x-1-10= (0,-101/100)

f(x)= -3^x-2-1= (0,-10/9)

f(x)= -3^x+5-9= (-252)

f(x)= -17^x-1+2 = (0,33/17)

Answer:

A. 88y -40

Step-by-step explanation:

B is definitely equivalent to 11y-5 because it is reversed so it is the same if it is reversed. and D is equivalent too because 11 divided by 5 equals 2.2 same thing as 22 in this case. and C im not that sure about but i do not think that that is not equivalent...and A. is the answer is NOT equivalent because how the heck do u get 88y-40???????? the answer that is not equivalent is A. 88y-40

Hope this explained well :)

Answer:

The answer is "MS and QS".

Step-by-step explanation:

Given ΔMNQ is isosceles with base MQ, and NR and MQ bisect each other at S. we have to prove that ΔMNS ≅ ΔQNS.

As NR and MQ bisect each other at S

⇒ segments MS and SQ are therefore congruent by the definition of bisector i.e   MS=SQ

In ΔMNS and ΔQNS

MN=QN       (∵ MNQ is isosceles triangle)

∠NMS=∠NQS     (∵ MNQ is isosceles triangle)

MS=SQ         (Given)

By SAS rule, ΔMNS ≅ ΔQNS.

Hence, segments MS and SQ are therefore congruent by the definition of bisector.

The correct option is MS and QS

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

edge

1. cos(30) = a/16

a = 16 x cos(30)

a = 8√3

sin(30) = c/16

c = 16 x sin(30)

c = 8

2. cos(30) = d/28

d = 28 x cos(30)

d = 14√3

sin(30) = f/28

f = 28 x sin(30)

f = 14

3. sin(30) = x/62

x = 62 x sin(30)

x = 31

cos(30) = y/62

y = 62 x cos(30)

y = 31√3

Answer:

  1. (a, c) = (8, 8√3)

  2. (d, f) = (14, 14√3)

  3. (x, y) = (31, 31√3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Side lengths in a 30°-60°-90° triangle have the ratios 1 : √3 : 2. You can multiply these ratio values by an appropriate constant to make them match the lengths in your triangle.

__

1. a : c : 16 = 1 : √3 : 2

Multiply by 16/2 = 8:

  = 8 : 8√3 : 16

  a = 8, c = 8√3

__

2. d : f : 28 = 1 : √3 : 2

Multiply by 28/2 = 14:

  = 14 : 14√3 : 28

  d = 14, f = 14√3

__

3. x : y : 62 = 1 : √3 : 2

Multiply by 62/2 = 31:

  = 31 : 31√3 : 62

  x = 31, y = 31√3

Answer:

290 centimetres

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of the length of the pieces of wood is 6 : 10 : 12.

We have to find the total ratio first:

6 + 10 + 12 = 28

The longer piece of wood has ratio 10.

The length of the original wooden plank is 812 centimetres, therefore, the length of the longer piece of wood is:

10/28 * 812 = 290 centimetres

Answer:

$29.50

Step-by-step explanation:

The price that Rob paid includes a 15% discount.  This means that Rob paid 85% of the original price.

100% - 15% = 85%

Divide the price Rob paid by the percentage the price is of the total.

85% = 0.85

50.15/0.85 = 59

Now, divide the total price by 2 so that you can find the price of one pair of jeans.

59/2 = 29.50

The price of one pair of jeans is $29.50

Answer:

slope = [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Calculate the slope m using the slope formula

m = [tex]\frac{y_{2}-y_{1} }{x_{2}-x_{1} }[/tex]

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (- 2, 3) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (2, 4)

m = [tex]\frac{4-3}{2+2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Answer:

47

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You didn't give your options, but it doesn't matter. We'll find all the possibilities and then you can pick it from your list.

When I teach this in Algebra 2, I call it the "the c over d thing" and all my students know EXACTLY to what I am referring. "c" is the constant and "d" is the leading coefficient. The combination of c/d give you the possibilities of roots for the polynomial. There are no real roots that a polynomial can have other than the possibilities we find when we do the c/d thing.

Our c is a 20.  All the factors of 20 are as follows (notice that we have both the positive and negative factors):

20: ±1, ±2, ±4, ±5, ±10, ±20

Our d is a 3.  All the factors of 3 are as follows (again, both the + and the -):

3: ±1, ±3 and that's it for 3.

c/d is as follows. Make sure you put ever c over every d!!!:

c/d: ±[tex]\frac{1}{1}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{2}{1}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{4}{1}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{5}{1}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{10}{1}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{20}{1}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{5}{3}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{10}{3}[/tex], ±[tex]\frac{20}{3}[/tex]

Those are all the possibilities for your roots for that polynomial. As long as the roots are real (and they won't always all be real!), there are no roots but these.

Answer:

its D on edge

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Correct option: A -> AA postulate

Step-by-step explanation:

In the figure we can see that in triangle ABC we have:

A = 53°

B = 72°

And we can see in the triangle LMN that:

L = 53°

M = 72°

We have two pairs of angles (A - L  and B - M) that are congruent, and therefore we can use the case AA (angle-angle) to affirm that these triangles are similar.

So the correct option is A: AA postulate.

Answer:

option B -> 23 units

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question we need to find the length of each side, and we can do this finding the distance between the pair of points that make a side, using the formula:

[tex]dist = \sqrt{(x_1 - x_2)^{2} + (y_1 - y_2)^{2} }[/tex]

Where the points are [tex](x_1, y_1)[/tex] and [tex](x_2, y_2)[/tex].

So, using the points A = (-4, -2), B = (-1, 2), C = (2, 2), D = (5, -1) and E = (2, -4), we have that:

[tex]AB = \sqrt{(-4 - (-1))^{2} + (-2 - 2)^{2} } = 5[/tex]

[tex]BC = \sqrt{(-1 - 2)^{2} + (2 - 2)^{2} } = 3[/tex]

[tex]CD = \sqrt{(2 - 5)^{2} + (2 - (-1))^{2} } = 4.2426[/tex]

[tex]DE = \sqrt{(5 - 2)^{2} + (-1 - (-4))^{2} } = 4.2426[/tex]

[tex]EA = \sqrt{(2 - (-4))^{2} + (-4 - (-2))^{2} } = 6.3246[/tex]

So the perimeter of ABCDE is:

[tex]P(ABCDE) = AB + BC + CD + DE + EA[/tex]

[tex]P(ABCDE) = 5 + 3 + 4.2426 + 4.2426 + 6.3246 = 22.8098[/tex]

Rounding to nearest whole number we have:

[tex]P(ABCDE) = 23[/tex]

So the answer is the option B.

Answer:

y= -8x

Step-by-step explanation:

theirs no b because it goes through (0,0)

to find slope you do 800-(-800) over -100-100

hope this helps:)

Don't know if there was supposed to be another option but, it would be distribute over (x - 8).

Answer:

Distribute 3/4 over (x - 8)

Step-by-step explanation:

brainliest please and can yall please thank me and give five stars

Answer:

(A)[tex]128^{x/3}[/tex]

(D)[tex](4(2^{1/3}))^x[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to determine which of the expression is equivalent to:

[tex]\sqrt[3]{128}^ x[/tex]

By the law of indices:

[tex]\sqrt[3]{128}=128^{1/3}\\$Therefore:\\\sqrt[3]{128}^ x \\=(128^{1/3})^x\\=128^{x/3}[/tex]

Similarly:

[tex]\sqrt[3]{128}^ x \\=\sqrt[3]{64*2}^ x\\=(4\sqrt[3]{2})^ x\\=(4(2^{1/3}))^x[/tex]

The expressions that are equivalent to (∛128)ˣ are; (128)^(x/3) and (4(2^(1/3))ˣ

We want to find the expression that is equivalent to (∛128)ˣ

From law of indices, we have that;

(∛128)ˣ = [(128)^(1/3)]ˣ

This can be further expressed as;

(128)^(x/3)

Similarly, we have the simplified expression at;

[(128)^(1/3)]ˣ = (64 * 2)^(x/3)

⇒ (4³ * 2)^(x/3)

⇒ (4(2^(1/3))ˣ

Read more about law of indices at; https://brainly.com/question/11761858

#SPJ6

Answer:

The height of a baseball, in feet, is represented by this expression, where t is time in seconds.

-16t2+64t+3

The height of the baseball after 3.5 seconds is ___ feet.

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the provided expression.

The height of a baseball, in feet, is represented by this expression, where t is time in seconds.

[tex]h=-16t^2+64t+3[/tex]

To find the height of the baseball  after 3.5 seconds, substitute the value of t = 3.5 in above expression

[tex]h=-16(3.5)^2+64(3.5)+3h\\\\=-16(12.25)+224+3h\\\\=-196+227h=31[/tex]

Hence, the height of the baseball after 3.5 seconds is 31 feet.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete. Here is the complete question.

The height of a baseball, in feet, is represented by this expression -16t²+64t+3, where t is time in seconds. The height of the baseball after 3.5 seconds is___ feet.

Given the height of the baseball modeled by the equation

h(t)  = -16t²+64t+3

To get the height of the baseball after 3,5secs, we will substitute t = 3.5s into the equation of the height as shown;

[tex]h(3.5) = -16(3.5)^{2} +64(3.5)+3\\h(3.5) = -16(12.25)+224+3\\ h(3.5) = -196+224+3\\ h(3.5) = -193+224\\ h(3.5) = 31feet[/tex]

The height of the baseball after 3.5 seconds is 31feet.

Answer:

Option (4). 135°

Step-by-step explanation:

From the figure attached,

Two pair of vertical angles have been given,

∠ABD and ∠CBE

∠ABE and ∠CBD

One pair of angles ∠ABD and ∠CBE are acute angles which are less than 90°.

Similarly, other pair ∠ABE and ∠DBC are obtuse angles which are more than 90°.

Therefore, out of the given options measure of one pair ∠DBC and ∠ABE should be 135°.

Option (4) will be the answer.

Answer:

Correct option: First one -> Hexagonal prism

Step-by-step explanation:

In the figure we have two hexagons and six rectangles. If we fold each part correctly, we can use the two hexagons as horizontal bases of a prism, and the six rectangles would be the sides of the prism (each rectangle connected to one side of lower hexagon and one side of upper hexagon).

So the figure created would be a hexagonal prism.

Correct option: First one.

Answer:

First one

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The approximate solution to the system is (1.2, 4.4)

x = 1.2 and y = 4.4

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution of the system of linear equations equation y = –0.25x + 4.7 and y = 4.9x – 1.64 is shown in the attached graph. The red line represents the equation y = –0.25x + 4.7 and the blue line represents the equation  = 4.9x – 1.64.

The solution of the system of equations is their point of intersection shown on the graph.

The point of intersection is (1.231, 4.392). To the nearest tenth, it is (1.2, 4,4). So x = 1.2 and y = 4.4.

So the approximate solution to the system is (1.2, 4.4)

Answer:

the answer is ( 2 , 1 ) I hope thus helps

Answer:

(2,1)

Step-by-step explanation:

Average the x values and the y values out

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\sqrt{x} Distance=\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^{2}+(y_{2}-y_{1})^{2}}\\\\\sqrt{(5-3)^{2}+(6-k)^{2}}=2\sqrt{2}\\\\\sqrt{(2)^{2}+[(6)^{2}-(2*6*k)+(k)^{2}]}=2\sqrt{2}\\\\\sqrt{4+[36-12k+k^{2}]}=2\sqrt{2}\\\\\sqrt{40-12k+k^{2}}=2\sqrt{2}\\[/tex]

Take square both side

[tex]40-12k+k^{2}=(2\sqrt{2})^{2}\\\\40-12k+k^{2}=4*2\\\\40-12k+k^{2}=8\\\\k^{2}-12k+40-8=0\\\\k^{2}-12k+32=0\\[/tex]

Factorize,

Sum = -12

Product = 32

Factors = -8 , -4

k² - 8k - 4k + (-8)*(-4) = 0

k(k - 8) - 4(k - 8) = 0

(k - 8)(k - 4) = 0

k = 8 or 4

The points are (3,k) and (5,6).

Given, distance = 2√2 units

Applying distance formula,

Distance = √(x2-x1)^2 + (y2-y1)^2

2√2 = √(x2-x1)^2 + (y2-y1)^2

Squaring both sides,

(2√2)^2 = [√(x2-x1)^2 + (y2-y1)^2]^2

8 = (x2-x1)^2 + (y2-y1)^2

8 = (5-3)^2 + (6-k)^2

8 = 2^2 + (6^2 - 2x6xk + k^2)

8 = 4 + 36 - 12k + k^2

8 = 40 - 12k + k^2

= k^2 - 12k + 32 = 0

On factorising,

=> k^2 - 4k - 8k + 32 = 0

=> k(k-4) -8(k-4) = 0

=> (k-4)(k-8) = 0

=> k-4 = 0 , k-8 = 0

=> k = 4 , k = 8

Answer:

- 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Calculate the gradient (slope) m using the slope formula

m = [tex]\frac{y_{2}-y_{1} }{x_{2}-x_{1} }[/tex]

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (- 5, - 2) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (- 3, - 8)

m = [tex]\frac{-8-(-2)}{-3-(-5)}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-8+2}{-3+5}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-6}{2}[/tex] = - 3

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

Every x value in the domain should only have 1 y value. In the graph, for x=5 (the input) there are 2 y values (6 and -6) so this is not a function.

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

it fails the vertical line test.  there is more than 1 y value per x value

Answer:

same

Step-by-step explanation:

The maximum of f(x) is 8 because it's written in vertex notation. From the graph, g(x)'s maximum is 8 so the answer is that they have the same maximum.