Solve five and three sixths minus two and one third.

( Im Giving brainliest and extra points on this one :D)


A) Two and three eighteenths

B) Two and two ninths

C) Three and two ninths

D) Three and three eighteenths

Answer:

105

Step-by-step explanation:

The hot air balloon descends 22.498 feet after 3.333 seconds.

The situation indicates that the height decrease is directly proportional to time. The distance is equal to the product of speed (v), in feet per second, and time (t), in seconds.

s ∝ t

s = v · t        (1)

If we know that v= 6.75 ft / s and t = 3.333 ft, then the change in the height of the hot air balloon is:

s = (6.75 ft / s) · (3.333 s)

s = 22.498 ft

The hot air balloon descends 22.498 feet after 3.333 seconds.

To learn more on direct variation: https://brainly.com/question/14254277

#SPJ1

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

9x is equal to 9 multiplied by x.

x=4 so it is 9 x 4

9 x 4=36

Answer:

<

Step-by-step explanation:

7 2/5 = 37/5

7 3/5 = 52/7

~~~~~~~~~~~

37/5 times 7 = 259/35

52/7 times 5 = 260/35

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Subtract then you difference is one, therefor 7 3/5 is greater.

Answer:

the answer is 68

Answer:

(a) What percent of all field goal attempts did Seth Fitzgerald make? (Enter your answers rounded to two decimal places.)

Seth Fitzgerald's overall field goal percentage:__59.69%_____

What percent of all field goal attempts did Roberto Mantovani make? (Enter your answers rounded to two decimal places.)

Roberto Mantovani's overall field goal percentage: ______40.31%________.

(b) Find the percent of all two-point field goals and all three-point field goals that both Seth and Roberto made. (Enter your answers rounded to two decimal places.)

Seth Fitzgerald's two-pointers: _____58.57%_________%

Roberto Mantovani's two-pointers:_____41.43%______ %

Seth Fitzgerald's three-pointers:_____64.58%_______

Roberto Mantovani's three-pointers:_____35.42%_____

(c) Roberto had a lower percent than Seth for both types of field goals, but had a better overall percent. That sounds impossible, select the correct statement concerning the situation.

i) This is an example of Simpson's paradox. The comparison that holds for both field goal groups is reversed when the groups are combined into one group

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Benedict College 2014-2020 men's basketball team:

                               Seth Fitzgerald   Roberto Mantovani        Total

                               Made  Missed        Made   Missed       Made    Missed

Two-pointers          123         118              87           84           210        205

Three-pointers         31            6              17              2            48             8

Total                       154         124           104            86          258        210

a) All field goal attempts = 258 (154 + 104)

Field goal attempts by Seth Fitzgerald = 154/258 * 100 = 59.69%

Goal 154 - 124 = 30/258 * 100 = 11.63%

Roberto Mantovani = 104/258*100 = 40.31%

Goal 104 - 86 = 18/258 *100 = 6.98%

Percent of all two-point field goals and all three-point field goals that both Seth and Roberto made:

Goals by both = 48 (30 + 18) = 48/258*100 = 18.61 (11.63 + 6.98)

Seth Fitzgerald's two-pointers = 123/210*100 = 58.57%

Roberto Mantovani's two-pointers = 87/210*100 = 41.43%

Seth Fitzgerald's three-pointers = 31/48*100 = 64.58%

Roberto Mantovani's three-pointers = 17/48*100 = 35.42%

b) Simpson's paradox, also called Yule-Simpson effect, says that when we combine all of the groups together (e.g. two-pointer and three-pointer games played by Seth and Roberto respectively) and look at the data in total form, the correlation that we noticed before may reverse itself.  The cause of this reversion is lurking variables or numerical values of the data.

Answer:

sbsjsjsvshwjbqvsjanavshsjsnsbsvsbsbsbssv d sms and avjaaush e as his new s snwqlpasn s w

Answer:

Jim walked 17/28 for miles than Russel

Step-by-step explanation:

First you turn 6/7 and 1/4 to have the same denominators. In that case you find the least common multiple which is 28.

7: 7, 14, 21, 28

4: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28

Next you multiply the top and the bottom of your fraction my the factor you used to get 28 for your denominator

6/7 x 4/4 = 24/28

1/4 x 7/7 = 7/28

Lastly, you subtract the products you got.

24/28 - 7/28 = 17/28

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Option A. 0.296 and 0.9888 is correct because rational no are terminating and repeating ..

Answer:

the answer is c

Step-by-step explanation:hope this helps

Answer:

C or the third option, 3/4 x + 10

Step-by-step explanation:

100% correct please mark brainlist. HAVE A GREAT DAY

Answer: y= 3/2x+1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2 3/4 ÷ 4 1/8

23/4×8/41

23×8/4×41

46/41

=1.122

So the answer is 1.122

The solution after divide 2 3/4 by 4 1/8 in fraction form is,

⇒ 2/3

We have to given that,

To divide 2 3/4 by 4 1/8.

Simplify it as,

2 3/4 ÷ 4 1/8

11/4 ÷ 33/8

11/4 x 8/33

(11 x 8) / (4x33)

2/3

Therefore, The solution after divide 2 3/4 by 4 1/8 in fraction form is,

⇒ 2/3

Learn more about the divide visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28119824

#SPJ6

Answer is : A .. Hope it helped

Answer:

Test statistic Z= 1.713

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

A researcher wants to test if the mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is

different from $110,000

Mean of the Population  μ = $110,000

Sample size 'n' = 53

Mean of the sample x⁻ = $114,000.

standard deviation of the Population = $17,000,

Level of significance = 0.01

Null hypothesis :

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

H₀:  x⁻ =  μ

Alternative Hypothesis :  x⁻ ≠  μ

Step(ii):-

Test statistic

                 [tex]Z = \frac{x^{-}-mean }{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

                 [tex]Z = \frac{114000-110000}{\frac{17000}{\sqrt{53} } }[/tex]

                Z =  1.7130

Tabulated value Z = 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

Answer:

27

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes, by 27 times

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope it helps you

Answer:

x = = -5 ; y = -1 ; z = 4      [tex]\bigg | = 3 \bigg |[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of the plane through (1,-4,0) is,

a(x-1) + b(y+4) + c(z+0) = 0 ....... (1)

Again the plane is perpendicular to the vector (5,1,-4)

So, the direction ratios of the normal to the plane is proportional to the direction ratios of the vector (5,1,-4)

So, a/(5) = b/(1) = c/(-4 )

Let,a/(5) = b/(1) = c/(-4 ) = k

So, a = 5k, b = k and c = -4k

So, from (1) we have,

(5k)(x-1) + (k)(y+4) + (-4k)(z+0) = 0

Thus;

-5(x-1) -(y+4) +4(z+0) = 0

So,

-5x +1 -y-4+4z+0 =0

-5x - y +4z -3 = 0

-5x - y +4z = 3

x = = -5 ; y = -1 ; z = 4      [tex]\bigg | = 3 \bigg |[/tex]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  $98.11

Step-by-step explanation:

If your calculator doesn't work with mixed numbers, you must first convert 6 5/8% to a decimal fraction.

  6 5/8 = (6·8+5)/8 = 53/8 = 6.625

  6 5/8% = 0.01×6.625 = 0.06625

Then the desired amount is ...

  0.06625 × $1480.90 = $98.109625 ≈ $98.11

6 5/8% of $1,480.90 is $98.11.

The equation of the line of best fit that Brianna drew is: c. y = 2x + 5

Recall:

Thus:

Slope of a line (m) = change in y/change in x

Change in y = 2 units

Change in x = 1 unit

Slope = 2/1 = 2

The y-intercept is the point where the line of best fit intercepts the y-axis which is at y = 5.

y-intercept (b) = 5

Substitute b = 5 and m = 2 into y = mx + b

y = 2x + 5

Learn more about line of best fit on:

https://brainly.com/question/17143626

Answer:

c    ..)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It does!

Step-by-step explanation:

A linear function has one independent variable and one dependent variable. The independent variable is x and the dependent variable is y.

Source: Columbia.edu

(I'm greedy and want points )

Answer:

It’s 40 I’m pretty sure because of the square. That’s how I was taught.

Answer:

9 hours or less. with a $3 off coupon she could spend up to $54. divide that by $6 per hour and that gives you a possibility of nine hours of boat rental.

Answer:

140

Explanation:

an=-12+4(n-2)

an=-12+4([40]-2)

an=-12+4(38)

an=-152-12

an=140

The 40th term in the sequence defined by aₙ= -12+4(n-2) is 140

using AP formula,

aₙ = a + (n - 1)d

where

a = first term

d = common difference

n = number of terms

Therefore,

aₙ = -12 + 4(n-2)

n = 40

a₄₀ = -12 + 4(40 - 2)

a₄₀ = -12 + 4(38)

a₄₀ = -12 + 152

a₄₀ = 140

The 40th term of the sequence is 140.

learn more about arithmetic progression here: https://brainly.com/question/22069667?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

1.11.83

2. 20.12

3. 28.28

4. 33.91

5.80.62

6.24.08

7.17.32

8. 15.81

9. 16.85

10. 28.18

Step-by-step explanation:

pls make me brainliest

Answer: 10 days

Step-by-step explanation: So if the librarian sorted at a constant rate, then they sorted the same amount of books all 6 days. If they still have 200 books left to sort, then they sorted 300 books over 6 days. This means that they sorted 50 books per day. 200 divided by 50 is 4. So it will take 4 more days to finish sorting all the books. So altogether, it will take 10 days to sort all of the books.

The total number of required days is 10.

In order to solve a problem for two different values of a quantity, its unit value is first derived. This method is known as unitary method.

The total number of books is 500.

The books left after 6 days is 200.

The number books read per day is given as,

(500 - 200)/6

= 300/6

= 50

Now, number of days the remaining number of books to be read is,

200/50 = 4

Thus, the total number of days is 6 + 4 = 10.

Hence, it will take 10 days from the start to finish all the books.

To know more about unitary method click on,

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1

Answer:

0.7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.35

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$13.92

Step-by-step explanation: