Answer:
Correct answer is Babylonian Captivity .
Explanation:
Correct answer is Babylonian Captivity, because this is an event from 6th Century BC which led to the dispersion of Jews from their homeland.
Crucificition of Jesus and burning of 2nd temple are events connected with Roman reign in Judea, while Solomon's Mines are a mythical story about mines of king Solomon.
How did stock speculation endanger the economy?
A. It made real values more important than paper values.
B. It lowered the value of the dollar.
C. It made companies seem like they were more valuable than they really were.
D. It forced companies to issue less stock than they wanted to.
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
Stock Speculation endangered the economy in such a way that the people constantly kept on checking the stock market and they got nervous and scared that they might loose all of their money.
Companies along with the people also were also scared of the loss and losing money so they started selling their stocks to prevent the loss.
Due to this reason, the prices of the stock market decreases as most of the people and company issued less stock than they wanted to because of the fear that they will loose all their money.
Answer:
It forced companies to issue less stock than they wanted to.
The Bay of Pigs plan was to train Cuban exiles and then help them get rid of Castro
A. True
B. False
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In this lesson, we identified many uses of geography. One example is urban planning. How would geography be useful
in helping to plan the future of a community? Give your response in the form of a short paragraph.
Answer:
It would be useful in helping plan the future of a community, since through it people can better understand their environment, as well as their collective existence in space and their differences with other groups.
In the 1960s, Bob Dylan became famous for
writing a popular novel titled On the Road.
composing influential countercultural music.
founding the Students for a Democratic Society.
organizing protests on college campuses.
Answer:
composing influential countercultural music
Explanation:
Bob Dylan became famous for composing influential counter-cultural music.
Who is Bob Dylan?Bob Dylan, whose legal name is Robert Dylan Zimmerman, is an American singer and songwriter. He is regarded as one of the greatest songwriters of all time.
Bob Dylan was born on May 24, 1941, and brought up in St. Louis County, Minnesota. He made his breakthrough as a songwriter with the release of The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan in 1963.
He is the first songwriter to win the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2016. When he was awarded the Nobel Prize, The New York Times stated that he is the first musician to win this Prize.
When he released his album Freewheelin' Bob Dylan, he didn't follow the same rules as pop artists when he was added to the folk category. He had his own unique style.
Hence, Option (B) is correct.
Learn more about Bob Dylan here:
https://brainly.com/question/22740126
#SPJ5
…Whenever the legislators [lawmakers] try to take away, and destroy the property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are then no longer required to give their obedience. When legislators try to take for themselves, or put into the hands of others, absolute power over the lives, liberties, and property of the people, by this breaking of trust they forfeit the power which the people had put into their hands… –Two Treatises of Government, John Locke, 1690 According to Locke, what happens when legislators take away property? People may become more supportive of the government. People have the right to stop doing what the government says. People are more likely to give the government more power. People may decide to return to a more natural state.
Answer:
People have the right to stop doing what the government says.
Explanation:
According to the text, when the legislators of a region take maleficent attitudes to the people, such as destroying the people's property, taking away all their autonomy and placing them as slaves, the legislators promote the existence of civil disobedience. This is because, since the people are hurt by their legislators, the people have the complete right to fight back and refuse to do what the government determines.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
How were Jews transported to the Death Camps?
Why is JFK wearing a dark suite during this debate?
A. to make him look thinner
B. stand out against the gray background
C. Reduce glare
D. both to reduce glare and to stand out against the background are correct
Answer:
B ( stand out against the gray background)
Explanation:
it's on national geographic. Nixon was wearing a light suit that made him blend in with the background while Kennedy wore a dark suit that made him stand out.
Think of one thing that you think may be invented and used by the masses in 2120.
Answer:
flying cars
Explanation:
as technology advances, I believe that our IT workers will produce a prolific amount of flying cars that will utilize greenhouse gases as fuel.
Describe the features of the indus valley civilization which make it unique in the history of ancient India
Answer:
The development of urban centers, script on seals, advancement of technologies and urban sanitation systems.
Explanation:
The development of urban centers, script on seals, advancement of technologies and urban sanitation systems are the features of the Indus valley civilization which make it unique in the history. They developed urban centers where people comes from surrounding areas for trade. They also used advance technology of measuring length and mass. They also formed the world's first known urban sanitation systems.
Which statement best describes the Indian
Removal Act of 1830?
A) The act forcibly relocated eastern American Indians to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River
B) The act forcibly removed territory from the Cherokee and auctioned it off to prospectors
C) The act created a constitution for the five tribes that had been forcibly removed to Indian Territory
D) The act stated that the Cherokee had signed a treaty to give up their lands
A) The act forcibly relocated eastern American Indians to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River
I can't really explain it, that's just what the treaty stated.
The statement best describes the Indian Removal Act of 1830 as The act forcibly relocated eastern American Indians to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River. Thus the correct option is A.
What is the Indian Removal Act of 1830?President Andrew Jackson was given the authority to communicate with Native American tribes about being deported from their traditional territories under the Indian Removal Act (1830).
All American Indians residing in the present-day states and territories were to be removed and sent to western isolated areas. The country's citizens are now able to live all along the eastern coast due to this settlement, which aids white settlement.
The act forcibly relocated eastern American Indians to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River and helps white settlers. Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about the Indian Removal Act of 1830, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9367389
#SPJ7
some people argue that air is not a economic good. Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement in
4-5 complete sentences
Answer:I agree with this statement to a certain degree as air cannot be brought and sold it’s the only thing that can’t be taken physically from someone even if you are poor or don’t own much money u are a blé to breath without the need to think of expenses
Explanation:
Identify the three differences in the city design of New Delhi and Shahjanabad.
Answer:
Three differences were: (i) Shahjahanabad was crowded with mohallas, and several dozen bazaars. But New Delhi was not crowded nor were there mazes of narrow bylanes. (ii) Shahjahanabad was not established in a planned manner while New Delhi was beautifully planned.
Explanation:
Why did some Puerto Ricans resent U.S. control of their government?
Answer/Explanation:
Puerto Ricans resented U.S. control of their administration because they dealt with like kids and limits were set on their personal opportunity.
Post Spanish-American War:
Puerto Rico resented U.S. control.
Foraker Act ended U.S. military rule, set up civil government.
1917, Puerto Ricans made U.S. citizens.
Which of the following statements is true
Answer:
theres no other answer choices
Explanation:
i dont know how to help u
The _______________ concludes that Nation-states should not interfere in economic matters.
Group of answer choices
Tabula Rasa Philosophy
Deism Philosophy
Free Enterprise System
Enlightenment
Answer: Free Enterprise System
Explanation:
The Free Enterprise system is also referred to as the Market Economic system and it refers to a situation whereby the economic decisions in a nation are taken by the individuals or the firms.
In such economic system, the role of the government is minimal and is usually not involved in the market.
In the article Civil Rights Act of 1964
PART A: How do paragraphs 8-9 contribute to the development of ideas in the text?
A
They prove that the bill was altered to allow discrimination to continue on a state level.
B
They emphasize the obstacles the bill encountered before it became a law.
C
They reveal how disorganized the United States government was during the 1960s.
D
They show how the United States government unfairly infringed upon the rights of local government.
Answer:
They reveal how disorganized the United States government was during the 1960s. (Option C)
Explanation:
I took the test on E2020!
Also COuld U plz answer the question on my acc thx.
Answer:
c
Explanation:because I did it on commonlit
What were called winners of the Persian wars?
Answer: The Greeks won a decisive victory, losing only 192 men to the Persians' 6,400 (according to the historian Herodotus).
893 BCE is in this century:
A 19th Century BCE
B 8th Century BCE
C 9th Century BCE
D 18th Century BCE
Answer:
C. 9th Century BCE
Explanation:
Given that based on the formation of the calendar we are utilizing, the 1st Century started from year 1 to the first 100 years. This is based on the principle that there was nothing like year zero. Thereby the 2nd Century began from and lasted between the years 101 to 200.
Therefore, it is inferred that for example for the 9th Century B.C.E. we are citing the years 900 to 801 B.C.E.
Hence, for the year 893 B.C.E., we have 9th century BCE.
If you were from a southern state like Virginia, why might you oppose Hamilton's plan to gather all state debts into a single national debt
Select the best answer from the choices provided.
OA.
That move would favor President Washington and his supporters.
ОВ.
You want your state to pay off its debts by itself.
Ос.
The Supreme Court supports this move.
D.
Your state has already paid its debts.
Answer:
D
Southern states had very little businesses, as is was just mainly farming. So the south didn't had much expenses from farming that would increase their debt.
What were THREE results of the 1929 Stock Market crash?
Hitler, Speech to Reichstag, 1937
During recent years Germany has entered into quite a number of political agreements with other States. She has resumed former agreements and improved them. And I may say that she has established close friendly relations with a number of States.
Through a number of treaties which we have made, we have relieved many strained relations and thereby made a substantial contribution towards an improvement in European conditions.
Germany has steadily given its assurance, and I solemnly repeat this assurance here, that between ourselves and France, for example, there are no grounds for quarrel that are humanly thinkable.
To place this whole matter in its true light, I should like to call attention to the following bare facts: —
For many years the German people have been trying to make better commercial treaties with their neighbors
Germany has an enormous number of men who not only want to work but also to eat..
It is to be regretted that the British Government [were partly to blame for] the Treaty of Versailles... Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people.
[Another] division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic [Communist] doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations…
The questions are:
what is Hitler saying about Germany?
what is Hitler saying about Britain?
what is Hitler saying about Communism?
Answer: I think Hitler is stating that Germany gained a lot of allies over the years and improved Germany as a whole.
Hitler is blaming Britain because they made the Treaty of Versailles and he is saying that the German people suffered the most from this Treaty (you could probably look more up specifically on the Treaty of Versailles to get a better idea of why he’s saying the German people suffered more)
Hitler is saying that communism is necessary and or essential to make Germany “complete.”
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Germany was willing to take an aggressive stance with its neighbors.
Explanation:
From comparing quality of life in EU and Non EU countries, in which country can you expect to live the longest?
O Spain
O Italy
O Greece
O Norway
PLS HELP ASAP pls shs
Answer:
borrow money and tax
Explanation:
because congress couldn't do this under the articles they had to draft the constitution to grant these powers
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects those accused of crimes from so-called “double jeopardy”. Which selection below defines "double jeopardy"?
Select one:
A. issued a summary judgement and a jury trial
B. tried for the same crime twice
C. imprisoned without charges
D. forced to sit accused with co-defendants also accused
Answer: a
Explanation:
Answer: The correct answer is actually B. Tried for the same crime twice.
Explanation: I did the quiz and I chose answer choice A and got it wrong. So the girl or boy above me got it wrong but good try. : )
the question & answer choices are in the picture
How do you write 4% as a fraction or mixed number?
Answer:
4% as a fraction is 2/5.
Explanation:
:)))
Answer:
4% as a fraction is 4/100 = 1/25
Why did the industrial revolution begin in
England and not somewhere else? What
advantages did they have?
Explanation:
They had more "technology", weapons and people at those times
Which expression is equivalent to 24 + 64? (5 points)
a 8(3 + 64)
b 8(16 + 56)
c 8(3 + 8)
d 8(16 + 64)
Where has Douglass completed most of his work?
Answer:
After he was separated from his mother as an infant, Douglass lived for a time with his maternal grandmother, Betty Bailey. However, at the age of six, he was moved away from her to live and work on the Wye House plantation in Maryland.
It’s right I did it on common lit
HELP NEEDED PRONTO!! :(
Why do you think Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, who freed his own slaves, rules this way? Explain in 5 sentences.
On March 6, 1857, in the case of Dred Scott v. John Sanford, United States Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney ruled that African Americans were not and could not be citizens. Taney wrote that the Founders' words in the Declaration of Independence, “all men were created equal,” were never intended to apply to blacks. Blacks could not vote, travel, or even fall in love and marry of their own free will — rights granted, according to the Declaration, by God to all. It was the culmination of ten years of court battles — Dred Scott's fight to live and be recognized as a free man.
The High Court's decision went even further, declaring laws that restricted slavery in new states or sought to keep a balance between free and slave states, such as the Missouri Compromise, were unconstitutional. In essence, Black Americans, regardless of where they lived, were believed to be nothing more than commodities.
The Taney court was dominated by pro-slavery judges from the South. Of the nine, seven judges had been appointed by pro-slavery Presidents — five, in fact, came from slave-holding families. The decision was viewed by many as a victory for the Southern “Slavocracy,” and a symbol of the power the South had over the highest court.
The dramatic ripple effect of Dred Scott — a ruling historians widely agree was one of the worst racially-based decisions ever handed down by the United States Supreme Court — reached across the states and territories. It sent shivers through the North and the free African-American community. Technically, no black was free of re-enslavement.
Free Blacks, many of whom had been in Northern states for years, once again lived in fear of being hunted down and taken back to the South in servitude. Southern slave laws allowed marshals to travel north in search of escaped slaves. The ruling was such a concern to Free Blacks, that many seriously considered leaving the United States for Canada or Liberia.
The decision played a role in propelling Abraham Lincoln — an outspoken anti-slavery voice — into the White House. The slavery issue had already created a turbulent, volatile atmosphere throughout the nation. Dred Scott, like kerosene tossed onto a simmering fire, played a significant role in igniting the Civil War. The North became ready to combat what it viewed as the South's disproportionate influence in government.
The court case lives in infamy today, but few people know much about the actual people involved. I suspect Scott and Taney never imagined they would play such powerful roles in our great American story.
Taney was from Maryland, a slave state, but had long before emancipated his slaves and reportedly paid pensions to his older slaves, as well. As a young lawyer he called slavery a “blot on our national character.” What turned Taney into a pro-slavery advocate is not clear, but by 1857, Taney had hardened, going as far as to declare the abolitionist movement “northern aggression.”
In 1836, Scott married Harriett Robinson. Reports vary on whether she was a slave of Emerson's prior to the marriage or Emerson purchased her from another military officer after she and Scott had fallen in love. The series of events underscored the painful and difficult lives slaves led. Love, like everything else, was subject to the vagaries of their owners' dispositions.
Emerson died in 1843, leaving the Scott family to his wife, Irene. Three years later, Scott tried to buy his freedom, but to no avail. Scott's only recourse was to file suit against Mrs. Emerson. He did so on April 6, 1846, and the case went to a Missouri court the following year. He would lose this case, but win on appeal in 1850. Emerson won her appeal in 1852, and shortly afterward gave the Scotts to her son, John Sanford, a legal resident of New York. Because two states were now involved, Scott's appeal was filed in federal court in 1854 under the case name of Dred Scott v. John Sanford, the name that came before Taney in 1857.
History is filled with dramatic and strange twists of irony and fate. Those factors can be found throughout Scott's battle for freedom. Peter Blow's sons, childhood friends of Scott's, paid his legal fees. Irene Emerson had remarried in 1850. Her new husband, Massachusetts Congressman Calvin Chaffee, was anti-slavery. Following Taney's ruling, the now-Mrs. Calvin Chaffee, took possession of Dred, Harriett and their two daughters and either sold or simply returned the family to the Blows. In turn, the Blows freed the Scotts in May, 1857.
Dred Scott, a man whose name is so deeply-rooted in our history, so linked to the war that would end slavery, would die just five months later of tuberculosis. However, he died a free man.