Answer: first answer choice
Step-by-step explanation:
They give us that f(0) and g(0) = 4 and f(2) = g(2) = 0, so the answer is simply the first one. When x=0, y=4 for both and when x=2, y=0 for both.
Hope that helped,
-sirswagger21
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
on edge
Please answer this correctly
Answer:
24.99
Step-by-step explanation:
If the area of the quarter circle is 38.465, then the equation to find this would be
3.14*r^2 / 4 = 38.465. we solve for r, the radius, and get two solutions. 7 and -7. Obviously the length of the radius can't be -7, so we know the radius is 7.
Now we must solve for the perimeter. The perimeter is equal to 2r + (2*3.14*r)/4
Plugging 7 in as the radius, r, we get 24.99 as our final answer.
1. If the ratio of the ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5 and that of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5 and the sum of the ages of all 3 is 147 years, what is the age difference between oldest the
youngest?
Answer:
Age difference between oldest the youngest = 48 years
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: Ratio of ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5, ratios of ages of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5 and sum of the ages of all 3 is 147 years
To find: age difference between oldest the youngest
Solution:
Let age of Lariba be x years
As ratios of ages of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5,
Age of Esinam = [tex]\frac{3}{5}x[/tex] years
As ratio of ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5,
Age of Kissi = [tex](\frac{3}{5}) (\frac{3}{5}x)=\frac{9}{25}x[/tex] years
Sum of the ages of all 3 = 147 years
[tex]x+\frac{3}{5}x+\frac{9}{25}x=147\\ \frac{25x+15x+9x}{25}=147\\ x=\frac{147(25)}{49}=75[/tex]
Age of Lariba = x = 75 years
Age of Esinam = [tex]\frac{3}{5}(75)=45\,\,years[/tex]
Age of Kissi = [tex]\frac{9}{25}(75)=27\,\,years[/tex]
So,
Age difference between oldest the youngest = 75 - 27 = 48 years
Determine whether the geometric series 192 + 48 + 12 + ... converges or diverges, and identify the sum if it exists.
A.) Converges: 768
B.) Diverges
C.) Converges; 64
D.) Converges; 256
Answer:
D.) Converges; 256
Step-by-step explanation:
x0= 192
x1 = 48 = 192/4
x2 = 12 = 192/(4 x 4)
Therefore, this series can be written as:
[tex]x_n = \frac{192}{4^n}[/tex]
Applying limits at infinity:
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n= \lim_{n \to \infty} (\frac{192}{4^n}) = \frac{192}{\infty}=0[/tex]
Since the terms of the series tend to zero, we can affirm that the series converges.
The sum of an infinite converging series is:
[tex]S=\frac{x_0}{1-r} \\S=\frac{192}{1-\frac{1}{4} }\\S=256[/tex]
Thus, the answer is D.) Converges; 256
Please answer this correctly
Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
The total is 20 friends. This means that we need to make each frequency into a fraction, then simplify to percentage.
1. 10/20 = 50%
2. 3/20 15%
3. 2/20 = 10%
4. 5/20 = 25%
Hope this helps! (Please consider giving brainliest)
Answer:
Bus: 50%
Walk: 15%
Bike: 10%
Car: 25%
Step-by-step explanation:
The total amount of friends is 20.
10 out of 20 is equal to 1/2, which is equal to 50%.
3 out of 20 is equal to 15%.
2 out of 20 is equal to 10%.
And 5 out of 20 is equal to 1/4, which is equal to 25%.
Please mark Brainliest if correct
Hey what’s the correct answer for this?
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Well first find the proportion of the sector of the major Arc(shaded area) and then Multiply by area of the circle πr²
Simplify the expression. Write the answer using scientific notation. (7 × 105)2 a. 4.9 × 1010 b. 4.9 × 1011 c. 4.9 × 109 d. 49 × 1010
Answer:
b. 4.9 × 1011
Step-by-step explanation:
Using scientific notation is similar to expressing in standard form. Given that (7 × 105)2
We open the parenthesis. This may first be expressed as
7² × 10⁽⁵⁾²
Then expand,
= 49 × 10¹⁰
To put in scientific notation, 49 = 4.9 × 10
Hence the expression becomes
= 4.9 × 10 × 10¹⁰
Using the laws of indices
= 4.9 × 10¹¹ in scientific notation
Answer:
4.9 × 1011
Step-by-step explanation:
I did it in grandpoint
Please help! I don’t get what I’m supposed to put in those boxes
The volume of any cylinder is
V = pi*r^2*h
where r is the radius and h is the height. We are keeping r = 2 the same the entire time, as the first part of the instructions indicate. In contrast, h is allowed to vary or change based on the values shown in the table.
If h = 1, then,
V = pi*r^2*h
V = pi*2^2*1
V = pi*4
V = 4pi
So you'll write "4pi", without quotes of course, in the V column next to h = 1. This first row shows a height of 1 leads to a volume of 4pi.
-------------
Then if h = 2, we have,
V = pi*r^2*h
V = pi*2^2*2
V = pi*8
V = 8pi ... this is written in the second box
and finally if h = 3, we would say,
V = pi*r^2*h
V = pi*2^2*3
V = pi*12
V = 12pi .... and this is placed in the third box
---------------
The values of V we got were: 4pi, 8pi, 12pi
This is for h = 1,2 and 3 respectively in that order.
The sequence 4,8,12 is linear because we are adding 4 each time. More specifically, it fits the equation y = 4x where x = 1,2,3. Think of y = 4x as y = 4x+0 and that fits the slope intercept form y = mx+b.
List the steps taken to find the area of a triangle. Find the area of the
criangle.
10 in
17 in
Answer:
base x height / 2
I'm guessing 10 and 17 are the base and height
10 x 17 = 170
170 / 2 = 85
85 is the area
Hope this helps
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]\Huge\boxed{85}[/tex]
To find the area of a triangle, we can use the formula: [tex]A=\frac{h_bb}{2}[/tex]
Now, we know the formula, let's do the math.
The base is 10 and the height is 17, so according to the formula, multiply the Base × Height then divide by 2.
10 times 17 is 170. Remember to divide it by 2.
170 divided by 2 is 85.
Hence, your answer is 85 in.
Simplify: 5y + 2p – 4y – 6P
Answer:
[tex]y-4p[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Add/subtract like terms.
[tex]5y+2p-4y-6p\\5y-4y+2p-6p\\y-4p[/tex]
The average math SAT score is 511 with a standard deviation of 119. A particular high school claims that its students have unusually high math SAT scores. A random sample of 55 students from this school was selected, and the mean math SAT score was 528. Is the high school justified in its claim? Explain. ▼ No Yes , because the z-score ( nothing) is ▼ unusual not unusual since it ▼ does not lie lies within the range of a usual event, namely within ▼ 1 standard deviation 2 standard deviations 3 standard deviations of the mean of the sample means. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Answer:
No, because the z-score of Z = 1.06 is not unusual since it does not lie within the range of a usual event, namely within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the sample means.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.
Normal probability distribution
When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.
In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
Central Limit Theorem
The Central Limit Theorem estabilishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].
For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.
Unusual
If X is more than two standard deviations from the mean, x is considered unusual.
In this question:
[tex]\mu = 511, \sigma = 119, n = 55, s = \frac{119}{\sqrt{55}} = 16.046[/tex]
A random sample of 55 students from this school was selected, and the mean math SAT score was 528. Is the high school justified in its claim?
If Z is equal or greater than 2, the claim is justified.
Lets find Z.
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
By the Central Limit Theorem
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{528 - 511}{16.046}[/tex]
[tex]Z = 1.06[/tex]
1.06 < 2, so 528 is not unusually high.
The answer is:
No, because the z-score of Z = 1.06 is not unusual since it does not lie within the range of a usual event, namely within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the sample means.
The statement that could be made regarding the high school about the justification of its claim would be:
- No, because the z-score of Z = 1.06 is not unusual since it does not lie within the range of a usual event, namely within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the sample means.
Given that,
μ = 511
σ = 119
Sample(n) = 55
and
s = [tex]119/\sqrt{55}[/tex]
[tex]= 16.046[/tex]
As we know,
The claim of the high school could be valid and justified only when
[tex]Z > 2[/tex]
To find,
The value of Z
So,
[tex]Z = (X -[/tex] μ )/σ
by putting the values using Central Limit Theorem,
[tex]Z = (528 - 511)/16.046[/tex]
∵ [tex]Z = 1.06[/tex]
Since [tex]Z < 2[/tex], the claim is not justified.
Learn more about "Standard Deviation" here:
brainly.com/question/12402189
Please help. I’ll mark you as brainliest if correct!!!!
Answer:
a= 0
b= [tex]-\frac{\sqrt{42} }{12}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
We can rewrite the expression to be:
[tex]\frac{i\sqrt{7} }{i^{2}\sqrt{24} }[/tex]
We then can cancel out the i and we get
[tex]\frac{\sqrt{7} }{\sqrt{24} i}[/tex]
Can be rewritten as
[tex]\frac{\sqrt{7} }{2\sqrt{6} i}[/tex]
We then rationalize and get
[tex]-\frac{\sqrt{42} }{12} i[/tex]
Chocolate chip cookies have a distribution that is approximately normal with a mean of 23.1 chocolate chips per cookie and a standard deviation of 2.9 chocolate chips per cookie. Find Upper P 10 and Upper P 90. How might those values be helpful to the producer of the chocolate chip cookies?
Answer:
[tex]z=-1.28<\frac{a-23.1}{2.9}[/tex]
And if we solve for a we got
[tex]a=23.1 -1.28*2.9=19.388[/tex]
And for the 90 percentile we can do this:
[tex]z=1.28<\frac{a-23.1}{2.9}[/tex]
And if we solve for a we got
[tex]a=23.1 +1.28*2.9=26.812[/tex]
The P10 would be 19.388 and the P90 26.812
Step-by-step explanation:
Let X the random variable that represent the chocolate chip cookies of a population, and for this case we know the distribution for X is given by:
[tex]X \sim N(23.1,2.9)[/tex]
Where [tex]\mu=23.1[/tex] and [tex]\sigma=2.9[/tex]
For this part we want to find a value a, such that we satisfy this condition:
[tex]P(X>a)=0.90[/tex] (a)
[tex]P(X<a)=0.10[/tex] (b)
We can find a z score value who that satisfy the condition with 0.10 of the area on the left and 0.90 of the area on the right it's z=-1.28.
Using this value we can do this:
[tex]P(X<a)=P(\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}<\frac{a-\mu}{\sigma})=0.10[/tex]
[tex]P(z<\frac{a-\mu}{\sigma})=0.10[/tex]
And we can solve for the value of interest
[tex]z=-1.28<\frac{a-23.1}{2.9}[/tex]
And if we solve for a we got
[tex]a=23.1 -1.28*2.9=19.388[/tex]
And for the 90 percentile we can do this:
[tex]z=1.28<\frac{a-23.1}{2.9}[/tex]
And if we solve for a we got
[tex]a=23.1 +1.28*2.9=26.812[/tex]
The P10 would be 19.388 and the P90 26.812
Adam drew a line that was 6 4/10 inches long. If he drew a second line that was 2 2/3
inches longer, what is the length of the second line? Answer as a mixed number.
Answer:
The length of the second line is [tex]9\frac{1}{15}[/tex] inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Length of first line = [tex]6\frac{4}{10}[/tex] inches
Length of second line = [tex]2\frac{2}{3}[/tex] inches longer
Required
Length of second line.
Let the length of the second line be represented by x.
From the question, x is [tex]2\frac{2}{3}[/tex] inches longer than the first line;
This implies that:
[tex]x = 2\frac{2}{3} + 6\frac{4}{10}[/tex]
Convert both fractions to improper fractions
[tex]x = \frac{8}{3} + \frac{64}{10}[/tex]
Take LCM
[tex]x = \frac{80 + 192}{30}[/tex]
[tex]x = \frac{272}{30}[/tex]
Convert to mixed fraction
[tex]x = 9\frac{2}{30}[/tex]
Reduce fraction to lowest term
[tex]x = 9\frac{1}{15}[/tex]
Hence, the length of the second line is [tex]9\frac{1}{15}[/tex] inches
PLEASE HELP IM STUCK ON A PROBLEM....
Answer:
Number line A.
Step-by-step explanation:
|-5x| - 11 = -1
Add 11 to both sides.
|-5x| = 10
-5x = 10 or -5x = -10
x = -2 or x = 2
Answer: Number line A.
The drama club is selling candles for a fundraiser. They spend $100 on the candles and sell them for $4.50 each. How many candles must they sell to make more than $125 profit?
Let x represent the number of candles sold. Which inequality can you use to find x?
So I try to help
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't no sorrry
Answer:
the first one!!
Step-by-step explanation:
Type answer as integer proper fraction or mixed number
Answer:
[tex]9\dfrac{5}{6}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]5\dfrac{1}{6}+4\dfrac{2}{3}=\\\\5\dfrac{1}{6}+4\dfrac{4}{6}=\\\\9\dfrac{5}{6}[/tex]
Hope this helps!
Griffin’s General Store is having a 30% off sale on fans. Robert paid $25 for a fan. What is the original price of the fan?
Answer:
The original price of the fan is $35.71
Step-by-step explanation:
Since Griffin’s General Store is having a 30% off sale on fans, it simply means that fans are paying for (100%-30%)= 70%.
Let the original price be x;
Therefore, 70% of x equal to $25;
[tex]\frac{70}{100}x=25[/tex]
70/100x = 25
0.7x = 25
[tex]x = \frac{25}{0.7}[/tex]
x = 35. 71
Hence, The original price of the fan is $35.71
Answer:
$35.71
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement indicates that Robert paid $25 for a fan and that it had a 30% discount. To be able to determine the original price, you have to divide the the price with the discount by the result of 1 minus the discount.
Original price= 25/(1-0.3)
Original price= 25/0.7
Original price= 35.71
According to this, the answer is that the original price of the fan is $35.71.
Identify the exponential function for this graph. (Be sure to look at the scales
on the x- and y-axes.)
The required exponential function will be F(x)= [tex]4(0.5)^{x}[/tex]
Hence, Option A is the correct.
What is function?A relation between a collection of inputs and outputs is known as a function. A function is, to put it simply, a relationship between inputs in which each input is connected to precisely one output.
From the assumption graph as shown in attached figure, we can determine that when x = 0 then y = 4.
Also, we can closely observe that the graph represents decay
exponential function.
The reason is that when the value of x increases, the graph of the particular function decreases.
But, the rate of decay must be less than 1 for decay exponential function because if it is greater than 1, then it would represent the exponential growth function.
Hence, the option B and D should be completely ruled out as these values represent the exponential growth.
And from graph, it is clear that when x = 0 then y = 4
The exponential function will be F(x)= [tex]4(0.5)^{x}[/tex]
To learn more about function visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8892191
#SPJ7
A city has 5 new houses for every 7 old houses. If there are 45 new houses in the city, how many old houses are there?
Answer:
63
Step-by-step explanation:
Make a ratio:
5 : 7 = 45 : x
x = 63
What is the range of the function in the table
X Y
1 2
2 4
3 3
4 2
A) (1,2,3,4)
B) (1,2) (2,4) (3,3) (4,2)
C) (1,2)
D) (2,3,4)
Answer:
D. (2, 3, 4)
Step-by-step explanation:
The range is the y values. The y values, in numerical order, range from 2 to 4. The 2s do not need to be repeated.
What expression is equivalent to 6•6•6•6•6
Answer:
6^5
Step-by-step explanation:
6 multiplied with itself 5 times is equal to 6^5
Write the equation 2x - 3y = 6 in slope-intercept form.
Answer:
[tex] y = \frac{ 2}{ 3} x - 2[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]2x - 3y = 6 \\ - 3y = - 2x + 6 \\ \\ y = \frac{ - 2}{ - 3} x + \frac{6}{ - 3} \\ \\ \huge \purple{ \boxed{ y = \frac{ 2}{ 3} x - 2}} \\ this \: is \: in \: the \: slope - intercept \: form.[/tex]
Answer:
y = 2/ 3 x − 2
Step-by-step explanation:
slope intercept is y=mx+b
A.13.4 feet
B.13.1 feet
C.18 feet
D.10.4 feet
Answer:
13.4 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
use physagorean law
√12²+6²=cable
=13.4 feet
One day Pat Unger worked for a total of 8
hours. She worked 3 hours more in the after-
noon than she worked in the morning. How
long did she work in the afternoon?
Answer:
5.5 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the no. of hours worked in morning by Pat = x hours
given that "She worked 3 hours more in the after-
noon than she worked in the morning"
No. of hours worked in Afternoon by Pat = x + 3 hours
Total hours worked in the day = x + x+3 = 2x +3 hours (1)
It is given that Pat worked for 8 hours that day (2)
thus, using 1 and 2 we have
2x +3 = 8
=>2x = 8 - 3 = 5
=> x = 5/2 = 2.5
no. of hours worked in morning by Pat = x hours = 2.5 hours
No. of hours worked in Afternoon by Pat = x + 3 hours = 2.5 + 3 hours
No. of hours worked in Afternoon by Pat = 5.5 hours --- Answer.
The following data summarizes results from 1000 pre-employment drug screening tests. If one of the test subjects is randomly selected, find the probability that the subject had a positive test result or a negative test result.
Positive Test Result Negative Test Result
Subject Uses Drugs 76 6
Subject Is Not a Drug User 95 823
P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result)= simplify your answer.
Answer:
P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = 1
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
The table above
Required
P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result)
This is calculated as follows;
P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) =
P (subject had a positive test result) + P (subject had a negative test result)
Calculating P (subject had a positive test result)
This can be calculated by number of subjects with positive results divided by 1000
Only data from the column of subjects with positive results will be considered.
Number of Subjects = Subjects that uses drugs + Subjects that do not use drugs
Number of subjects = 76 + 95
Number of Subjects = 171
P (Subject had a positive test Result) = 171/1000
Calculating P (subject had a negative test result)
This can be calculated by number of subjects with negative results divided by 1000
Only data from the column of subjects with negative results will be considered.
Number of Subjects = Subjects that uses drugs + Subjects that do not use drugs
Number of subjects = 6 + 823
Number of Subjects = 829
P (Subject had a negative test Result) = 829/1000
Hence, P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) =
P (subject had a positive test result) + P (subject had a negative test result) = 171/1000 + 829/1000
P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = (171 + 829)/1000
P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = 1000/1000
P (subject had a positive test result or a negative test result) = 1
If the mean of 5 positive integers is 15, what is the maximum possible difference between the largest and the smallest of these 5 numbers?
Answer:
The maximum possible difference between the largest and the smallest of these 5 numbers is 65( if numbers aren't repeated )
PLEASE HELP. if f(x)=x and g(x)=2, what is (f*g)(x)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
hey
(f*g)(x) = f(g(x)) = f(2) = 2
second answer is correct
thanks
ASAP! GIVING BRAINLIEST! Please read the question THEN answer CORRECTLY! NO guessing. I say no guessing because people usually guess on my questions.
Answer: f(x)=2-x^2
Step-by-step explanation:
The quadratic equation is
y=ax^2+bx+c
and c is equal to the y-intercept.
in the twi graphs shown both have the same shape but different y-intervepts.
c(the y-intercept) in the first graph is 5 and in the second graph(F) is 2.
On the graphing calculator it says that f(x)=2-x^2 is the correct answer therefore it is correct.
please help you will get 20 points and explain your answer please
Answer:
Top prism = 262 in.² Bottom prism = 478 in.²
Step-by-step explanation:
top prism:
front + back: 5 x 3 = 15
sides: 19 x 4 x 2 = 152
bottom: 19 x 5 = 95
15 + 152 + 95 = 262
bottom prism:
front + back: 5 x 6 x 2 = 60
sides: 19 x 6 x 2 = 228
top + bottom: 19 x 5 x 2 = 190
60 + 228 + 190 = 478
Answer:
Top prism = 262 in.² Bottom prism = 478 in.²
Step-by-step explanation:
top prism:
front + back: 5 x 3 = 15
sides: 19 x 4 x 2 = 152
bottom: 19 x 5 = 95
15 + 152 + 95 = 262
bottom prism:
front + back: 5 x 6 x 2 = 60
sides: 19 x 6 x 2 = 228
top + bottom: 19 x 5 x 2 = 190
60 + 228 + 190 = 478
A sample of 899 Americans provides enough evidence to conclude that marketing campaign was effective. Provide a statement that should be put out by the marketing department. A. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean consumption of popcorn has risen. B. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean consumption of popcorn has risen. C. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean consumption of popcorn has stayed the same. D. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean consumption of popcorn has stayed the same.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option A.
Step-by-step explanation:
Marketing Analyst seems to be responsible for information and evaluation that directs its marketing team and directs its marketing approach by defining the target clients as well as the competitiveness of the product.A survey of 899 American citizens requires appropriate evidence to demonstrate that perhaps the marketing strategy is working even though there was not considerable evidence to suggest that even the total demand for popcorn had increased.Other given choices are not related to the given circumstances. So that option A seems to be the appropriate choice.