Answer:
Amount received per brother based on number of children plus debt is given as
Roberto, S/ 55,333.33
Luis, S/ 46,000
Armando, S/ 74,666.67
Step-by-step explanation:
English Translation
A prestigious businessman decides to distribute his inheritance of S / 176,000 among his three brothers Roberto, Luis and Armando, DP to the number of his children and IP to the amount of his debts. How much corresponds to each brother?
Roberto: No of children 4, Amount of debts (S /): 2 000
Luis: No. of children 3, Amount of debts (S /): 6,000
Armando: No of children 5, Amount of debts (S /): 8,000
Solution
The man shares the inheritance according to the number of children per person and according to each brother's debts.
Assuming the debts are first settled,
The total debts = 2000 + 6000 + 8000 = S/ 16,000
We assume that each brother receives the respective debt amounts first, then the remaining cash is divided amongst the 3 brothers according to the number of their children.
Total amount available = S/ 176,000
total debt = S/ 16,000
Amount available less debts = 176,000 - 16,000 = S/ 160,000
There are 4, 3 and 5 children respectively for the 3 brothers.
Total number of children = 4+3+5 = 12.
Amount corresponding based on a per child basis =( S/ 160,000/12) = S/ 13,333.33
Meaning that each brother receives the following amount based on their children's sake
Roberto, 4 × S/ 13,333 = S/ 53,333.33
Luis, 3 × S/ 13,333.33 = S/ 40,000
Armando, 5 × S/ 13,333 = S/ 66,666.67
Total amount each brother then receives when the amount received due to debts are added
Roberto, 53,333.33 + 2,000 = S/ 55,333.33
Luis, 40,000 + 6,000 = S/ 46,000
Armando, 66,666.67 + 8,000 = S/ 74,666.67
To check, 55,333.33 + 46,000 + 74,666.67 = 176,000 (total inheritance!)
Hope this Helps!!!
Queremos ver como se reparte una dada suma entre 3 hermanos, siendo que tenemos unas dadas restricciones, donde debemos trabajar con relaciones directamente proporcionales e inversamente proporcionales.
Veremos que:
Roberto recibe: $112,640
Luis recibe: $28,160
Armando recibe: $35,200
Sabemos que lo que se reparte es directamente proporcional al número de hijos de cada hermano, e inversamente proporcional a las deudas de cada hijo.
Entonces, definamos las variables:
R = lo que recibe Roberto.
L = Lo que recibe Luis
A = lo que recibe Armando.
Tendremos que:
R + L + A = $176,000
directamente proporcional significa: y = k*xInversamente proporcional significa: y = k/zEntonces como lo que recibe cada hermano es directamente proporcional al número de hijos (x) e inversamente proporcional a la deuda (z) lo que cada hermano recibe será:
R = k*4/2,000L = k*3/6,000A = k*5/8,000Entonces podemos escribir:
R + L + A = $176,000
k*4/2,000 + k*3/6,000 + k*5/8,000 = $176,000
k*(4/2,000 + 3/6,000 + 5/8,000) = $176,000
k*(0.003125) = $176,000
k = $176,000/(0.003125) = $56,320,000
Ahora que conocemos el valor de k, podemos calcular lo que cada hermano recibe:
R = $56,320,000*(4/2,000) = $112,640
L = $56,320,000*(3/6,000) = $28,160
A = $56,320,000*(5/8,000) = $35,200
Si quieres aprender más, puedes leer:
https://brainly.com/question/18365407
Please help. I keep getting this problem wrong . I need help please . I’ll mark you as brainliest if correct . Only answer if you know. Thank you
Answer:
The real number 'a' = 32
The real number 'b' = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Product of a number of a number and its conjugate = a + bi
The number is = -4 + 4i
Conjugate of this number is = -4 - 4i
Product of the number and it's conjugate
= (-4 + 4i)(-4 - 4i)
= -4(-4 - 4i) + 4i(-4 - 4i) [By distributive property]
= 16 + 16i - 16i - 16i²
= 16 - 16(-1)
= 16 + 16
= 32
a + bi = 32 + (0)i
By comparing both the sides,
a = 32
b = 0
1/x=1/2 / 4/5
Solve for x.
X =
Answer:
1/x = 1/2÷4/5
1/x=1/2 x 5/4
1/x=5/8
5x=8
x=1.6
what is the solution to this problem
x-17= -5
Hi
X-17 = -5
X = -5+17
X = 12
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm pretty sure that you have to add 17 on both sides to keep the final number, not negative.
So like:
x-17=-5
+17 +17
x-0=12
and because 0 is nothing really, x=12
What is the additive inverse of the complex number 9-4i?
Answer:
[tex] \frac{1}{9 - 4i} [/tex]
I'm not sure
Display the values of the function in two ways: (a) by sketching the surface zequals=f (x comma y )f(x,y) and (b) by drawing an assortment of level curves in the function's domain. Label each level curve with its function value.
Answer:
(1) f(x,y) = 1-|x|-|y|
(a) 3d figure attached
(b) 2d figure attached
(2) f(x,y) = 6-2x-3y
(a) 3d figure attached
(b) 2d figure attached
Step-by-step explanation:
The Function is not given in the question. Lets solve this for 2 common function for the internet. Hopefully it can solves the given problem
(1) f(x,y) = 1-|x|-|y|
(2) f(x,y) = 6-2x-3y
All the figures are labelled to avoid confusion. (a) part of both functions have 3D sketches. (b) part of both functions have 2d sketches
round 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures
I will give brainliest
Answer:
0.00420 is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
The definition of sig figs is each of the digits of a number that are used to express it to the required degree of accuracy, starting from the first nonzero digit.
The rounding number of 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures is 0.0042
Here,
The number is 0.004198223.
We have to find, 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures.
What is Rounding number?
Rounding means making a number simpler but keeping its value close to what it was.
Here,
The number is 0.004198223.
To find 3 significant figures,
We round a number to three significant figures in the same way that we would round to three decimal places.
Then, We count from the first non-zero digit for three digits. We then round the last digit.
Here, the digit is 9 then it will be round.
We get, the number is;
0.0042
We fill in any remaining places to the right of the decimal point with zeros.
So, The rounding number of 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures is 0.00420
Learn more about the rounding number visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4896544
#SPJ2
Help meee please 15 points!!
Answer:
B.
Step-by-step explanation:
B.
- 9 ≤ - 3x - 6 ≤ 6
1 part.
- 9 +6 ≤ - 3x - 6 +6
- 3/(- 3) ≤ - 3x/(- 3)
1 ≥ x
2d part
- 3x - 6 +6≤ 6 + 6
- 3x ≤ 12
- 3x/(-3) ≥ 12/(-3)
x ≥ - 4
x ≥ - 4 and x≤ 1
Some scientists believe there is a limit to how long humans can live. One supporting argument is that during the past century, life expectancy from age 65 has increased more slowly than life expectancy from birth, so eventually these two will be equal, at which point, according to these scientists, life expectancy should increase no further. In 1900, life expectancy at birth was 45 years, and life expectancy at age 65 was 75 yr. In 2010, these figures had risen to 78.7 and 84.5, respectively. In both cases, the increase in life expectancy has been linear. Using these assumptions and the data given, find the maximum life expectancy for humans.
Answer:
The maximum life expectancy for humans is approximately 87 years.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to calculate the point in which both linear functions (Life expectancy from birth and Life expectancy from age 65) intersect, as this is the point in which is estimated to be the maximum life expectancy for humans.
NOTE: to simplify we will consider t=0 to the year 1900, so year 2010 becames t=(2010-1900)=110.
The linear function for Life expectancy from birth can be calculated as:
[tex]t=0\rightarrow y=45\\\\t=110\rightarrow y=78.7\\\\\\m=\dfrac{\Delta y}{\Delta t}=\dfrac{78.7-45}{110-0}=\dfrac{33.7}{110}=0.3064\\\\\\y=0.3064t+45[/tex]
The linear function for Life expectancy from age 65 can be calculated as:
[tex]t=0\rightarrow y=75\\\\t=110\rightarrow y=84.5\\\\\\m=\dfrac{\Delta y}{\Delta t}=\dfrac{84.5-75}{110-0}=\dfrac{9.5}{110}=0.0864\\\\\\y=0.0864t+75[/tex]
Then, the time t where both functions intersect is:
[tex]0.3064t+45=0.0864t+75\\\\(0.3064-0.0864)t=75-45\\\\0.22t=30\\\\t=30/0.22\\\\t=136.36[/tex]
The time t=136.36 corresponds to the year 1900+136.36=2036.36.
Now, we can calculate with any of both functions the maximum life expectancy:
[tex]y=0.0864(136.36)+75\\\\y=11.78+75\\\\y=86.78\approx87[/tex]
The maximum life expectancy for humans is approximately 87 years.
What is the area of a rectangle with a base of 23 feet and a height of 6 feet
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Area of rectangle = l × b
= 23 × 6
= 138 feet
hope this helps
plz mark it as brainliest!!!!!!!
Can someone please help me with this question please
Answer:
Read below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Questions are underlined
Answers are bolded
Which of the following statements is true?
If two polygons are similar then the corresponding sides are proportional and the corresponding angles are proportional.
If two polygons are similar, then the corresponding sides are proportional and the corresponding angles are congruent.
If two polygons are similar, then the corresponding sides are congruent and the corresponding angles are proportional.
None of the choices are correct.
Which of the following sides are corresponding if ΔABC is similar to ΔMNL?
AC and ML, BC and NL, AB and MN is the correct answer but the answer choices are:
AB and MN, BC and NL, AC and ML
AC and MN, BC and NL, AB and ML
AB and ML, BC and NL, AC and MN
None of the choices are correct.
Find the SURFACE AREA of this composite solid.
FINDING THE SURFACE AREA OF A COMPOSITE SOLID
About "Finding the surface area of a composite solid"
Finding the surface area of a composite solid :
A composite solid is made up of two or more solid figures.
To find the surface area of a composite solid, find the surface area of each figure. Subtract any area not on the surface.
Finding the surface area of a composite solid - Examples
Example 1 :
Daniel built the birdhouse shown below. What was the surface area of the birdhouse before the hole was drilled ?
Solution :
Step 1 :
Identify the important information.
• The top is a triangular prism with h = 24 cm. The base is a triangle with height 8 cm and base 30 cm.
• The bottom is a rectangular prism with h = 18 cm. The base is a 30 cm by 24 cm rectangle.
• One face of each prism is not on the surface of the figure.
Step 2 :
Find the surface area of each prism.
Add the areas. Subtract the areas of the parts not on the surface.
Step 3 :
Find the area of the triangular prism.
Perimeter = 17 + 17 + 30 = 64 cm
Base area = (1/2)(30)(8) = 120 sq.cm
Surface area = Ph + 2B
Surface area = 64(24) + 2(120)
Surface area = 1,776 sq.cm
Step 4 :
Find the area of the rectangular prism.
Perimeter = 2(30) + 2(24) = 108 cm
Base area = 30(24) = 720 sq.cm
Surface area = Ph + 2B
Surface area = 108(18) + 2(720)
Surface area = 3,384 sq.cm
Step 5 :
Add. Then subtract twice the areas of the parts not on the surface.
Surface area = 1,776 + 3,384 - 2(720) = 3,720 sq.cm
The surface area before the hole was drilled was 3,720 sq.cm.
The surface area before the hole was drilled was; 3,720 sq.cm.
What is composite solid?A composite solid is made up of two or more solid figures.
To determine the surface area of a composite solid, find the surface area of each figure. Subtract any area not on the surface.
Given that the top is a triangular prism with h = 24 cm. The base is a triangle with height 8 cm and base 30 cm.
The bottom is a rectangular prism with h = 18 cm.
The base is a 30 cm x 24 cm rectangle.
One face of each prism is not on the surface of the figure.
Then the surface area of each prism.
Add the areas. Subtract the areas of the parts not on the surface.
The area of the triangular prism.
Perimeter = 17 + 17 + 30 = 64 cm
Base area = (1/2)(30)(8) = 120 sq.cm
Surface area = Ph + 2B
Surface area = 64(24) + 2(120)
Surface area = 1,776 sq.cm
Now the area of the rectangular prism.
Perimeter = 2(30) + 2(24) = 108 cm
Base area = 30(24) = 720 sq.cm
Surface area = Ph + 2B
Surface area = 108(18) + 2(720)
Surface area = 3,384 sq.cm
Now,
Surface area = 1,776 + 3,384 - 2(720) = 3,720 sq.cm
Learn more about the area;
https://brainly.com/question/1658516
#SPJ2
Lesson 10 congruent triangles unit test
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Wheres the question??
What’s the correct answer for this?
Answer:
57°
Step-by-step explanation:
According to theorem, "any two angles in the same segment of the circle are equal"
So,
m<BED = 57°
Customer arrivals at a bank are random and independent; the probability of an arrival in any one-minute period is the same as the probability of an arrival in any other one-minute period. Answer the following questions, assuming a mean arrival rate of three customers per minute.
Required:
a. What is the probability of exactly three arrivals in one-minute period?
b. What is the probability of at least three arrivals in a one-minute period?
Answer:
a)0.2240
b)0.5768
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
µ=3
Poison probability is given by :
[tex]f_k=\frac{\mu^ke^-^\mu}{k!}[/tex]
a) Evaluating at k=3
[tex]f(3)=\frac{3^3e^-^3}{3!} \approx 0.2240[/tex]
b)Evaluating at k=0,1,2:
[tex]f(0)=\frac{3^0e^-^3}{0!} \approx 0.0498[/tex]
[tex]f(1)=\frac{3^1e^-^3}{1!} \approx 0.1494[/tex]
[tex]f(2)=\frac{3^2e^-^3}{2!} \approx 0.2240[/tex]
Use complement rule:
P(x≥3)= 1 - f(0) - f(1) - f(2)= 1- 0.0498 - 0.1494 - 0.2240 =0.5768
Triangle JKL was dilated using the rule D Subscript M, one-third. The image, triangle J'K'L', is the result of the dilation. Point M is the center of dilation. Triangle J K L is dilated to form smaller triangle J prime K prime L prime. The length of M L prime is 2.5. What is L'L? 5 units 7.5 units 10 units 12.5 units
Answer: the answer is A 5 units
The length of L'L in the dilated figure is 5 units.
What is transformation?Transformation is the movement of a point from its initial location to a new location. Types of transformation are rotation, translation, reflection and dilation.
Dilation is the increase or decrease in size of a figure.
Triangle JKL was dilated by 1/3 with M as the center of dilation to form J'K'L'.
Given that ML' = 2.5 units, hence:
L'L = (2.5 * 3) - 2.5 = 5 units
The length of L'L in the dilated figure is 5 units.
Find out more on transformation at: https://brainly.com/question/1620969
Which expression is equivalent to 4+2(1+3x)
Answer:
I'm glad you asked!
Step-by-step explanation:
OK,let's simplify the number for a equivalent expression.
[tex]4+2(1+3x)[/tex]
Distribute:
[tex]=4+(2)(1)+(2)(3x)[/tex]
[tex]= 4+2+6x[/tex]
Combine Like Terms:
[tex]=4+2+6x[/tex]
[tex]=(6x)+(4+2)[/tex]
[tex]=6x+6[/tex]
The Final Answer is : [tex]6x+6[/tex]
The expression that is equivalent to 4+2(1+3x) is 6x+6.
What is an Algebraic expression?Mathematical expressions that are made up of constants, variables, and coefficients that are combined using algebraic operations such as multiplication, addition, subtraction, and division are called Algebraic expressions.
How do simplify the algebraic expression?Given, 4+2(1+3x)
Firstly distribute 2(1+3x) to get 2+6x then,
4+2(1+3x)
=4+2+6x
=6x+6
Thus, 4+2(1+3x)=6x+6
For more simplification visit- https://brainly.com/question/953809?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ2
A square has an area of 349.69m2.
Work out the perimeter of the square.
Answer:
[tex]74.8m[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]A=a^2\\P=4a\\P=4\sqrt{A} \\=4*\sqrt{349.69} \\=74.8m[/tex]
A standard 52-card deck has four 13-card suits: diamonds, hearts, clubs, and spades. The diamonds and hearts are red, and the clubs and spades are black. Each 13-card suit contains cards numbered from 2 to 10, a jack, a queen, a king, and an ace. An experiment consists of drawing 1 card from the standard deck. Find the probability of drawing a black jack of diamonds.
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
In a suit of 52 cards
The Red Cards are: diamonds and heartsThe Black cards are: clubs and spadesThe experiment consists of drawing 1 card from the standard deck.
Since diamonds are red, there is no black jack of diamonds.
Therefore:
P(drawing a black jack of diamonds)
[tex]=\dfrac{0}{52}\\\\ =0[/tex]
Answers:
In photo below
Explanation:
I got it correct in my test :)
Solve the inequality 2(4x-3)>-3(3x)+5
Answer:
48x>+2
Step-by-step explanation:
Mr. Azu invested an amount at rate of 12% per annum and invested another amount, 580 ghana cedis more than the first at 14% . if Mr. Azu had total accumulated amount of 2,358.60, how much was his total investment?
Answer:
2082.12 was the total invested
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the amount invested at 14%. Then the amount invested at 12% was (x-580). The total accumulated amount was ...
112%(x -580) +114%(x) = 2358.60
2.26x -649.60 = 2358.60
2.26x = 3008.20 . . . add 649.60
x = 1331.06 . . . . . . divide by 2.26
x -580 = 751.06
The total invested was 1331.06 +751.06 = 2082.12 cedis.
__
Check
The investment at 12% was 751.06, so the accumulated amount of that investment was 751.06×1.12 = 841.19.
The investment at 14% was 1331.06, so the accumulated amount of that investment as 1331.06×1.14 = 1517.41.
The accumulated total amount was 841.19 +1517.41 = 2358.60.
A car company claims that its cars achieve an average gas mileage of at least 26 miles per gallon. A random sample of eight cars form this company have an average gas mileage of 25.5 miles per gallon and a standard deviation of 1 mile per gallon. At α=0.06, can the company’s claim be supported, assuming this is a normally distributed data set?
Answer:
[tex]t=\frac{25.5-26}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}}=-1.414[/tex]
The degrees of freedom are given by:
[tex]df=n-1=8-1=7[/tex]
The p value for this case is given by:
[tex]p_v =P(t_{(7)}<-1.414)=0.100[/tex]
Since the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.06 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly less than 25.5 and then the claim makes sense
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
[tex]\bar X=25.5[/tex] represent the sample mean
[tex]s=1[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation
[tex]n=8[/tex] sample size
[tex]\mu_o =26[/tex] represent the value to verify
[tex]\alpha=0.06[/tex] represent the significance level
t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value
Hypothesis to est
We want to test if the true mean is at least 26 mpg, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu \geq 25.5[/tex]
Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu < 25.5[/tex]
The statistic for this case is given by;
[tex]t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex] (1)
Replacing the info given we got:
[tex]t=\frac{25.5-26}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}}=-1.414[/tex]
The degrees of freedom are given by:
[tex]df=n-1=8-1=7[/tex]
The p value for this case is given by:
[tex]p_v =P(t_{(7)}<-1.414)=0.100[/tex]
Since the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.06 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly less than 25.5 and then the claim makes sense
What’s the correct answer for this question?
Answer:
B:
Step-by-step explanation:
Measure of ARC AFB is 180°
Why?
This is because AB is a diameter.
Which graph represents the solution set for
-X2 + 8x - 12 > 0?
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose that a large mixing tank initially holds 100 gallons of water in which 50 pounds of salt have been dissolved. Another brine solution is pumped into the tank at a rate of 3 gal/min, and when the solution is well stirred, it is then pumped out at a slower rate of 2 gal/min. If the concentration of the solution entering is 4 lb/gal, determine a differential equation (in lb/min) for the amount of salt A(t) (in lb) in the tank at time t > 0. (Use A for A(t).)
Answer:
dA/dt = 12 - 2A/(100 + t)
Step-by-step explanation:
The differential equation of this problem is;
dA/dt = R_in - R_out
Where;
R_in is the rate at which salt enters
R_out is the rate at which salt exits
R_in = (concentration of salt in inflow) × (input rate of brine)
We are given;
Concentration of salt in inflow = 4 lb/gal
Input rate of brine = 3 gal/min
Thus;
R_in = 4 × 3 = 12 lb/min
Due to the fact that solution is pumped out at a slower rate, thus it is accumulating at the rate of (3 - 2)gal/min = 1 gal/min
So, after t minutes, there will be (100 + t) gallons in the tank
Therefore;
R_out = (concentration of salt in outflow) × (output rate of brine)
R_out = [A(t)/(100 + t)]lb/gal × 2 gal/min
R_out = 2A(t)/(100 + t) lb/min
So, we substitute the values of R_in and R_out into the Differential equation to get;
dA/dt = 12 - 2A(t)/(100 + t)
Since we are to use A foe A(t), thus the Differential equation is now;
dA/dt = 12 - 2A/(100 + t)
Find the constant of variation for the relation and use it to write and solve the equation.
if y varies directly as x and as the square of z, and y=25/9 when x=5 and z=1, find y when x=1 and z=4
Answer:
When x = 1 and z = 4, [tex]y=\frac{80}{9}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
The variation described in the problem can be written using a constant of proportionality "b" as:
[tex]y=b\,\,x\,\,z^2[/tex]
The other piece of information is that when x = 5 and z = 1, then y gives 25/9. So we use this info to find the constant "b":
[tex]y=b\,\,x\,\,z^2\\\frac{25}{9} =b\,\,(5)\,\,(1)^2\\\frac{25}{9} =b\,\,(5)\\b=\frac{5}{9}[/tex]
Knowing this constant, we can find the value of y when x=1 and z=4 as:
[tex]y=b\,\,x\,\,z^2\\y=\frac{5}{9} \,\,x\,\,z^2\\y=\frac{5}{9} \,\,(1)\,\,(4)^2\\y=\frac{5*16}{9}\\y=\frac{80}{9}[/tex]
The arrival of customers at a service desk follows a Poisson distribution. If they arrive at a rate of two every five minutes, what is the probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period?
Answer:
13.53% probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period
Step-by-step explanation:
In a Poisson distribution, the probability that X represents the number of successes of a random variable is given by the following formula:
[tex]P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\mu}*\mu^{x}}{(x)!}[/tex]
In which
x is the number of sucesses
e = 2.71828 is the Euler number
[tex]\mu[/tex] is the mean in the given time interval.
They arrive at a rate of two every five minutes
This means that [tex]\mu = 2[/tex]
What is the probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period?
This is P(X = 0).
[tex]P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\mu}*\mu^{x}}{(x)!}[/tex]
[tex]P(X = 0) = \frac{e^{-2}*2^{0}}{(0)!} = 0.1353[/tex]
13.53% probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period
find the arc length of the particle circle
Answer:
Is there a picture or graph or..
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
arc length = (radians * radians) . 90° is π/2 radians. Arc length is (π/2×4). So the answer is 2π.
Lily paints 3 trees for a wall mural. The middle tree is 2 1/2 ft tall. The tree on the left is 3/4 as tall as the middle tree. The tree on the right is 1 3/4 times as tall as the middle tree. How tall is each tree?
Answer:
middle is 2.5 ft
right is 4375 ft
left is 1875 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
find five rational numbers between ? explain please
Answer:
1.5, 6, 24.7, 384, 404.4, 1,980Step-by-step explanation:
Rational numbers are the result of dividing two integers. Intergers cannot be fractions. So 1.5 is rational but 3/2 is not.
Five rational numbers: 1.5, 6, 24.7, 384, 404.4, 1,980
I'm always happy to help :)
1. Ryan budgets $35 a week for lunch for 5 days. What
is his average lunch expense each day?
Answer: $7
Step-by-step explanation:
35/ 5 = 7
Answer:
$7
Step-by-step explanation:
Bc/ 35/5=7