Answer:
D
Explanation:
Oklahomans had suffered a similar type of trauma just a few years earlier. was the primary reason why the 9/11 tragedy had unique relevance for Oklahomans.
What is the relevance?Countless noun Relevance to a circumstance or person refers to something's significance or importance in that scenario or to that person. The private lives of politicians have no bearing on their public personas.
Readers determine the relevance of information, as opposed to the author defining importance and cueing it through various internal textual characteristics.
Earlier. was the primary reason why the 9/11 tragedy had unique relevance for Oklahomans.
Therefore, Thus, option (D) is correct,
Learn more about relevance here:
https://brainly.com/question/13036889
#SPJ2
Please help ASAP
What is imperialism?
what economic Explanation of effect on colonized peoples
need asap
And I will mark your answer the brainiest if it correct
Answer:
The immense economic inequality we observe in the world today didn’t happen overnight, or even in the past century. It is the path-dependent outcome of a multitude of historical processes, one of the most important of which has been European colonialism. Retracing our steps 500 years, or back to the verge of this colonial project, we see little inequality and small differences between poor and rich countries (perhaps a factor of four). Now the differences are a factor of more than 40, if we compare the richest to the poorest countries in the world
Write an essay about the Mexican war 5 paragraphs
Answer:
The Mexican–American War, also known in the United States as the Mexican War and in Mexico as the Intervención Estadounidense en México, was an armed conflict between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848. It followed the 1845 U.S. annexation of Texas, which Mexico still considered Mexican territory since the government did not recognize the Velasco treaty signed by Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna when he was a prisoner of the Texian Army during the 1836 Texas Revolution. The Republic of Texas was de facto an independent country, but most of its citizens wished to be annexed by the United States. Domestic sectional politics in the U.S. were preventing annexation since Texas would have been a slave state, upsetting the balance of power between northern free states and southern slave states. In the 1844 United States presidential election, Democrat James K. Polk was elected on a platform of expanding U.S. territory in Oregon and Texas. Polk advocated expansion by either peaceful means or by armed force, with the 1845 annexation of Texas furthering that goal by peaceful means. For Mexico, this was a provocation, but Polk went further, sending U.S. Army troops to the area; he also sent a diplomatic mission to Mexico to try to negotiate the sale of territory. U.S. troops' presence was provocative and designed to lure Mexico into starting the conflict, putting the onus on Mexico and allowing Polk to argue to Congress that a declaration of war should be issued. Mexican forces attacked U.S. forces, and the United States Congress declared war.
Explanation:
Here you go, btw you should give more than 8 points ;/
Mexican War (1846–48).After weeks of fruitless diplomacy, the United States and the republic of Mexico declared war on each other in the spring of 1846. By the 1840s, many Americans held the view that the United States should reach from the Atlantic all the way to the Pacific Ocean. In 1844, Democrat James K. Polk of Tennessee ran for the presidency and won on a platform of expansionism, embracing the popular concept of “manifest destiny”—that God approved U.S. expansion throughout the continent. Polk opened diplomacy designed to redeem his campaign pledges to purchase California and other Mexican lands as well as to obtain the Oregon country from Britain. Considered in grand strategic terms, Polk intended to make the United States the undisputed national power on the North American continent and to obtain West Coast ports. The British agreed to an equitable treaty dividing Oregon, but no self‐respecting patriotic Mexican leader would be satisfied with any amount of money for California.
U.S. annexation of Texas sparked the war. The Texas Revolution of 1836 had won independence for the republic of Texas, but Mexico never officially recognized the loss of the province. Polk's predecessor, John Tyler, arranged the annexation of Texas into the United States in 1845 by a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress before Polk was sworn in. According to Mexico, the United States had torn away one of its provinces. The Mexican government rejected Polk's final offer of $35 million for California and other lands and dispatched military forces to the Rio Grande. It also rejected Texas and U.S. claims that the border extended south to the Rio Grande instead of the Nueces River.
On 23 April 1846, President Mariano Paredes announced that a state of “defensive” war existed between Mexico and the United States, in response to the violation of the Texas border by U.S. soldiers under Gen. Zachary Taylor, who marched under Polk's orders from Louisiana through Texas up to the Nueces River. On 25 April, Mexican and U.S. forces fought a skirmish between the Nueces and the Rio Grande. Eleven U.S. dragons were killed, five wounded and forty‐seven captured. It took several days for word of the skirmish to reach President Polk, who had previously decided on war even before Paredes's announcement. On 11 May, he asked Congress to acknowledge the state of war that Mexico had already announced, but did so with a resounding and controversial call: “American blood has been shed on American soil.” On 13 May, Congress strongly endorsed Polk's request, 174–14 in the House of Representatives and 40–2 in the Senate. Critics, mostly northern Whigs, condemned the president's action, asserting that he sought war to acquire more slave territory and denying that the disputed border area belonged to the United States.
Northern Mexico included two commercial centers, Santa Fe, New Mexico, and San Francisco, California. Lightly populated and distant from Mexico City, both provinces were difficult to defend. Polk met with his cabinet and formulated a remarkably ambitious strategy. He ordered U.S. soldiers to invade New Mexico, capture Santa Fe, then proceed to conquer California, where a naval squadron would assist them in securing the province. Meanwhile, General Taylor with less than 3,000 regulars would drive Mexican forces south of the Rio Grande, which the United States claimed as the international boundary. Polk assumed that if U.S. forces occupied the Rio Grande as well as key spots in New Mexico and California, Mexico would have no choice but to concede the fait accompli, and the United States would have won the war.
For their part, however, the Mexicans stood ready to fight, both for the defense of their territory and the future of their fledgling nation, which only twenty‐four years earlier had won its independence from Spain. Mexico possessed a tiny naval coast guard and on paper had a national army of more than 30,000 soldiers, over three times the U.S. Army's size at 8,500 officers and men. Numbers masked contrasts between the two armies, however. The Mexican Army was indifferently trained and unevenly equipped. Some units had enthusiastic officers, good weapons, and adequate supplies; others were deficient in all respects. Many Mexican officers held honorific commissions but knew little about military matters. The army had been involved with intrigues in the national capital, where commanders went in and out of favor with the political winds. Thus, the Mexican Army had more weaknesses than strengths.
The English Bill of Rights of 1689 differed from the Magna Carta in that it:
1. extended more rights to common English citizens
2. increased the powers of the English monarch
3. did not apply to the English colonists
4. granted religious freedom for English Catholics
The English Bill of Rights of 1689 differed from the Magna Carta in that it extended more rights to common English citizens.
What's the difference between the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights?The Magna Carta is known to be one that is made up of the ideas of limited government as well as common law, and it affected by constitutional ideas about limited government but The English Bill of Rights is known to be one that is made up of the ideas of consent of the governed as well as individual rights.
Therefore, The English Bill of Rights of 1689 differed from the Magna Carta in that it extended more rights to common English citizens.
Learn more about Magna Carta from
https://brainly.com/question/25378155
#SPJ1
Answer: 1
Explanation:
(02.05 LC
Which goal below is realistic, specific, and measurable? (6 points)
Do better in all classes as soon as possible
Try harder on all tests and quizzes
Raise all C's to a B or higher by the end of the semester
o Get better grades on all exams
Answer:
Raise all C's to a B or higher by the end of the semester
Explanation:
Answer:
Raise C's to B's (or higher) by the end of the year.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
How did Syrian rule differ from Persian rule for Jewish people?
Answer:For the Jewish people Syrian rule differed from Persian rule because the Syrians outlawed Judaism and the Persians encouraged free worship for the Jews.
Answer:The Syrians eventually outlawed Judaism, while the Persians encouraged free worship.
Explanation:
What played a part in U.S. economic growth in the 1950s?
OA. The use of radio and television advertising
OB. Desegregation of industrial plants
OC. Military spending for the Cold War
OD. The industrial power of the United States
Answer:
Its D. The industrial power of the united states
Explanation:
Ape.x
The industrial power of the United States: played a part in U.S. economic growth in the 1950s. Thus, option D is the correct option.
What played a part in US economic growth in the 1950s?The baby boom, the conclusion of World War II, and government policies that supported economic expansion all contributed to the 1950s and 1960s economic boom in the United States. Throughout the 1950s, the economy as a whole expanded by 37%, while the unemployment rate stayed low at 4.5%. The median American household had 30% more purchasing power by the decade's end than it had at its start.
Due in part to Eisenhower's attempts to balance the federal budget, there was little inflation. Veterans were able to finance college thanks to the GI Bill, which helped the workforce by producing a pool of highly educated workers. As technological and scientific advancements increased output, low-cost oil from American wells powered industry.
Learn more about US economic growth in the 1950s here:
https://brainly.com/question/1328468
#SPJ7
Which of the following established England as a constitutional monarchy?
Question 4 options:
English common law
Magna Carta
English Bill of Rights
Parliament Acts
Answer:
English Bill of Rights
Explanation:
See https://www.history.com/topics/british-history/english-bill-of-rights
Question 1
Which factor contributed MOST to the U.S. government's passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882?
A. Lack of mining jobs in the west.
B. Overcrowded cities in urban areas.
C. Economic sanctions imposed by China.
D. The rise in nativism among Americans.
Answer:
D. The rise in nativism among Americans.
Why is it so important to a president to have the opportunity to appoint a justice to the Supreme Court? a he or she can advise that justice on how to vote on future cases b it makes him or her feel extremely important c the new justice can kick out/replace an existing justice of the president's choice d his/her ideas or political beliefs can be carried on for decades rather than just 4 or 8 years
Answer:
a. he or she can advise that justice on how to vote on future cases
Explanation:
In appointing a judge to the federal supreme court, the president ensures that he will have representation at the largest judicial institution in the country. In this case, the president may advise the individual who has been appointed as a judge to act in accordance with the ideologies and plans that the president has, in a sphere of public power in which he or she has no direct participation.
In this way, the president exercises his power through a powerful and influential figure in the country's legislative branch.
The American fight force in Europe was known as the American Expeditionary Force.
A. True
B. False
The answer would be True. I hope it helped.
two similarities of the state government and the federal government
Answer:
Answer is at the bottom!!
Explanation:
All state governments are modeled after the federal government and consist of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The U.S. Constitution mandates that all states uphold a “republican form” of government, although the three-branch structure is not required.Government is an agency of the State. It acts for the state. It is that agency of the State which formulates the will of the state into laws, implements the laws of the state and ensures conformity to the laws of the state. Government exercises power and authority on behalf of the state.
Hope this helps!!
Faced with an increase in immigration during the first half of the 1800s, some Americans adopted a policy that favored people born in the United States. What was this policy called? exclusion nativism racism persecution
Answer:
Nativism
Explanation:
Nativists feared the large influxes of immigrants to the US in the 1800s, fearing they would take their jobs or hurt the economy.
They favored native people that were born in the US, opposed to immigrants from European countries like Ireland or Germany.
Their policies favoring natives and discriminating immigrants were called nativism.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
What do you think that history would say about Covid?
Answer: one of the difficult times for humanity in general and the medical industry in particular.
The medical industry is always the industry that suffers the most when there is an outbreak of a disease. Because no matter what they do, someone will still blame them.
Maybe in the future, someone will jokingly say that if they were there, the situation would have been better.
Explanation:
What did the Apaches and Jumanos have in common?
Apaches and Jumanos both practiced hunting, gathering and agriculture, this is that they have in common.
What is Agriculture?Agriculture is the cultivation of land, this is the practice also known as farming, this enables the growth of plants, fruits and vegetables.
Apaches are the South American tribes, these are native to America. The Jumanos were merger of several tribes used to live at the present Mexico, they grew beans and corns. Jumanos used to do farming and grew different types of beans and vegetables.
Hunting is the act of finding an animal to eat, and gathering is the act to find food, this could be the finding of new plants, herbs, vegetables and fruits.
Agriculture is the best source of food also it is highly important for a country to survive.
Learn more about agriculture at https://brainly.com/question/4093063
#SPJ1
How can you use the map to argue that Alexander was great
Answer:
Attached you will see the Map of Macedon Empire
Explanation::
The empire of Alexander the Great was so vast that reached borders with India. That was a complete milestone comparing the land extension of other Greek emprires such as the Athenian's. It also covered iconic territories such as Egypt and city of Jerusalen. Certainly he did not conquered everything but his military campaings did pay off for him. It is true there has been bigger empires anf Macedon's, but we can say that the title of Alexander as The Great is well deserved.
Explanation:
Answer:
Alexander the Great was able to conquer many different places. He defeated the Persians after a bitter struggle. He also conquered Egypt and developed a city that he named after himself. ... Alexander the Great's actions definitely allow one to conclude that the title, "The Great" was an appropriate title.
Explanation:
The empire of Alexander the Great was so vast that reached borders with India. That was a complete milestone comparing the land extension of other Greek emprires such as the Athenian's. It also covered iconic territories such as Egypt and city of Jerusalen.
How was the Second Great Awakening similar to, and different from, the First Great Awakening of the 1740s (Chapter 4)
The second great awakening was a period of religious revival that encourages individuals to pursue the knowledge of God and self. The second great awakening contradicted the assertion of the first great awakening during which the doctrine of predestination was introduced and taught
The second great awakening was a time of religious resurgence that exhorts people to seek knowledge of both God and themselves.
What was the second great awakening and how it was similar and different to the First Great Awakening?It was the Second Great Awakening, a time of intense religious passion. The Second Great Awakening placed a strong emphasis on the necessity of converting people to Protestant Christianity, much like the First Great Awakening did in the 1730s and 1740s.
The First Great Awakening concentrated on those who were already attending churches, in contrast to the Second Great Awakening, which got underway about 1800 and reached out to the unchurched. Their self-awareness, piety, and rituals were all altered.
The Congregational churches of New England served as the focal point of the second, more conservative phase of the awakening (1810–25), which was led by theologians Timothy Dwight, Lyman Beecher, Nathaniel W. Taylor, and Asahel Nettleton.
Learn more about the Second Great Awakening, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1100097
#SPJ2
One of the Coercive Acts forced the colonies to allow British soldiers to live among the colonists. true or false
Answer: True, they did force soldiers to live with the colonists. Some colonists were Loyalists who sided with Britain; the other colonists were Patriots who supported the right to independence.
Explanation:
Answer:
true
Explanation:
true
Why was Santa Anna important. Discuss their impact on the Texas Revolution.
Explanation: His army defeated Texan forces at the Alamo and Goliad before moving eastward to the San Jacinto River. He was overpowered and taken by Gen
Definition: He was an Anglican minister, known for his work in the First Great Awakening and his
assistance to John and Charles Wesley in founding the Methodist Church.
Answer:
George Whitefield
Explanation:
The description of "He was an Anglican minister, known for his work in the First Great Awakening and his assistance to John and Charles Wesley in founding the Methodist Church, " matches that of George Whitefield. He was a Briton by nationality and was born in 1714 in Great Britain.
He was popular for being the founders of Methodism and the evangelical movement. He eventually died at age 55 in Newburyport, Province of Massachusetts Bay, British America
What were the "head and master” statutes?
A agreements made by the presidential candidates of 1824
B treaties between the Louisiana government and foreign traders
C laws created to ensure husbands controlled family property
D negotiations between suffrage advocates and the Louisiana government
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Please rate high if I’m correct
In a paragraph of at least 5-7 sentences, describe three long-term factors that led to World War I; then describe the chain of events that caused the war to begin.
Answer: Distribution of colonies, arms race, nationalism.
Explanation:
The end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century were characterized by creating two opposing blocs in Europe. On one side were France and Britain, while on the other side were Austro-Hungary and Germany. This situation is colonial policy; Germany and Austro-Hungary wanted an equal division of the colonies, i.e., "part of the cake" for themselves. France and England had no intention of giving up. There is a weave in armaments; countries have accumulated quantities of weapons because hostility has grown from year to year. Nationalism emerged during the nineteenth century and was at its peak before the beginning. In such circumstances, the Sarajevo assassination was only a pretext for the outbreak of war.
Hi umm can I please get some help I’ve been stuck for the past few days and would love it if someone help I have pictures because I couldn’t write it all down please and thank you to anyone who helps I will also give Points and Brainly to who ever gets it right
Answer:
1.B
2.G
3.E
4.i
5.J
6.A
7.C
8.F
9.D
10.H
How did the Peloponnesian War begin?
Athens invaded Attica to destroy the Spartan navy.
Sparta invaded Delos to take money to pay its soldiers.
Persia declared war on Athens to keep the Athenians from becoming an empire.
Sparta declared war on Athens to prevent the Athenians from becoming too powerful.
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
Sparta feared Athens prosper so they attacked
In order to keep the Athenians from gaining too much power, Sparta declared war on Athens. Hence Option D is correct .
What was Peloponnesian War ?Persian planned to attack the areas that belonged to Sparta and Athens, which led to the start of the Peloponnesian War. Both of them were outnumbered at the time by the Persian empire.
As a result, Sparta and Athens decided to work together to repel the Persian army.
Between 431 and 405 B.C., the two most powerful city-states in ancient Greece, Athens and Sparta, engaged in combat. The Peloponnesian War ushered in a period of regional decline that marked the end of what is regarded as the Golden Age and signified a dramatic power shift in ancient Greece in favor of Sparta.
Between the two, Sparta first assumed the position of leadership. But Leonidas (the individual who oversaw Sparta) Perished as the Persian army besieged them.
After he passed away, the Greeks made the decision to send further support via their naval forces, and they were successful in turning the tide of the conflict.
Learn more about Peloponnesian War here
https://brainly.com/question/18552416
# SPJ 6
Where did all the Desperate peeps go?
Which of the following statements is most likely to have been said by a Federalist?
I'd vote for this new constitution, if it had a bill of rights.
The country is falling apart; we must find a way to hold it together.
I know something must change, but I am afraid of this new system.
I don't want to give up any more liberties; a strong national government is dangerous!
Answer:
I know for sure its not "I'd vote for this new constitution, if it had a bill of rights." because remember the anti-federalists fought for the bill of rights. the federalists said the constitution should be ratified imidietely to prevent chaos.(lol excuse my spelling). same goes with " I don't want to give up any more liberties; a strong national government is dangerous!". im pretty sure its not "I know something must change, but I am afraid of this new system" because that seems to go with the others. i think its " The country is falling apart; we must find a way to hold it together."
Explanation:
5. The struggle for civil rights by minority groups in the United States has
been a long and difficult one. Summarize the conflicts involved in obtaining full
civil rights by blacks, Hispanics, or any other significant minority group.
Answer:
The struggle for civil rights by minority groups.
Explanation:
America had always been a place for people from Europe, Africa, Asia, and Hispanics. There have been movements for equal rights in society by the minority group, including blacks and Hispanics. African American often faced racial violence and discrimination. The Civil Rights Movement involved many different plans and methods, including legal action and nonviolent civil disobedience. The Latin Americans civil rights struggle did not begin in 1903.
The great compromise created..
Answer:
The Great Compromise created two legislative bodies in Congress. According to the Great Compromise, there would be two national legislatures in a bicameral Congress. Members of the House of Representatives would be allocated according to each state's population and elected by the people.
Explanation:
Hope this helped, Have a Wonderful Day!!
please help im no good at history
if you were researching the topic of “what was life like in the 1950s?” what do you think would be a good source? you will need to find a website that shows what life was like in the 1950s and provide the link (URL) to your source.
try searching for magazines/newspapers/advertisements from the 1950s
a supporter of the bolsheviks would most likely agree with which statement
The people should support the provisional government's efforts to reform russian politics