Write a situation involving sales at an ice cream shop that could be reasonably modeled by the equation
4.50+0.50t=6.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean

For the null hypothesis,

H0: µ = 238

For the alternative hypothesis,

H1: µ < 238

This is a left tailed test

b) Since the population standard deviation is not given, the distribution is a student's t.

Since n = 100

Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 100 - 1 = 99

t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)

Where

x = sample mean = 231

µ = population mean = 238

s = samples standard deviation = 80

t = (231 - 238)/(80/√100) = - 0.88

We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes

p = 0.19

c) Since alpha, 0.05 < than the p value, 0.19, then we would fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 5% level of significance, the sample data showed insignificant evidence that the mean weekly unemployment insurance benefit in Virginia was below the national average.

d) Since α = 0.05, the critical value is determined from the t distribution table. Recall that this is a left tailed test. Therefore, we would find the critical value corresponding to 1 - α and reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic is less than the negative of the table value.

1 - α = 1 - 0.05 = 0.95

The negative critical value is - 1.66

Since - 0.88 is greater than - 1.66, then we would fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Answer:33084

Step-by-step explanation:

22056 divided by 2 = Monday

Monday= 11028

11028+22056=33084

Answer:

33084 People were at the baseball game on Sunday and ~Money~ Monday all together.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sunday - 22056

Monday -  "Half as many" 22056 Divided by 2

                  = 11028

Altogether - Sunday + Monday = 33084

As a shortcut on your calculator, you could do:

22056 + (22056 divided by 2)

= 33084

Answer:

670

Step-by-step explanation:

2003-814=1189

1189-519=670

Answer: The third number is 670.

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum means three numbers being added up is equal to 2003 so give two of those numbers you have to add them up and subtract it from 2003 to find the third number.

814 + 519 + x = 2003   where x is the third number

1333 + x = 2003

-1333          -1333  

  x = 670   So the third number is 670

Check:  

 814 + 670 + 519 = 2003

     2003 = 2003   so yes again 670 is the third number.

Answer:

At least 18 of the households have between 2 and 6 televisions.

Step-by-step explanation:

Chebyshev Theorem

The Chebyshev Theorem can also be applied to non-normal distribution. It states that:

At least 75% of the measures are within 2 standard deviations of the mean.

At least 89% of the measures are within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

An in general terms, the percentage of measures within k standard deviations of the mean is given by [tex]100(1 - \frac{1}{k^{2}})[/tex].

In this question:

Mean = 4

Standard deviation = 1

Percentage of households that have between 2 and 6 televisions.

2 = 4 - 2*1

So 2 is two standard deviations below the mean

6 = 4 + 2*1

So 6 is two standard deviations above the mean

By Chebyshev's Theorem, at least 75% of the measures are within 2 standard deviations of the mean.

Out of 24

0.75*24 = 18

At least 18 of the households have between 2 and 6 televisions.

Answer:

x = 17 or x = ±7i

Step-by-step explanation:

x³ − 17x² + 49x − 833 = 0

x² (x − 17) + 49 (x − 17) = 0

(x² + 49) (x − 17) = 0

x = 17 or ±7i

Answer:

y=4x

Step-by-step explanation:

an independent variable is the variable  that is changed or controlled in an experiment or observation to test the effects on the dependent variable

a dependent variable is variable being tested and measured in a scientific experiment

in this case, the number of help desk tickets  closed out is dependent on the number of hours the individual works so y is the number of tickets closed (dependent variable). The number of tickets closed of will be 4 multiplied by the number of hours worked i.e. y=4x

Step-by-step explanation:

9 + 1/6 + 2 1/12

9 + 2.25

11.25

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

2(6x+4)-6+2x=3(4x+3)+1

=14x+2=12x+10

=14x+2-2=12x+10-2

=14x=12x+8

=14x-12x=12x+8-12x

=2x=8

=2x/2=8/2

x=4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Null hypothesis: u = 10

Alternative hypothesis: u =/ 10

Using the formula: t = (x - u) / (s /√n)

Where x = 12, u = 10, s = 5 and n = 25

t= (12-10) / (5/√25)

t = (2)/(5/5)

t = 2/1= 2

t = 2.0

At a 0.01 level of significance with a degree of freedom of 24, the p-value is 0.0569, which is greater than 0.01 we will fail to reject the null and conclude that parents do not read more than the average number of books to their children

Answer:

[tex]t=\frac{20.6-18.7}{\frac{8}{\sqrt{11}}}=0.788[/tex]  

The degrees of freedom are given by;

[tex] df =n-1= 11-1=10[/tex]

And the p value would be:

[tex]p_v =2*P(t_{10}>0.788)=0.449[/tex]  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different than 18.7

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X=20.6[/tex] represent the sample mean

[tex]s=8[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation

[tex]n=11[/tex] sample size  

[tex]\mu_o =18.7[/tex] represent the value to test

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] represent the significance level

t would represent the statistic  

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

Hypotesis to test

We want to verify if the true mean is equal to 18.7, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu =18.7[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu \neq 18.7[/tex]  

The statistic is given by:

[tex]t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info we got:

[tex]t=\frac{20.6-18.7}{\frac{8}{\sqrt{11}}}=0.788[/tex]  

The degrees of freedom are given by;

[tex] df =n-1= 11-1=10[/tex]

And the p value would be:

[tex]p_v =2*P(t_{10}>0.788)=0.449[/tex]  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different than 18.7

Answer:

Half-life of the goo is 49.5 minutes

[tex]G(t)= 300e^{-0.014t}[/tex]

191.7 grams of goo will remain after 32 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Let [tex]M_0\,,\,M_f[/tex] denotes initial and final mass.

[tex]M_0=300\,\,grams\,,\,M_f=37.5\,\,grams[/tex]

According to exponential decay,

[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{M_f}{M_0} \right )=-kt[/tex]

Here, t denotes time and k denotes decay constant.

[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{M_f}{M_0} \right )=-kt\\\ln \left ( \frac{37.5}{300} \right )=-k(150)\\-2.079=-k(150)\\k=\frac{2.079}{150}=0.014[/tex]

So, half-life of the goo in minutes is calculated as follows:

[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{50}{100} \right )=-kt\\\ln \left ( \frac{50}{100} \right )=-(0.014)t\\t=\frac{-0.693}{-0.014}=49.5\,\,minutes[/tex]

Half-life of the goo is 49.5 minutes

[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{M_f}{M_0} \right )=-kt\Rightarrow M_f=M_0e^{-kt}[/tex]

So,

[tex]G(t)= M_f=M_0e^{-kt}[/tex]

Put [tex]M_0=300\,\,grams\,,\,k=0.014[/tex]

[tex]G(t)= 300e^{-0.014t}[/tex]

Put t = 32 minutes

[tex]G(32)= 300e^{-0.014(32)}=300e^{-0.448}=191.7\,\,grams[/tex]

Answer:

5.5 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that the distance is given by:

d = v * t = 50 mph * 1/2 h = 25 miles

The relative speed is given by:

 vr = 55 mph - 50 mph = 5 mph

Now the time required to reach

 would come being:

t = t '+ d / vr

we know that t '= 1/2 h, replacing:

t = 1/2 h + 25 mi / 5 mph

t = 1/2 h + 5 h

t = 5.5 h

Therefore, the required time is 5.5 hours.

Answer:  c) 56.2

Step-by-step explanation:

Compare the original rate to the the new rate:

[tex]\dfrac{diameter}{mph}:\dfrac{24.5\ in}{53\ mph}=\dfrac{26\ in}{x}\\\\\\24.5x=53(26)\\\\\\x=\dfrac{53(26)}{24.5}\\\\\\x=\large\boxed{56.2\ mph}[/tex]

Answer:

6/x^2

Step-by-step explanation:

6x^-2

6*x^-2

6*(1/x^2)

6/x^2

Answer: 1/4+3/8+1/2+5/8+7/8

= 21/8

Hope this helps :)))

Answer:

21/8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

The range is the difference between the highest and lowest number of a data set. 22-6=16

Answer:

629

Step-by-step explanation:

l x w

25x14

4x7

12x18

5x7

629

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

y²+by+16= (y+4)²

y²+by+16= y²+2*4*y+4²

y²+by+16= y²+8y+16

by=8y

b=8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:I don't say u must have to mark my ans as brainliest but if it has really helped u plz don't forget to thank me...

Answer:

The value of x from the equation is 100. Thus, Mrs. Gleason should work for 100 hours per month. 

Step-by-step explanation:

To answer this item, we let x be the number of hours per month that Mrs. Gleason should work. The total budget is equal to sum of the amount acquired by Mr. Gleason and Mrs. Gleason. The equation that would express this is,

                         4,500 = 900(4) + 9x

The value of x from the equation is 100. Thus, Mrs. Gleason should work for 100 hours per month. 

I am sorry if you get this wrong.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

In the attached file

Answer:

y = 1/4x + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Since they gave you point slope form already, all you need to do is convert that into slope-intercept form. Just distribute the parenthesis and move the 4 over. Once you do so, you should get C/3rd option as your answer.

Answer:

[tex]5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Let [tex]x[/tex] be the number of tuba players.

We are given that the number of saxophone players is one less than twice the number of tuba players.

There are 9 saxophone players.

[tex]9 = 2 x-1[/tex]

[tex]9+1=2x[/tex]

[tex]10=2x[/tex]

[tex]10 \div 2=x[/tex]

[tex]5=x[/tex]

If the area of ΔBAC = 24 in², the area of ΔEDF is 6 in².

If two triangles' angles are congruent and their corresponding sides are proportionate, they are considered similar. To put it another way, similar triangles are the same in shape but not necessarily in size. If ΔPQR and ΔMNO are two similar triangles, then we can write it as ΔPQR ∼ ΔMNO.

The square of the ratio of any pair of their respective sides is equal to the ratio of the areas of two similar triangles.

Since ΔBAC ∼ ΔEDF, we can use the above statement to find the area of ΔEDF. Let the area of ΔEDF be x in². Given that length of EF and BC is 2 in and 4 in respectively.

So, we have to solve this equation,

24/x = 4²/2²

Now, 24/x = 16/4

i.e. 24/x = 4

i.e. 4x = 24

i.e. x = 24/4 = 6

Therefore the area of ΔEDF is 6 in².

Learn more about similar triangles here -

https://brainly.com/question/16819417

#SPJ2

Answer:

So we first need to solve for f(4) because thats what's inside g(_)

It should be 4-7 because I think its f(x)=x-7 you weren't very clear on it.

so that means that we need to solve for g(-3)

-3^2 = 9 because -3*-3 = 9

9 is answer

Answer:

x = -8 or x = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

To factor ax² + bx + c, use AC method.

a times c is 1 × -24 = -24.

Factors of ac (-24) that add up to b (5) are 8 and -3.

Divide by a and reduce: 8/1 and -3/1.

Therefore, the factors are x + 8 and x − 3.

x² + 5x − 24 = 0

(x + 8) (x − 3) = 0

x = -8 or 3

Answer:

1) The normal distribution should be used for the sample mean because the population distribution is known to be normal (answer b).

2) C. H0: mu = 519, H_1: mu not equal to 519, reject if z> 1.96 or z< -1.96.

3) Yes. There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true mean is not 519 ml.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) When the population follows a normal distribution, it is correct to assume a normal distribution for the sample mean.

2) As it is a two-tailed decision rule, we are interested in detecting a significant difference below and above the mean. This is why we use the unequal sign in the alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis state that there is not significant difference from 519.

The critical value for a significance level of 5% is z=1.96.

[tex]H_0: \mu=519\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 519[/tex]

3) The claim is that the true mean is not 519 ml.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=519\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 519[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=16.

The sample mean is M=522.

The standard deviation of the population is known and has a value of σ=6.

We can calculate the standard error as:

[tex]\sigma_M=\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{6}{\sqrt{16}}=1.5[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{M-\mu}{\sigma_M}=\dfrac{522-519}{1.5}=\dfrac{3}{1.5}=2[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(z>2)=0.046[/tex]

As the P-value (0.046) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true mean is not 519 ml.

Answer:

3, 943,000

Step-by-step explanation:

3, 942,588

The 2 is in the thousands place

We look at the hundreds place

There is a 5, that means we round up

2 becomes a 3

3, 943,000

Answer: 1/4 of 70,000,000

Step-by-step explanation: 17,500,000 / 70,000,000 = 0.25

Answer:

[tex]25\%[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{17,500,000}{70,000,000}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{4}=0.25=25/100=25\%[/tex]