Suppose that weekly income of migrant workers doing agricultural labor in Florida has a distribution with a mean of $520 and a standard deviation of $90. A researcher randomly selected a sample of 100 migrant workers. What is the probability that sample mean is less than $510

Answer:

52% probability that a randomly selected puppy in the shelter will get adopted and live 7 or more years

Step-by-step explanation:

We use the conditional probability formula to solve this question. It is

[tex]P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(A)}[/tex]

In which

P(B|A) is the probability of event B happening, given that A happened.

[tex]P(A \cap B)[/tex] is the probability of both A and B happening.

P(A) is the probability of A happening.

In this question:

Event A: A puppy is adopted.

Event B: The puppy lives 7 or more years.

An animal shelter has a 65% adoption rate for puppies

This means that [tex]P(A) = 0.65[/tex]

Of the puppies who are adopted, 80% live to be 7 years or older.

This means that [tex]P(B|A) = 0.8[/tex]

What is the probability that a randomly selected puppy in the shelter will get adopted and live 7 or more years

[tex]P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(A)}[/tex]

[tex]P(A \cap B) = P(A)*P(B|A)[/tex]

[tex]P(A \cap B) = 0.65*0.8[/tex]

[tex]P(A \cap B) = 0.52[/tex]

52% probability that a randomly selected puppy in the shelter will get adopted and live 7 or more years

Answer:

1:0.4641

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told that the scale of the model with respect to the real world is 0.1 cubic meter. This means that for every 1 cubic meter in the real world the model represents 0.1.

They tell us that the real world volume is 100,000, that if we assume a cube, we have to:

V = l ^ 3

l = 100000 ^ (1/3)

l = 46.41

46.41 meters would be each side, now the volume of the model would be:

100,000 * 0.1 = 10,000

Which means that its sides would be:

V = l ^ 3

l = 100000 ^ (1/3)

l = 21.54

We calculate the scale of the sides:

21.54 / 46.41 = 0.4641

Which means that for every 1 meter in the real world the model represents 0.4641 meters.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Mean = (87 + 105 + 130 + 160 + 180 + 195 + 135 + 145 + 213 + 105 + 145 + 151 152 + 136 + 87 + 99 + 92 + 119 + 129)/19 = 129

Variance = (summation(x - mean)²/n

Standard deviation = √(summation(x - mean)²/n

n = 19

Variance = [(87 - 129)^2 + (105 - 129)^2 + (130 - 129)^2+ (160 - 129)^2 + (180 - 129)^2 + (195 - 129)^2 + (135 - 129)^2 + (145 - 129)^2 + (213 - 129)^2 + (105 - 129)^2 + (145 - 129)^2 + (151 - 129)^2 + (152 - 129)^2 + (136 - 129)^2 + (87 - 129)^2 + (99 - 129)^2 + (92 - 129)^2 + (119 - 129)^2 + (129 - 129)^2]/19 = 23634/19 1243.895 min

Standard deviation = √1243.895 = 35.269 min

60 minutes = 1 hour

Converting the variance to hours,

Each division would have been divided by 60². 60² can be factorized out

Variance = 23634/60² = 6.565 hours

Converting the standard deviation to hours, it becomes

√6.565 = 2.562 hours

Answer:

9

Equivalent Fractions with the LCD

4 7/9 = 43/9

2 2/3 = 24/9

For the denominators (9, 3) the least common multiple (LCM) is 9.

Therefore, the least common denominator (LCD) is 9.

4 7/9 = 43/9 × 1/1 = 43/9

2 2/3 = 8/3 × 3/3 = 24/9

Hope this helps :)

The least common denominator of 4 7/9 and 2 2/3 is 9.

Given data:

To find the least common denominator (LCD) of 4 7/9 and 2 2/3, we need to first convert both fractions to their equivalent forms with a common denominator.

The given fractions are:

4 7/9 = 4 + 7/9

2 2/3 = 2 + 2/3

To find a common denominator, we need to find the least common multiple (LCM) of the denominators 9 and 3, which is 9.

Now, let's convert the fractions to their equivalent forms with a denominator of 9:

4 7/9 = (4 * 9)/9 + (7/9) = 36/9 + 7/9 = 43/9

2 2/3 = (2 * 9)/9 + (2/3) = 18/9 + 2/3 = 20/9

The fractions 4 7/9 and 2 2/3 are now expressed with a common denominator of 9.

Hence, the least common denominator (LCD) of 4 7/9 and 2 2/3 is 9.

To learn more about least common denominator click :

https://brainly.com/question/24510622

#SPJ2

Answer:

Hello!

I believe your answer is:

4a(b+2c)

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this worked for you!  Good luck!

Answer:

  (-3, 4) is a solution

Step-by-step explanation:

The point (-3, 4) is inside the shaded area of the graph, so is a solution.

You can check in the inequality

  y > -2x -3

  4 > -2(-3) -3 . . . . substitute for x and y

  4 > 3 . . . . . . . true; the given point is a solution

Answer:

51.5m

Step-by-step explanation:

half 8.1 to get the radius (4.05)

then times pi by 4.05 squared

your answer is 51.5 (rounded)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let s, b, a represent the numbers of servings of steak, baked eggs, and acorn squash, respectively. Then the equations we want to solve are ...

  40s +20b +4a = 64 . . . . grams of protein

  10s +2b +20a = 29 . . . . grams of carbohydrate

  1s +20b +32a = 72.5 . . . milligrams of vitamin A

There are any number of calculators or web sites that will solve this system of equations for you. The solution is ...

  s = 0.5

  b = 2

  a = 1

The dietitian should provide 1/2 serving of steak, 2 servings of baked eggs, and 1 serving of acorn squash.

Answer:

a) 8.13

b) 4.10

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the rate of reaction R'(t) = 2/t+1 + 1/√t+1

In order to get the total reaction R(t) to the drugs at this times, we need to first integrate the given function to get R(t)

On integrating R'(t)

∫ (2/t+1 + 1/√t+1)dt

In integration, k∫f'(x)/f(x) dx = 1/k ln(fx)+C where k is any constant.

∫ (2/t+1 + 1/√t+1)dt

= ∫ (2/t+1)dt+ ∫ (1/√t+1)dt

= 2∫ 1/t+1 dt +∫1/+(t+1)^1/2 dt

= 2ln(t+1) + 2(t+1)^1/2 + C

= 2ln(t+1) + 2√(t+1) + C

a) For total reactions from t = 1 to t = 12

When t = 1

R(1) = 2ln2 + 2√2

≈ 4.21

When t = 12

R(12) = 2ln13 + 2√13

≈ 12.34

R(12) - R(1) ≈ 12.34-4.21

≈ 8.13

Total reactions to the drugs over the period from t = 1 to t= 12 is approx 8.13.

b) For total reactions from t = 12 to t = 24

When t = 12

R(12) = 2ln13 + 2√13

≈ 12.34

When t = 24

R(24) = 2ln25 + 2√25

≈ 16.44

R(12) - R(1) ≈ 16.44-12.34

≈ 4.10

Total reactions to the drugs over the period from t = 12 to t= 24 is approx 4.10

Answer:

(10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16)

Step-by-step explanation:

The minimum number of tables that the store has to sell in order to meet the requirements is given by:

[tex](25-t)*100+t*550=7,000\\(550-100)t=7,000-2,500\\t = 10\ tables[/tex]

The company must sell at least 10 tables.

Since the company already sold 9 chairs, and they can ship at most 25 items, they can sell at most 16 tables. Every integer number between the minimum and maximum is also possible:

(10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16).

Answer:

12,13,14,15,16

Step-by-step explanation:

\underline{\text{Define Variables:}}

Define Variables:

​

May choose any letters.

\text{Let }t=

Let t=

\,\,\text{the number of tables sold}

the number of tables sold

\text{Let }c=

Let c=

\,\,\text{the number of chairs sold}

the number of chairs sold

\text{\textquotedblleft at most 25 pieces"}\rightarrow \text{25 or fewer pieces}

“at most 25 pieces"→25 or fewer pieces

Use a \le≤ symbol

Therefore the total number of furniture pieces sold, t+ct+c, must be less than or equal to 25:25:

t+c\le 25

t+c≤25

\text{\textquotedblleft no less than \$7000"}\rightarrow \text{\$7000 or more}

“no less than $7000"→$7000 or more

Use a \ge≥ symbol

The store makes $550 for each table sold, so for tt tables, the store will make 550t550t dollars. The store makes $100 for each chair sold, so for cc chairs, the store will make 100c100c dollars. Therefore, the total revenue 550t+100c550t+100c must be greater than or equal to \$7000:$7000:

550t+100c\ge 7000

550t+100c≥7000

\text{Plug in }9\text{ for }c\text{ and solve each inequality:}

Plug in 9 for c and solve each inequality:

The store sold 9 chairs

\begin{aligned}t+c\le 25\hspace{10px}\text{and}\hspace{10px}&550t+100c\ge 7000 \\ t+\color{green}{9}\le 25\hspace{10px}\text{and}\hspace{10px}&550t+100\left(\color{green}{9}\right)\ge 7000 \\ t\le 16\hspace{10px}\text{and}\hspace{10px}&550t+900\ge 7000 \\ \hspace{10px}&550t\ge 6100 \\ \hspace{10px}&t\ge 11.09 \\ \end{aligned}

t+c≤25and

t+9≤25and

t≤16and

​

550t+100c≥7000

550t+100(9)≥7000

550t+900≥7000

550t≥6100

t≥11.09

​

\text{The values of }t\text{ that make BOTH inequalities true are:}

The values of t that make BOTH inequalities true are:

\{12,\ 13,\ 14,\ 15,\ 16\}

{12, 13, 14, 15, 16}

\text{(the final answer is this entire list)}

(the final answer is this entire list)

The time taken in draining salt so that only 88 kg of salt remains in tank will be 35.71 sec.

It is given that a tank contains 2000 liters of a solution consisting 112 kg of salt is dissolved in water. Pure water is then pumped at rate of 12 L/sec.

We have to find out that how long it will take to drain out salt such that only 88kg of salt remains in tank.

What will be the amount of water flow ; if a water flows for 4 hours at constant speed of 120 liter /hour ?

The amount of water flow will be 120 liter / hour × 4 hour or 120 × 4 liter or 480 liters.

As per the question ;

In 2000 liters solution there is 112 kg salt.

The pumping speed of water into tank = 12 L/s

The salt pumping per second will be ;

= ( 12L/s × 112kg salt ) / 2000 L

= 0.672 Kg salt/sec

This means that 0.672 kg per second salt comes out .

It should be found that the amount of salt that must be drained so that only 88 kg of salt remain.

So , the amount of salt drained out will be ; (x kg)

⇒ 112kg salt - x kg salt = 88 kg salt

⇒ x kg salt = 112 - 88

⇒ x kg salt = 24 kg

The time taken until only 88 kg of salt remains in the​ tank will be ;

= 24 / 0.672

= 35.71 sec

Thus , the time taken in draining salt so that only 88 kg of salt remains in tank will be 35.71 sec.

To learn more about time and rate click here ;

https://brainly.com/question/3581191

#SPJ2

Answer:

Discount = $45

Final = $255

Step-by-step explanation:

First you would multiply $300 by .85. (You do this because your only paying for 85% of the computer) to get the final price

$255

In order to get the discount amount you would subtract 300 by 255 to get

$45

Answer:

j=13, g=20.8, h=24

Step-by-step explanation:

The overall shape given and the shape within, are both right triangles. With right triangles, you are allowed to use the pythagorean theorem formula ([tex]a^{2} + b^{2} = c^{2}[/tex]) in order to solve for some sides. In this case, that would be j and h. The five in the smaller triangle is represented by b and the 12 is the hypotenuse so it is represented by c. When you plug in those numbers in the pythagorean theorem formula, you will find the value of j to be 13. When looking at this, we see that 12 is the second greatest value in the right triangle values that we just found, so we know the the opposing angle for that one will be 60 degrees. The 5's opposing side is therefore 30 degrees. When subtracting 90 and 30, we get 60, so therefore you can use the 30 60 90 formula to find the sides of the bigger triangle. The 60 degrees represents g. This formula will be [tex]a\sqrt{3}[/tex]. The a is 12 since it is the smallest value. So therefore, g is [tex]12\sqrt{3}[/tex], which is 20.8. Now that we have this side, we can just use the pythagorean theorem formula to find the remaining side. Therefore, h is going to be 24

Here is the full question:

When a species has several variants of a phenotype passed on from generation to generation, we can form a hypothesis about the genetics of the trait based on Mendelian theories of genetic inheritance. For example, in a two-gene dominant epistatic model, the first gene masks the effect of the second gene, leading to the expression of three phenotype variants. Crossing the dominant and recessive homozygote lines would result in a second generation represented by a mix of dominant, intermediate, and recessive phenotype variants in the expected proportions: and respectively, also called a 12:3: 1 ratio.

Such a model can provide the basis for the null hypothesis in a significance test. A cross of white and green summer squash plants gives the number of squash in the second generation F2: 131 white squash, 34 yellow squash, and 10 green squash. Are these data consistent with a 12: 3: 1 dominant epistatic model of genetic inheritance( white being dominant)?

The null hypothesis for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is                

Answer:

The null  hypothesis for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is :

[tex]\mathbf{H_o:p_{white} = \frac{12}{16}, p_{yellow} = \frac{3}{16}; p_{green} = \frac{1}{16} }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The objective of this question is to state the null hypothesis for the  chi-square goodness-of-fit test.

Given that:

There are three colors associated with this model . i,e White , yellow and green and they are in the ratio of 12:3:1

The total number of these color traits associated with this model = 12 + 3 + 1 = 16

Thus ;

The null  hypothesis for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is :

[tex]\mathbf{H_o:p_{white} = \frac{12}{16}, p_{yellow} = \frac{3}{16}; p_{green} = \frac{1}{16} }[/tex]

Answer:

540

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the surface area is 408, we can set up the equation

2*9*6 + 2*r*9 + 2*r*6 = 408

108 + 30r = 408

30r = 300

r = 10

The volume is length * width * height

9*6*10 = 540

answer will be 10cm² as i calculate it

Answer:

8/3

Step-by-step explanation:

6(x-2)=4

x-2=4/6

x= 8/3

Answer:

x = 8/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Use Distributive Property

6(x-2) = 4

6x -12 = 4

add 12 on both sides

6x = 16

Divide by 6

x = 8/3

In decimal form: 2.667

Answer:

(A) P (n,k) = n!/(n-k)! divided by 2

(B) C (n,3) = n!/(12)(n-3)!

(C) C (n,k) = n!/(n-k)!(k!)

Step-by-step explanation:

Permutation deals with order or arrangement or position of objects. Where this does not matter, we use the Combination formula.

We divide by 2 in all cases, because no 2 chosen chairs should be adjacent.

For (B), n=10

C (n,3) = n!/(n-3)!(3!) divided by 2

3! = 3×2×1 = 6

The expression divided by 2 means it will be multiplied by 1/2

Hence 6×2 = 12

And we arrive at

C (n,3) =n!/(12)(n-3)!

Answer:

The minimum score required for an A grade is 77.

Step-by-step explanation:

When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 67.7, \sigma = 7.8[/tex]

Find the minimum score required for an A grade.

Top 12% of scores get an A.

100-12 = 88th percentile.

The 88th percentile of scores is the minimum required for an A grade. This score is X when Z has a pvalue of 0.88. So X when Z = 1.175.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]1.175 = \frac{X - 67.7}{7.8}[/tex]

[tex]X - 67.7 = 7.8*1.175[/tex]

[tex]X = 76.865[/tex]

Rounding to the nearest whole number:

The minimum score required for an A grade is 77.

Answer:

2 liters of paint.

Step-by-step explanation:

First we nned to know to total area of the wall by using the formula A = lw

A = 4*5 = 20m²

then we given 1 liter cover 10 m², 20 m² = 2 liters of paint.

Answer:

5x - 4y = 20

Step-by-step explanation:

First find slope

(5- -10)/(8- -4) = 15/12 = 5/4

(y - 5) = 5/4 (x - 8), multiply everything by 4 so you don't have fractions

4y - 20 = 5x - 40

5x - 4y = 20

Answer:

Its depending on the angle

Answer:

  (-2.60, -6.80)

Step-by-step explanation:

The new coordinates can be found by multiplying by the rotation matrix:

  [tex]\left[\begin{array}{c}x'&y'\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}\cos{\theta}&-\sin{\theta}\\\sin{\theta}&\cos{\theta}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}x&y\end{array}\right][/tex]

That is, ...

  x' = x·cos(175°) -y·sin(175°) = 2(-0.9962) -7(0.0872) = -2.60

  y' = x·sin(175°) +y·cos(175°) = 2(0.0872) +7(-0.9962) = -6.80

The new coordinates are ...

  (x', y') = (-2.60, -6.80)

Answer:

Cable: 10%  Satellite: 40%  Streaming Service: 50%

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 10 friends  

1 has cable

4 have satellite

5 have streaming service  

Which means:

Cable is 10%

Satellite is 40%

Streaming Service is 50%

Answer:

Cable Television: 10%

Satellite Television: 40%

Streaming Service: 50%

Step-by-step explanation:

Cable television: [tex]\frac{1}{1+4+5} =\frac{1}{10} =\frac{10}{100}[/tex] or 10%

Satellite television: [tex]\frac{4}{1+4+5} =\frac{4}{10} =\frac{40}{100}[/tex] or 40%

Streaming service: [tex]\frac{5}{1+4+5} =\frac{5}{10} =\frac{50}{100}[/tex] or 50%

Area = length x width

Area = 5/6 x 3/4

= (5x3) / (6x4)

= 15/24

= 5/8 square miles

Answer:

He is incorrect. Ray RO and ray RL are not opposite rays.

Step-by-step explanation:

Two angles are linear pair if they are supplementary and share a leg. 

∠ORP and ∠LRP are not supplementary, because ray RO and ray RL are not opposite rays.

Therefore, ∠ORP and ∠LRP are not linear pair.

correct me if this is wrong

Answer:

$976

Step-by-step explanation:

Straight time pay= $15.25(hourly rate) × 40(hours worked)= $610

Overtime Rate = 15.25×2= $30.50

Overtime Pay= $30.5 × 12 (Hours worked overtime)= $366

Total Pay= Basic wage + Overtime Wage = $976

Answer:

f(2) = f(3) = 102 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The height f at t = 2 seconds is given by:

[tex]f(t) = -16t^2 + 80t + 6\\f(2) = -16*2^2 + 80*2 + 6\\f(2)=-64+160+6\\f(2)=102\ ft[/tex]

The height f at t = 3 seconds is given by:

[tex]f(t) = -16t^2 + 80t + 6\\f(3) = -16*3^2 + 80*3 + 6\\f(3)=-144+240+6\\f(3)=102\ ft[/tex]

For both t =2 and t =3, the expression results in a height of 102 ft, therefore f(2) = f(3) = 102 ft.

Answer:

3√2

Step-by-step explanation:

If you draw the diagonal, you have a 45°45°90° triangle.

The two legs are 3, so the hypotenuse is 3√2