What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (-3, -3) and
(-18, -23)? Write your answer in simplest form.

Answer: 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

The cheesiest recipe would be 1 cup and the least cheesy recipe would be 3/4 cups

1 - 3/4 = 1/4

Answer:

[tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] cup of cheese

Step-by-step explanation:

The least cheesiest recipe uses [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] cup of cheese while the most cheesiest uses 1 cup of cheese.

[tex]1-\frac{3}{4} =\\\\\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

The most cheesiest uses [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] cup more cheese than the least cheesiest.

Answer:1. uses a related sample - repeated measures

2. . does not use a related sample--a

Step-by-step explanation:

Question 1.

step1  A repeated measure design is a design which measures a given sample repeatedly over a given time using different conditions or related measures.

step 2:In the treatment for compulsive hoarding, Here, measures are taken two times ie before and after treatment on the same 50 hoarders which shows a repeated measure, also the design is a within related sample of the same 50 hoarders to give measurement at different conditions  of treatment for  high and low hoarding scores so the design describes  a related sample - repeated measures

Question 2:

step 1 ; An unrelated sample  occurs when Samples being measured do not depend on each other  

Step 2;  1st Sample for comparison by John are random lonely people  and Second Sample are random non lonely people. so the two samples are independent on each other and will give different  measurement based on quality of sleep.   So the design does not use a related sample

Answer:

No. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of liberals is higher than that reported by the polling​ organization (P-value = 0.0366).

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete: there is no information about the results of the survey. We will assume that 55 of the subjects answer "liberal", and test the claim.

This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.

The claim is that the proportion of liberals is higher than that reported by the polling​ organization.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi=0.22\\\\H_a:\pi>0.22[/tex]

The significance level is 0.01.

The sample has a size n=200.

The sample proportion is p=0.275.

[tex]p=X/n=55/200=0.275[/tex]

The standard error of the proportion is:

[tex]\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.22*0.78}{200}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.000858}=0.029[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p-\pi-0.5/n}{\sigma_p}=\dfrac{0.275-0.22-0.5/200}{0.029}=\dfrac{0.053}{0.029}=1.792[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(z>1.792)=0.0366[/tex]

As the P-value (0.0366) is greater than the significance level (0.01), the effect is  not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of liberals is higher than that reported by the polling​ organization.

Answer:

3.6

Step-by-step explanation:

d = sqrt(3^2+2^2) = sqrt(13) = 3.6

Answer:

$350

Step-by-step explanation:

Let d = price of dryer

Then d - 61 is the price of the washer.

The sum of the prices is $639.

d + d - 61 = 639

2d - 61 = 639

2d = 700

d = 350

The price of the dryer is $350

This type of blinding is used to prevent what is referred to as placebo effect in this scenario.

This refers to a situation where some individuals feel improvement in their health when dummy treatment is used.

The subjects not being unaware of the treatment helps to prevent the placebo effect thereby making it the most appropriate choice.

Read more about Placebo effect here https://brainly.com/question/10467057

#SPJ1

Answer:

I think that angles 1 and 2 are complementary

Step-by-step explanation:

option 1

plz mark brainliest!

Answer:a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D.

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of cylinder = base area × height

25.5 = A × 4.8

A = 25.5/4.8

A = 5.3 inch ²

Answer:

Where is the diagram?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

OC and OE are apposite rays so the Answer is yes

Answer is A

Midpoint

[tex] \frac{x \: a xis}{2} . \frac{y \: axis}{2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{2 + 2}{2} . \frac{4 + ( - 9)}{2} [/tex]

[tex](2. - 2.5 )[/tex]

Answer:

The equation are

    [tex]x =\frac{ 12-z }{h} 8 cos (2 z)[/tex]

    [tex]y = \frac{12-z }{12} 8sin (2z)[/tex]

    z = z

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The radius of the conical helix is  [tex]r= 8[/tex]

    The height of the conical helix is  [tex]h = 12[/tex]

    The angular frequency  is  [tex]w = 2[/tex]

The plot of the conical helix is  shown on the first uploaded image

 Generally  the parametric equation of a conical helix is mathematically represented as

for x -axis

     [tex]x =\frac{ h-z }{h} r cos (wz)[/tex]

substituting values

      [tex]x =\frac{ 12-z }{h} 8 cos (2 z)[/tex]

for  y-axis

     [tex]y = \frac{h-z }{h} rsin (wz)[/tex]

substituting values

      [tex]y = \frac{12-z }{12} 8sin (2z)[/tex]

for  z-axis

   z = z

Answer

g(x) moves 4 spaces to the left compared to f(x),  

when g(4)=0  when f(0)=0

when g(3)=1   when f(-1)=1

...

and so on

Answer:

d. 102.3 units ^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A. 90 sq. units

Step-by-step explanation:

5(18) = 90

Answer: 400

Step-by-step explanation:

25% is equal to one quarter (1/4). If theres 100 red gumballs then there must be 300 more gumballs in the machine because a quarter of a number is always even.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

let the height height of the tree be "h"

Hence the tree's height h=9 ft

one year later,let the height of the tree increased by x ft

hence

[tex]9 + x = 16[/tex] --------This is the equation for the growth of the tree

In order to solve for the added height(growth) of the tree we need to solve for x

[tex]9 + x = 16\\x=16-9\\x=7ft[/tex]

Answer:

The probability of choosing a heart and not a club is

P =  0.1875

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 13 hearts in a deck of 52 cards. The probability that the chosen card will be a heart is given by

Probability = favorable outcome/ Total number of outcomes

P= 13/52= 1/4

There are 13 clubs in a deck of 52 cards.

The probability of not choosing a club would be

P = 52-13/52= 39/52= 3/4

So the  combined probability of choosing a heart and not a club is

P = 1/4 * 3/4= 0.25 * 0.75= 0.1875

Answer:

  184 square cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of areas is the square of the ratio of the scale factor. The larger triangle has an area of ...

  (15 cm²)(3.5²) = 183.75 cm²

The area of the similar triangle is about 184 cm².

Answer:

432

Step-by-step explanation:

l x w

4x3

4x19

8x24

8x19

432

Answer:

[tex]cos(-\theta) = -0.73[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

It is given that:

[tex]sin(\theta -\dfrac{\pi}{2}) = 0.73[/tex]

Formula to be used:

[tex]1.\ sin(-x) = -sinx\\2.\ sin(\dfrac{\pi}{2}-x) = cosx\\3.\ cos(-x) = cosx[/tex]

Using Formula (1) written above:

[tex]\Rightarrow sin (\theta - \dfrac{\pi}{2})=sin(-(\dfrac{\pi}{2}-\theta ))\\\Rightarrow -sin(\dfrac{\pi}{2}-\theta)[/tex]

Now, using Formula (2) written above:

[tex]\Rightarrow -sin(\dfrac{\pi}{2}-\theta) = -cos \theta[/tex]

So, we can say that:

[tex]sin(\theta -\dfrac{\pi}{2}) = -cos\theta = 0.73 ...... (1)[/tex]

We have to find the value of [tex]cos(-\theta)[/tex].

Using Formula (3) written above:

[tex]cos(-\theta) = cos\theta[/tex]

So, ultimately we need to find the value of [tex]cos\theta[/tex]

Using equation (1):

[tex]-cos\theta = 0.73\\\Rightarrow cos\theta = -0.73[/tex]

So, the answer is [tex]cos(-\theta) = -0.73[/tex].

Answer:

1, -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Let  x^-1 = 1/x = y

1. Root 1

2. Root 2

Answer:

9 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of rectangle= length ×width

Let the length of the rectangle be x inches.

Width of rectangle= (x +2) inches

since the width is 2 more than the length.

63= x(x+2)

63= x(x) +2x

Bringing constant to one side,

x² +2x -63= 0

(x +9)(x-7) = 0 (factorise)

x+9= 0 or x-7= 0

x= -9 or x= 7

(reject)

width of rectangle

= 7+2

= 9 inches

*We reject x= -9 since the length of the rectangle cannot be a negative number.

Answer:144 sweets

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

   9 in

Step-by-step explanation:

For an n-sided polygon, the length of the apothem is ...

  a = r·cos(180°/n)

We assume your problem statement is saying the radius is 10 inches. For a hexagon, n=6 and we have ...

  a = (10 in)cos(30°) ≈ 8.66 in

Rounded to the nearest inch, the apothem is 9 in.

Answer:

Finding 1/5 of something is the same as dividing that number by 5. Since 24 isn't divisible by 5, 24 / 5 is not an integer. Since you can't have 4.8 species of animals the answer to (a) is no.

For (b), 1/3 * 24 = 8 and 24 - 8 = 16.

Answer:

37.047

Step-by-step explanation:

Sin(39) = 30/hyp

Cos(39) = x/hyp

hyp = 30/Sin(39)

and hyp = x/Cos(39)

hyp = hyp

30/Sin(39) = x/Cos(39)

x = 30(Cos(39))/Sin(39)

x is approximately equal to 37.047

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean of the reading points is

Mean = (5.8 + 5.9 + 4.9 + 5.2 + 5.0 + 4.9 + 6.2 + 5.1 + 5.7 + 6.1)/10 = 5.48

The process is out of control if the mean salt level of the readings is greater than 5.4

For the null hypothesis,

µ = 5.4

For the alternative hypothesis,

µ > 5.4

This is a right tailed test.

Since the population standard deviation is given, z score would be determined from the normal distribution table. The formula is

z = (x - µ)/(σ/√n)

Where

x = sample mean

µ = population mean

σ = population standard deviation

n = number of samples

From the information given,

µ = 5.4

x = 5.48

σ = 0.3

n = 10

z = (5.48 - 5.4)/(0.3/√10) = 0.84

Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is 0.7996

The probability value to the right of the z score is 1 - 0.7996 = 0.2

Assuming a significance level of 0.05

Since alpha, 0.05 < than the p value, 0.2, then we would fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 5% level of significance, we can conclude that the process is not out of control. If we had rejected the null hypothesis, then our conclusion would be that the process is out of control.