The number of traffic accidents at a certain intersection is thought to be well modeled by a Poisson process. If the probability of no accident within a year is 5 percent. What is the mean waiting time between accidents

Answer:[tex]y=-\frac{3}{2} x+12[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Perpendicular lines have inversely proportional slopes. So make the slope negative and switch it to its reciprocal.

2/3x would change into -3/2x

Lets write that down for a starting point for our perpendicular line.

y = -3/2x + b

We were given the x and y value via the coords. x = 12 and y = -6

Now we have -6 = -3/2(12) + b. Multiply -3 and 12 to get -36, then divide by 2 to get -18.  Now it's -6 = -18 + b. Solve for b by adding 18 to both sides to get b = 12

Answer:

B. Cluster

Step-by-step explanation:

Samples may be classified as:

Random: Basically, put all the options into a hat and drawn some of them.

Systematic: Every kth element is taken. For example, you want to survey something on the street, you interview every 5th person, for example.

Cluster: Divides population into groups, called clusters, and each element in the cluster is surveyed.

Stratified: Also divides the population into groups. However, then only some elements of the group are surveyed.

In this question:

Each Continental Airlines flight is a group.

30 of them are chosen, and in each group chosen, every passenger is surveyed.

So cluster sampling was used.

Answer:

465 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Please see attached picture for full solution.

1. substitute the value of A with the surface area of the pond

2. ensure that the coefficient of e is 1.

3. ln both sides

4. bring power down (for left side)

5. ln e= 1

6. find time taken in days

7. change number of days to hours

Answer:

5q + 9

Step-by-step explanation:

Combine like terms to simplify the expression.

Have a blessed day!

Answer:

7q+9

Step-by-step explanation:

6q+4+q+5

6q+q+4+5

=7q+9

Answer is A

Midpoint

[tex] \frac{x \: a xis}{2} . \frac{y \: axis}{2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{2 + 2}{2} . \frac{4 + ( - 9)}{2} [/tex]

[tex](2. - 2.5 )[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]a = 5 ,\\b = - 2 \\ c = - 2 \\ 2b - 3ac=?\\2(-2) -3(5)(-2)\\-4 +30\\= 26[/tex]

Answer:

-34

Step-by-step explanation:

2x-2-3(4)(-2)

which is -34

Answer:

m = - 5

Step-by-step Explanation:

[tex]-3(1-5m)=-38+8m \\ \\ - 3 + 15m = - 38 + 8m \\ \\ 15m - 8m = 3 - 38 \\ \\ 7m = - 35 \\ \\ m = \frac{ - 35}{7} \\ \\ \huge \purple{ \boxed{m = - 5}}[/tex]

Answer:

-5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A. 90 sq. units

Step-by-step explanation:

5(18) = 90

Answer:

someone already answered

Step-by-step explanation:

srry

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean of the reading points is

Mean = (5.8 + 5.9 + 4.9 + 5.2 + 5.0 + 4.9 + 6.2 + 5.1 + 5.7 + 6.1)/10 = 5.48

The process is out of control if the mean salt level of the readings is greater than 5.4

For the null hypothesis,

µ = 5.4

For the alternative hypothesis,

µ > 5.4

This is a right tailed test.

Since the population standard deviation is given, z score would be determined from the normal distribution table. The formula is

z = (x - µ)/(σ/√n)

Where

x = sample mean

µ = population mean

σ = population standard deviation

n = number of samples

From the information given,

µ = 5.4

x = 5.48

σ = 0.3

n = 10

z = (5.48 - 5.4)/(0.3/√10) = 0.84

Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is 0.7996

The probability value to the right of the z score is 1 - 0.7996 = 0.2

Assuming a significance level of 0.05

Since alpha, 0.05 < than the p value, 0.2, then we would fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 5% level of significance, we can conclude that the process is not out of control. If we had rejected the null hypothesis, then our conclusion would be that the process is out of control.

Answer:

A manufacturing machine has a 40% defect rate. If 131 items are chosen at random, then:

Answer:

d. 102.3 units ^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

No. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of liberals is higher than that reported by the polling​ organization (P-value = 0.0366).

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete: there is no information about the results of the survey. We will assume that 55 of the subjects answer "liberal", and test the claim.

This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.

The claim is that the proportion of liberals is higher than that reported by the polling​ organization.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi=0.22\\\\H_a:\pi>0.22[/tex]

The significance level is 0.01.

The sample has a size n=200.

The sample proportion is p=0.275.

[tex]p=X/n=55/200=0.275[/tex]

The standard error of the proportion is:

[tex]\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.22*0.78}{200}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.000858}=0.029[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p-\pi-0.5/n}{\sigma_p}=\dfrac{0.275-0.22-0.5/200}{0.029}=\dfrac{0.053}{0.029}=1.792[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(z>1.792)=0.0366[/tex]

As the P-value (0.0366) is greater than the significance level (0.01), the effect is  not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of liberals is higher than that reported by the polling​ organization.

Answer:

: 4qrs • (qr2 + 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Step by step solution :

Step 1 :

Equation at the end of step 1 :

((22q2 • r3) • s) + 8qrs

Pulling out like terms :

3.1 Pull out like factors :

4q2r3s + 8qrs = 4qrs • (qr2 + 2)

Final result :

4qrs • (qr2 + 2)

I am really soo sorry if the answer is wrong!

Answer:

x= -19

Step-by-step explanation:

2x-4x-9=29

-2x=29+9

x=38/-2

= -19

Answer:

[tex]x=2-\sqrt{42}[/tex] and [tex]x=2+\sqrt{42} \\[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve using the quadratic formula, which is [tex]x=\frac{-b + \sqrt{b^{2}-4ac }}{2a}[/tex] and [tex]x=\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac } }{2a}[/tex]

Answer

g(x) moves 4 spaces to the left compared to f(x),  

when g(4)=0  when f(0)=0

when g(3)=1   when f(-1)=1

...

and so on

This type of blinding is used to prevent what is referred to as placebo effect in this scenario.

This refers to a situation where some individuals feel improvement in their health when dummy treatment is used.

The subjects not being unaware of the treatment helps to prevent the placebo effect thereby making it the most appropriate choice.

Read more about Placebo effect here https://brainly.com/question/10467057

#SPJ1

Answer: A (30)

Step-by-step explanation:

By defaults, data will be enabled in tens. And it increases by replicating the initial value.

There is no way the maximum number of dataflow definitions available in this situation will be 45, 25 or 35

The only possible replicant that can be available is 30

Answer:

  0

Step-by-step explanation:

The x-axis corresponds to the line y = 0. All points on the x-axis have a y-value of zero.

Answer:144 sweets

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  a = (d -c)/b

Step-by-step explanation:

Undo the addition of c, by subtracting c.

  ab +c -c = d -c

  ab = d - c

Undo the multiplication by b, by dividing by b.

  ab/b = (d -c)/b

  a = (d -c)/b

Answer:

[tex]\fbox{\begin{minipage}{14em}Number of subsets: 16\\Number of proper subsets: 15\end{minipage}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

The set A = {5, 13, 17, 20}

Question:

Find the number of subsets of A

Find the number of proper subsets of A

Simple solution by counting:

Subset of A that has 0 element:

{∅} - 1 set

Subset of A that has 1 element:

{5}, {13}, {17}, {20} - 4 sets

Subset of A that has 2 elements:

{5, 13}, {5, 17}, {5, 20}, {13, 17}, {13, 20}, {17, 20} - 6 sets

Subset of A that has 3 elements:

{5, 13, 17}, {5, 13, 20}, {5, 17, 20}, {13, 17, 20} - 4 sets

Subset of A that has 4 elements:

{5, 13, 17, 20} - 1 set

In total, the number of subsets of A: N = 1 + 4 + 6 + 4 + 1 = 16

The number of proper subsets (all of subsets, except subset which is equal to original set A): N = 16 - 1 = 15

Key-point:

The counting method might be used for finding the number of subsets when the original set contains few elements.

The question is that, for a set that contains many elements, how to find out the number of subsets?

The answer is that: there is a fix formula to calculate the total number ([tex]N[/tex]) of subsets of a set containing [tex]n[/tex] elements: N = [tex]2^{n}[/tex]

With original set A = {5, 13, 17, 20}, there are 4 elements belonged to A.

=> Number of subsets of A: N = [tex]2^{4} = 16[/tex]

(same result as using counting method)

Brief proof of formula: N = [tex]2^{n}[/tex]

Each element of original set is considered in 2 status: existed or not.

If existed => fill that element in.

If not => leave empty.

For i.e.: empty subset means  that all elements are selected as not existed, subset with 1 element means that all elements are selected as not existed, except 1 element, ... and so on.

=> From the point of view of a permutation problem, for each element in original set, there are 2 ways to select: existed or not. There are [tex]n[/tex] elements in total. => There are [tex]2^n}[/tex] ways to select, or in other words, there are [tex]2^{n}[/tex] subsets.

Hope this helps!

:)

Answer:

[tex]CI = (\bar{x_{1} } - \bar{x_{2}} ) \pm MoE\\\\[/tex]

[tex]CI = (527 - 439) \pm 25.75\\\\CI = 88 \pm 25.75\\\\CI = 88 - 25.75 \:\: and \:\: 88 + 25.75\\\\CI = (62.2 \: ,\: 113.8 )[/tex]

The correct answer choice is a. (62.2, 113.8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Of the 500 customers who were told the increase applied to charges above $1000 each month, the average increase in spending was $527 with a standard deviation of $225.

Sample size = n₁ = 500

Sample mean = x₁ = $527

Standard deviation = s₁ = $225

Of the 500 customers who were told the increase applied to charges above $2000 each month, the average increase in spending was $439 with a standard deviation of $189

Sample size = n₂ = 500

Sample mean = x₂ = $439

Standard deviation = s₂ = $189

We are asked to find the 95% confidence interval for the difference between two means.

The given group of answer choices are

a. (62.2, 113.8)

b. (86.2, 120.5)

c. (10.3, 23.8)

d. (55.6, 67.8)

The confidence interval for the difference between two means is given by

[tex]CI = (\bar{x_{1} } - \bar{x_{2}} ) \pm MoE\\\\[/tex]

Where [tex]\bar{x_{1} }[/tex] and [tex]\bar{x_{2} }[/tex] are the given sample means and margin of error is given by

[tex]$ MoE = z_{\alpha/2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{s_{1}^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_{2}^2}{n_2}} $[/tex]

The z-score corresponding to 95% confidence level is given by

Significance level = α = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05/2 = 0.025

From the z-table at α = 0.025 the z-score is 1.96

[tex]$ MoE = 1.96 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{225^2}{500} + \frac{189^2}{500}} $[/tex]

[tex]MoE = 1.96 \cdot 13.14[/tex]

[tex]MoE = 25.75[/tex]

Finally,

[tex]CI = (\bar{x_{1} } - \bar{x_{2}} ) \pm MoE\\\\[/tex]

[tex]CI = (527 - 439) \pm 25.75\\\\CI = 88 \pm 25.75\\\\CI = 88 - 25.75 \:\: and \:\: 88 + 25.75\\\\CI = (62.2 \: ,\: 113.8 )[/tex]

Therefore, the correct answer choice is a. (62.2, 113.8)

How to use z-table?

In the z-table find the probability of 0.025

Note down the value of that row, it would be 1.9.

Note down the value of that column, it would be 0.06.

Add the two numbers together.

The z-score is 1.9 + 0.06 = 1.96

Answer:

1, -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Let  x^-1 = 1/x = y

1. Root 1

2. Root 2

Answer:

1/36

Step-by-step explanation:

For each roll, the probability that the die rolls a 3 is 1/6

So, for it to happen on both dice is 1/6 * 1/6 = 1/36

The probability that an event will repeat its self for independent events is given by the square of the probability of the event occurring

Reason:

Number of faces in a fair die = 6 faces

Numbers on the faces of a fair die = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

Number of 3s on the face of a fair die = 1

Probability that a roll of a fair die gives the face of 3, P(3) = [tex]\dfrac{1}{6}[/tex]

The probability that two rolls of a fair die are both, is given as follows;

P(Both 3) = P(3 and 3) = P(3 ∩ 3)

The and condition of two independent probabilities is the product of the two probabilities, therefore;

P(3 ∩ 3) = [tex]\dfrac{1}{6} \times \dfrac{1}{6} = \dfrac{1}{36}[/tex]

The probability that both rolls are 3s P(Both 3s) = [tex]\underline{\dfrac{1}{36}}[/tex]

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/16543402

Answer:

I think that angles 1 and 2 are complementary

Step-by-step explanation:

option 1

plz mark brainliest!

Answer:a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: a) 39.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

For random selections, we assume that all the dogs have the same probability of being selected.

In this case, the probability will be equal to the number of golden retrievers divided the total number of dogs.

We have 58 golden retrievers, and the total number of dogs is:

31 + 58 +20 + 38 = 147

Then the probability is:

P = 58/147 = 0.395

If we multiply it by 100%, we obtain the percentage form:

0.395*100% = 39.5%

So the correct option is a.

Answer:

9 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of rectangle= length ×width

Let the length of the rectangle be x inches.

Width of rectangle= (x +2) inches

since the width is 2 more than the length.

63= x(x+2)

63= x(x) +2x

Bringing constant to one side,

x² +2x -63= 0

(x +9)(x-7) = 0 (factorise)

x+9= 0 or x-7= 0

x= -9 or x= 7

(reject)

width of rectangle

= 7+2

= 9 inches

*We reject x= -9 since the length of the rectangle cannot be a negative number.

Answer:

37.047

Step-by-step explanation:

Sin(39) = 30/hyp

Cos(39) = x/hyp

hyp = 30/Sin(39)

and hyp = x/Cos(39)

hyp = hyp

30/Sin(39) = x/Cos(39)

x = 30(Cos(39))/Sin(39)

x is approximately equal to 37.047