What are the factors of this quadratic function?

Answer:

15.2 lbs

Step-by-step explanation:

Make a ratio: 150 : 24 = 95 : x

[tex]\frac{75}{12}=\frac{95}{x}[/tex]

75x = 1140

x = 15.2

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

3/5 is a fraction, meaning it isn't irrational, natural, whole or an integer, therefore the answer is rational (B).

Answer:

B.rational

Step-by-step explanation:

3/5 is written as a fraction so it is a rational number

It is not a whole number since it is a reduced fraction that is less than 1

Answer:

he will be 25

Step-by-step explanation:

36 monthly payments left/12 payments a year = 3 years. 22 + 3 = 25

Answer:

P = 8000

t = 2

I = p × r × t

400 = 8000 × r/100 × 2

r = 400/160 per year

r = 40/16 = 2.5 %

Answer:

The value of X would be 4.

Answer:

x=4

Step-by-step explanation:

f(2)=3*2-1=5

g(x)=2x-3=5

2x=8

x=4

Answer:

[tex]P(X=5)=(7C5)(0.53)^5 (1-0.53)^{7-5}=0.194[/tex]

Then the probability that exactly 5 of them use their smartphones in meetings or classes is 0.194

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X the random variable of interest "number of adults with smartphones", on this case we now that:

[tex]X \sim Binom(n=7, p=0.53)[/tex]

The probability mass function for the Binomial distribution is given as:

[tex]P(X)=(nCx)(p)^x (1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

Where (nCx) means combinatory and it's given by this formula:

[tex]nCx=\frac{n!}{(n-x)! x!}[/tex]

And we want to find this probability:

[tex] P(X=5)[/tex]

Using the probability mass function we got:

[tex]P(X=5)=(7C5)(0.53)^5 (1-0.53)^{7-5}=0.194[/tex]

Then the probability that exactly 5 of them use their smartphones in meetings or classes is 0.194

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the right answer, we just need to replace the given root in each expression and see which one gives zero.

[tex]f(x)=4x^{4} -7x^{2} +x+25\\f(-\frac{2}{5})= 4(-\frac{2}{5})^{4} -7(-\frac{2}{5})^{2} +(-\frac{2}{5})+25=\frac{64}{625}-\frac{28}{25} -\frac{2}{5} +25 \approx 23.58[/tex]

[tex]f(x)=9x^{4}-7x^{2} +x+10=9(-\frac{2}{5} )^{4} -7(-\frac{2}{5} )^{2} +\frac{2}{5} +10 \approx 9.5[/tex]

[tex]f(x)=10x^{4}-7x^{2} +x+9=10(-\frac{2}{5} )^{4} -7(-\frac{2}{5})^{2} +(-\frac{2}{5})+9 \approx 7.7[/tex]

[tex]f(x)=25x^{4}-7x^{2} +x+4=25(-\frac{2}{5} )^{4} -7(-\frac{2}{5})^{2} +(-\frac{2}{5})+4 \approx 3.12[/tex]

Therefore, neither expression satisfies the given rational root.

Answer:

D. f(x) = 25x^4 - 7x^2 + x + 4.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer to your question is D.

Answer:

isosceles

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2000

Step-by-step explanation:

2500 / 100 = 25 (1%)

25 X 20 =500 (20%)

2500 - 500 =2000

Answer:

[tex]<38,52>[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]u=<4,-3>\\v=<-2,5>\\w=<0,-6>[/tex]

We are required to express 7u-5v+w in the form <a,b>.

[tex]7u-5v+w =7<4,-3>-5<-2,5>+<0,-6>\\=<28,-21>-<-10,25>+<0,-6>\\=<28-(-10)+0, -21-25-6>\\=<38,52>\\$Therefore:$\\7u-5v+w=<38,52>[/tex]

Answer:

This is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Associative property of multiplication is the grouping of numbers being multiplied can be changed without affecting the product.

here is an example!

Addison Rae work using the associative property:

(-8.5)(5)(-4) =

(-8.5)(-20) =

170

hope this helped it was from my FLVS schooling :)

Answer:

A) 9

Step-by-step explanation:

R=7x+17

S=4x-6

Q=180-110=70

Answer:

She can answer, after performing the hypothesis test, that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the city firefighters salary is significantly lower than the national average.

Step-by-step explanation:

She can statistically test the claim of the firefighters to see if it has statistical evidence.

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the city firefighters salary is significantly lower than the national average.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=38202\\\\H_a:\mu< 38202[/tex]

The significance level is 0.1.  Is less conservative than 0.05, for example, so if there is little evidence, the null hypothesis with be rejected.

The sample has a size n=27.

The sample mean is M=38073.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=575.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{575}{\sqrt{27}}=110.659[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{38073-38202}{110.659}=\dfrac{-129}{110.659}=-1.17[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

df=n-1=27-1=26

This test is a left-tailed test, with 26 degrees of freedom and t=-1.17, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(t<-1.17)=0.127[/tex]

As the P-value (0.127) is bigger than the significance level (0.1), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the city firefighters salary is significantly lower than the national average.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If n represents the number of nickels, and the number of quarters is 4 times the number of nickels, then the number of quarters is represented by 4n.

The total value of the coins in cents is ...

  5(n) +25(4n) = 210

  105n = 210 . . . . . . . . collect terms

  n = 210/105 = 2 . . . . number of nickels

  4n = 4(2) = 8 . . . . . . number of quarters

Peggy has 2 nickels and 8 quarters.

Answer:

D.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since a quadrilateral inscribed in a circle has its opposite angles adding up to 180°

So,

<MNO + <OLM = 180

82 + <OLM = 180

<OLM = 180-82

<OLM = 98°

Answer:

13n + 5

Step-by-step explanation:

2+3+8 = 13n

1+4 = 5

13n+5

Answer:

LIFE: Your life purpose consists of the central motivating aims of your life—the reasons you get up in the morning. Purpose can guide life decisions, influence behavior, shape goals, offer a sense of direction, and create meaning. For some people, purpose is connected to vocation—meaningful, satisfying work. Also always be your self (:

Corona: I think corona depending on were you live will stop next year when they find a treatment for it.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

Your life is the most important thing. It shouldn't be worth 1 million dollars, or even 1 billion dollars, because it's worth everything.  

Corona can't really stop. It's a matter of the government to try to contain the virus, so it won't spread even further. I think the right time to reopen the economy is when we find a vaccine. But of course, places all over the U.S. are already reopening which will cause a spike in cases, therefore making our "self-isolation" even longer.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Given the variables

Y: standardized history test score in third grade.

X₁: final percentage in history class.

X₂: number of absences per student.

Determine the following multiple regression values.

I've estimated the multiple regression equation using statistics software:

^Y= a + b₁X₁ + b₂X₂

a= 118.68

b₁= 3.61

b₂= -3.61

^Y= 118.68 + 3.61X₁ - 3.61X₂

ANOVA Regression model:

Sum of Square:

SS regression: 25653.86

SS Total: 36819.23

F-ratio: 11.49

p-value: 0.0026

Se²= MMError= 1116.54

Hypothesis for the number of absences:

H₀: β₂=0

H₁: β₂≠0

Assuming α:0.05

p-value: 0.4645

The p-value is greater than the significance level, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis. Then at 5% significance level, there is no evidence to reject the null hypothesis. You can conclude that there is no modification of the test score every time the number of absences increases one unit.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

y^6/x^2

Step-by-step explanation:

(y^3/2x^-1/2)^4= y^(4*3/2)x^(-1/2*4)=y^6x^-2= y^6/x^2

Answer:

Plan A would be the least expensive

Step-by-step explanation:

Plan A= $0.45x100= 45, 45+40=$85

Plan B= $0.35x100= 35, 35+70= %105

(Each plan is for 100 minutes)

Answer:

A and F

Step-by-step explanation:

First we'll dilate it by a scale factor of 2. After that, we'll translate in 6 units left and 6 units up to map circle J onto circle K

Answer:

[tex]\frac{1}{96}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Spinning a 5 is [tex]\frac{1}{12}[/tex]

Spinning even is [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Spinning multiple of 4 is [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{12} *\frac{1}{2} *\frac{1}{4}[/tex][tex]=\frac{1}{96}[/tex]

Answer:

D. Yes; the graph passes the vertical line test.

Step-by-step explanation:

→The vertical line test is when you hold something (like a pencil), straight up/vertically, and you move it from left-to-right to see if any two points repeat.

→The correct answer is "D. Yes; the graph passes the vertical line test," because the x-values can't repeat, not the y-values, if the graph were to show a function. In this case, the graph passes the vertical line test.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Confidence interval for the difference in the two proportions is written as

Difference in sample proportions ± margin of error

Sample proportion, p= x/n

Where x = number of success

n = number of samples

For the first brochure,

x = 100

n1 = 500

p1 = 100/500 = 0.2

For the second brochure

x = 125

n2 = 500

p2 = 125/500 = 0.25

Margin of error = z√[p1(1 - p1)/n1 + p2(1 - p2)/n2]

To determine the z score, we subtract the confidence level from 100% to get α

α = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05

α/2 = 0.05/2 = 0.025

This is the area in each tail. Since we want the area in the middle, it becomes

1 - 0.025 = 0.975

The z score corresponding to the area on the z table is 1.96. Thus, the z score for confidence level of 95% is 1.96

Margin of error = 1.96 × √[0.2(1 - 0.2)/500 + 0.25(1 - 0.25)/500]

= 1.96 × √0.000695

= 0.052

Confidence interval = (0.2 - 0.25) ± 0.052

= - 0.05 ± 0.052

Answer:

The ratio of the expenses shared by Akmal to Bakri to Cadin is 7 : 4 : 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The 3 of them shares their mother medical expenses which cost RM4200 . There mother medical expenses is RM4200 in total. Cadin pays RM2100 which is half of their mother medical expenses. Then Akmal pays three quarters of Bakri amount.

Let

The amount Bakri pays = a

Akmal pays = 3/4 of a

Akmal pays = 3/4a

Therefore,

a + 3a/4 = 2100

4a + 3a/ 4 = 2100

7a/4 = 2100

cross multiply

7a = 8400

divide both sides by 7

a = 8400/7

a = 1200

Therefore,

Bakri pays =RM 1200

Akmal pays = 3/4 × 1200 =RM 900

The ratio of the expenses shared by AKmal to Bakri to Cadin is expressed as 2100 : 1200 : 900. Divide through by 300

7 : 4 : 3

Answer:

(a) Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] = 23%    

    Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] [tex]\neq[/tex] 23%

(b) We conclude that the mean percentage is  different from 23 and the manufacturing process will be re-calibrated.

(c) P-value is 0.6%.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a certain manufactured product is supposed to contain 23% potassium by weight.

A sample of 10 specimens of this product had an average percentage of 23.2 with a standard deviation of 0.2.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = mean percentage of potassium by weight.

(a) Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] = 23%      {means that the mean percentage is equal to 23 and the manufacturing process will not be re-calibrated}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] [tex]\neq[/tex] 23%     {means that the mean percentage is  different from 23 and the manufacturing process will be re-calibrated}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample t-test statistics as we don't know about population standard deviation;

                                T.S. =  [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean percentage = 23.2

            s = sample standard deviation = 0.2

            n = sample of specimens = 10

So, the test statistics  =  [tex]\frac{23.2-23}{\frac{0.2}{\sqrt{10} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_9[/tex]

                                     =  3.162

The value of t test statistic is 3.162.

Since, in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now, at 5% significance level the t table gives critical value of -2.262 and 2.262 at 9 degree of freedom for two-tailed test.

(b) Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of t, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the mean percentage is  different from 23 and the manufacturing process will be re-calibrated.

(c) The P-value of the test statistics is given by;

            P-value = P( [tex]t_9[/tex] > 3.162) = 0.006 or 0.6%

(a) Null Hypothesis,  [tex]H_o:\mu[/tex]: = 23%    

   Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A:\mu\neq[/tex] : 23%

(b) We conclude that the mean percentage is  different from 23 and the manufacturing process will be re-calibrated.

(c) P-value is 0.6%.

The hypothesis that there is no significant difference between specified populations, any observed difference being due to sampling or experimental error.

We are given that a certain manufactured product is supposed to contain 23% potassium by weight.

A sample of 10 specimens of this product had an average percentage of 23.2 with a standard deviation of 0.2.

Let  = mean percentage of potassium by weight.

(a) Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_o:\mu[/tex]:  = 23%      {means that the mean percentage is equal to 23 and the manufacturing process will not be re-calibrated}

Alternate Hypothesis,  [tex]H_A:\mu\neq[/tex]:   23%     {means that the mean percentage is  different from 23 and the manufacturing process will be re-calibrated}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample t-test statistics as we don't know about population standard deviation;

[tex]TS=\dfrac{X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]   ~ [tex]t_{n-1}[/tex]

where,  = sample mean percentage = 23.2

           s = sample standard deviation = 0.2

           n = sample of specimens = 10

So, the test statistics  =   [tex]\dfrac{23.2-23}{\frac{0.2}{\sqrt{10}}}[/tex] ~ [tex]t_g[/tex]

                                    =  3.162

The value of t test statistic is 3.162.

Since, in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now, at 5% significance level the t table gives critical value of -2.262 and 2.262 at 9 degree of freedom for two-tailed test.

(b) Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of t, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the mean percentage is  different from 23 and the manufacturing process will be re-calibrated.

(c) The P-value of the test statistics is given by;

           P-value = P( [tex]t_g[/tex] > 3.162) = 0.006 or 0.6%

Hence ,

(a) Null Hypothesis,  [tex]H_o:\mu[/tex]: = 23%    

   Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A:\mu\neq[/tex] : 23%

(b) We conclude that the mean percentage is  different from 23 and the manufacturing process will be re-calibrated.

(c) P-value is 0.6%.

To know more about null hypothesis follow

https://brainly.com/question/15980493

Answer:

x - 5 - (3/x+8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(1) protein in hot dog = ¼ * protein in 3 ounces of hamburger

(2) protein in hot dog + protein in 3 ounces of hamburger = 25

So we need to re-arrange (1) and (2) to solve for the protein in 3 ounces of hamburger!

(re-arrange (1)): 4 * protein in hot dog = protein in 3 ounces of hamburger

(re-arrange (2)): protein in hot dog = 25 - protein in 3 ounces of hamburger

(plugging re-arranged (2) into re-arranged (1)):

4 * (25 - protein in 3 ounces of hamburger) = protein in 3 ounces of hamburger ( multiplying )

100- 4 protein in 3 ounces of hamburger = protein in 3 ounces of hamburger

solving for the protein in 3 ounces of hamburger:

5 * protein in 3 ounces of hamburger = 100

protein in 3 ounces of hamburger = 20 gram